| Revision as of 19:01, 9 May 2024 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,376,815 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Pepperbeast/Archives/2024 1. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024 edit undoPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits →Unnecessary reversion.Next edit → | ||
| (38 intermediate revisions by 11 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == |
== ] == | ||
| I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Not unnecessary == | |||
| :I don't get either. While Devanagri is the script of the union, you kept Gurmukhi and Meitei, which are official in a few states only? - ] (]) 19:16, 16 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Well, basically, I kept any scripts for which I could find any evidence for ''any'' official status. All that I could find with any official status at all were Devanagari (nationally for Hindi and some states for other languages), Gujarati, and Meitei. I basically checked every Indian state's official language legislation. I removed the infobox because it's about about 85% nonsense. I'd actually prefer to remove the article entirely, but an AFD got no consensus, so I settled for removing all of the downright nonsense. I may still suggest a merge to to ]. ] ] 20:17, 16 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::I'd support ] to ] merge. - ] (]) 20:45, 16 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::::@], what do you think of ], below? ] (]) 17:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Proposal: ] == | |||
| I noticed you've been doing some great work recently cleaning up some fluff and nonsense having to do with various topics, most of them South Asian—great job by the way—but I think some of the content you removed from ] can conceivably be merged into an article titled ] or even ] (or similar). A page titled ] exists but only as a redirect to ]; this is not correct, as many scripts used presently (e.g. Nastaliq, Latin) and historically (]) do not belong to the Brahmic family of languages. Overall I think you're correct that the article ] is poorly conceived, but in investigating the coverage of it and related topics during the AfD discussion, I realized there is surprisingly not really any article that talks about writing in South Asia as a whole, independent from a script/language (family) (e.g. ], ]) or a historical or modern-day culture or polity (e.g. ] itself). Thus, as I imagine it, the article would serve to house not just a list of languages ordered by script family, but also a section on the history of writing in South Asia—surprisingly, as best as I can tell, there's no Misplaced Pages article that really covers this as distinct from other topics (please correct me if I'm wrong)— or other topics that take a broad view of writing on the subcontinent (e.g. sociocultural or religious dimensions). | |||
| not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| There is ample precedent for such an article, e.g. ], ], ]. | |||
| == Unnecessary reversion. == | |||
| Similarly, the template {{tl|Officially used writing systems in India}} could be reworked in a similar way into {{tl|South Asian scripts}} or something (although IMO the case for the template isn't as strong as for the article, since {{tl|Infobox Writing system}} arguably serves; to be discussed). | |||
| If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| What do you think of this? ] (]) 17:20, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| :{{ping|Brusquedandelion}} I don't see a problem with ]. You can create it. - ] (]) 18:29, 17 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Mizo language == | |||
| Hi, could you have a look at ] article? Apparently needs some cleanup, also the article is subject to POV push by some users. Thanks. - ] (]) 14:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Oh, sure... it doesn't look as messy as some of the ones I've been looking at, but I'm sure it can be tightened and polished a bit. Now, where did I put my hip waders...? ] ] 14:32, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::If you can't find your's, 's one {{p}}. - ] (]) 17:28, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::I don't think image is sourced. - ] (]) 19:04, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ⚫ | ::: |
||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] (]) 16:40, 28 March 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==]== | |||
| Hello, Pepperbeast, | |||
| Just a reminder, you need to tag evey category in a bundled nomination, not just one or two, and notify the category creators of this discussion. Thank you for seeing to this at your convenience. <span style="font-family:Papyrus; color:#800080;">]</span> <sup style="font-family: Times New Roman; color: #006400;">] ]</sup> 06:44, 3 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Yikes! Thanks for the heads-up! ] ] 07:21, 3 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> ] ] 13:26, 4 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Nomination for deletion of ] == | |||
| ]] has been ]. You are invited to comment on the discussion at ].<!--Template:Tfdnotice--> – ] (]) 00:41, 6 April 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ==Disambiguation link notification for May 9 == | |||
| An automated process has detected that when you recently edited ], you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ]. | |||
| (].) --] (]) 05:54, 9 May 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Dutch exonyms
I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Not unnecessary
This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary reversion.
If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)