| Revision as of 14:33, 31 October 2024 editPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits →Shia islam: Terminology← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024 edit undoPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits →Unnecessary reversion.Next edit → | ||
| (15 intermediate revisions by 5 users not shown) | |||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == ] == | |||
| == Vandalism observed Kannada page by the user Tirukodimadachengunrur == | |||
| I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | |||
| "Pepperbeast" | |||
| If just adding some random source to any piece of information qualifies as "sourced information", then what is the meaning of sourced information. | |||
| I have gone through those attached references and NOWHERE does it attest this information. I'm very much aware of "Iravatham Mahadevan's" works and it's far from what has been claimed here as his findings. This is pure misinformation added by the user '''Tirukodimadachengunrur''', to impose their biased views on the Misplaced Pages readers. In fact even the writing style does not match with that of the referenced document. It's our responsibility to prevent such acts of vandalism and restore genuine information. | |||
| I kindly request you to review the sources before restoring it. TrUtHJan (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2024 (UTC)Reply | |||
| Fylindfotberserk | |||
| In contrast Iravatham Mahadevan talks about Old kannada language's influence on Old Tamil and not vise versa. Here the user | |||
| '''Tirukodimadachengunrur''' has explicitly tried to quote that Kannada follows the structure of Old Tamil which is false. Furthermore this user goes on to add that Kannada retains the words once used in Tamil which is again incorrect. It has been presented in a way that's completely opposite to what has been documented by renowned linguist "Iravatham Mahadevan". In point of fact even the other attached source "the history of kannada" has nothing that supports the claims of the user '''Tirukodimadachengunrur'''. | |||
| IRAVTAHAM MAHAVEDAN's views have been nicely put across under the "History" section of the same Misplaced Pages page where you can see how the renowned linguist explain why he thinks Tamil retains many Kannada words and not vice verse as claimed by a few editors here. ] (]) 14:43, 11 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Not unnecessary == | |||
| == Edit to Adultery page == | |||
| not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Hello, | |||
| == Unnecessary reversion. == | |||
| I had started to try and rework the Hinduism section on the page as it was bloated, didn't read well and had problems with the sources. However I have seen that these edits were reverse, I thought I would reach out to you here to discuss the section. I am not trying to restate any of the facts, just clean up a number of errors (especially in regards to the sources) and generally make the section higher quality and more legible. I would like to discuss the edits with you here before I make any more edits, to reassure that these edits are genuine and will produce a better article. | |||
| If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| Best, ] (]) 13:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| ⚫ | :What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == I think your edit was a mistake, I have reverted you == | |||
| ::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | :::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| I think that this edit was a mistake, instead of engaging with what were valid and constructive points you shut down the conversation. I am at a loss for why you would do that, but anyway I have reverted. Have a nice day. ] (]) 16:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :Hatnote was appropriate. An article talk page is not the best place to discuss Misplaced Pages in general or what articles should be created. It was also several years ago. ] ] 02:17, 27 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Name articles == | |||
| Variations of names are a legitimate addition to articles about the history and usage of said names. Most of the variants are included in name dictionaries. i am reverting your deletions and suggest you discuss it on the talk pages before restoring your deletions. Your edits are disputed. ] (]) 03:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Shia islam: Terminology == | |||
| I don't believe your recent edit on shia Islam, is constructive. | |||
| Terminology section is part of the body and should act as a semi full overview. Your edit diminished insight and visibility of the subject. I want to revert it and I'll edit it for clarity if you think it needs more work. | |||
| reaching out because I'm watching the page. ] (]) 16:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :This discussion belongs over at ]. ] ] 16:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::i realised i missread the edits you made. They are constructive. thank you. ] (]) 04:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | ::: |
||
Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Dutch exonyms
I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Not unnecessary
This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary reversion.
If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)