| Revision as of 14:43, 11 September 2024 editTrUtHJan (talk | contribs)80 edits →Vandalism observed Kannada page by the user TirukodimadachengunrurTags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024 edit undoPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits →Unnecessary reversion.Next edit → | ||
| (28 intermediate revisions by 9 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] == | |||
| == Vandalism observed Kannada page by the user Tirukodimadachengunrur == | |||
| I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| "Pepperbeast" | |||
| If just adding some random source to any piece of information qualifies as "sourced information", then what is the meaning of sourced information. | |||
| == Not unnecessary == | |||
| I have gone through those attached references and NOWHERE does it attest this information. I'm very much aware of "Iravatham Mahadevan's" works and it's far from what has been claimed here as his findings. This is pure misinformation added by the user '''Tirukodimadachengunrur''', to impose their biased views on the Misplaced Pages readers. In fact even the writing style does not match with that of the referenced document. It's our responsibility to prevent such acts of vandalism and restore genuine information. | |||
| I kindly request you to review the sources before restoring it. TrUtHJan (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply | |||
| not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Fylindfotberserk | |||
| In contrast Iravatham Mahadevan talks about Old kannada language's influence on Old Tamil and not vise versa. Here the user | |||
| == Unnecessary reversion. == | |||
| '''Tirukodimadachengunrur''' has explicitly tried to quote that Kannada follows the structure of Old Tamil which is false. Furthermore this user goes on to add that Kannada retains the words once used in Tamil which is again incorrect. It has been presented in a way that's completely opposite to what has been documented by renowned linguist "Iravatham Mahadevan". In point of fact even the other attached source "the history of kannada" has nothing that supports the claims of the user '''Tirukodimadachengunrur'''. | |||
| IRAVTAHAM MAHAVEDAN's views have been nicely put across under the "History" section of the same Misplaced Pages page where you can see how the renowned linguist explain why he thinks Tamil retains many Kannada words and not vice verse as claimed by a few editors here. ] (]) 14:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Dutch exonyms
I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Not unnecessary
This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary reversion.
If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)