| Revision as of 00:14, 19 November 2024 editMediaWiki message delivery (talk | contribs)Bots3,136,056 edits →ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message: new sectionTag: MassMessage delivery← Previous edit | Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024 edit undoPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits →Unnecessary reversion.Next edit → | ||
| (11 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown) | |||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
| |box-advert=yes | |box-advert=yes | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| == Edit to Adultery page == | |||
| Hello, | |||
| I had started to try and rework the Hinduism section on the page as it was bloated, didn't read well and had problems with the sources. However I have seen that these edits were reverse, I thought I would reach out to you here to discuss the section. I am not trying to restate any of the facts, just clean up a number of errors (especially in regards to the sources) and generally make the section higher quality and more legible. I would like to discuss the edits with you here before I make any more edits, to reassure that these edits are genuine and will produce a better article. | |||
| Best, ] (]) 13:54, 22 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| == I think your edit was a mistake, I have reverted you == | |||
| I think that this edit was a mistake, instead of engaging with what were valid and constructive points you shut down the conversation. I am at a loss for why you would do that, but anyway I have reverted. Have a nice day. ] (]) 16:43, 26 September 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ⚫ | : |
||
| == Name articles == | |||
| Variations of names are a legitimate addition to articles about the history and usage of said names. Most of the variants are included in name dictionaries. i am reverting your deletions and suggest you discuss it on the talk pages before restoring your deletions. Your edits are disputed. ] (]) 03:46, 4 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == Shia islam: Terminology == | |||
| I don't believe your recent edit on shia Islam, is constructive. | |||
| Terminology section is part of the body and should act as a semi full overview. Your edit diminished insight and visibility of the subject. I want to revert it and I'll edit it for clarity if you think it needs more work. | |||
| reaching out because I'm watching the page. ] (]) 16:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :This discussion belongs over at ]. ] ] 16:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| ::i realised i missread the edits you made. They are constructive. thank you. ] (]) 04:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| :::Thanks ] ] 14:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC) | |||
| == ] == | == ] == | ||
| Line 48: | Line 21: | ||
| I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC) | ||
| == Not unnecessary == | |||
| == ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message == | |||
| not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| <div class="ivmbox " style="margin-bottom: 1em; border: 1px solid #a2a9b1; background-color: #fdf2d5; padding: 0.5em; display: flex; align-items: center; "> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-image noresize" style="padding-left:1px; padding-right:0.5em;">]</div> | |||
| <div class="ivmbox-text"> | |||
| Hello! Voting in the ''']''' is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All ''']''' are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. | |||
| == Unnecessary reversion. == | |||
| The ] is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the ]. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose ], ], editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The ] describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. | |||
| If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review ] and submit your choices on the ''']'''. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. <small>] (]) 00:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)</small> | |||
| ⚫ | :What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| </div> | |||
| ::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | |||
| </div> | |||
| ⚫ | :::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC) | ||
| <!-- Message sent by User:Cyberpower678@enwiki using the list at https://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=Misplaced Pages:Arbitration_Committee_Elections_December_2024/Coordination/MM/02&oldid=1258243447 --> | |||
Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024
 Archives (Index) |
|
This page is archived by ClueBot III. |
Dutch exonyms
I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
Not unnecessary
This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Unnecessary reversion.
If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
- Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)