Revision as of 23:13, 10 July 2024 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,384,439 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Pepperbeast/Archives/2024 1. (BOT)← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024 edit undoPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,716 edits →Unnecessary reversion.Next edit → | ||
(31 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown) | |||
Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
}} | }} | ||
== ] == | |||
== Inappropriate Redirect of "List of countries and territories where Tamil is an official language" == | |||
I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
Hello Pepperbeast, | |||
== Not unnecessary == | |||
I have reverted your redirect of the "List of countries and territories where Tamil is an official language" page to the section in the "Tamil language" article. Your action is inconsistent with Misplaced Pages's standards for separate list articles. Similar list articles exist for Hindi, Chinese, and other languages, and there is no justification for singling out Tamil for redirection. | |||
not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
The list article provides a focused and comprehensive reference that is essential for readers specifically seeking this information. Redirecting it undermines the structure and utility of Misplaced Pages. | |||
== Unnecessary reversion. == | |||
Please refrain from making such changes in the future without seeking consensus from the community. Further unilateral redirects of this nature will not be tolerated. If you have any concerns or suggestions, discuss them on the article's talk page. | |||
If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Thank you, | |||
:What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
--] (]) 12:10, 4 July 2024 (UTC) | |||
::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
:::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) |
Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024
Archives (Index) |
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Dutch exonyms
I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Not unnecessary
This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary reversion.
If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)