Misplaced Pages

User talk:Pepperbeast: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 13:24, 3 December 2024 editClueBot III (talk | contribs)Bots1,376,815 editsm Archiving 1 discussion to User talk:Pepperbeast/Archives/2024 1. (BOT)← Previous edit Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024 edit undoPepperbeast (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users21,700 edits Unnecessary reversion.Next edit →
(7 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 17: Line 17:
}} }}


== Shia islam: Terminology == == ] ==


I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)
I don't believe your recent edit on shia Islam, is constructive.
Terminology section is part of the body and should act as a semi full overview. Your edit diminished insight and visibility of the subject. I want to revert it and I'll edit it for clarity if you think it needs more work.


== Not unnecessary ==
reaching out because I'm watching the page. ] (]) 16:01, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
:This discussion belongs over at ]. ] ] 16:54, 29 October 2024 (UTC)
::i realised i missread the edits you made. They are constructive. thank you. ] (]) 04:17, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
:::Thanks ] ] 14:33, 31 October 2024 (UTC)


not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. ] (]) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
== ] ==


== Unnecessary reversion. ==
I think this was kept but ]. Do you want to nominate this again? ] (]) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

If some other page want to link directly to , how would it do that? ] (]) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

:What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? ] ] 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
::Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. ] (]) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
:::You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. ] ] 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:36, 31 December 2024


Archives (Index)



This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Dutch exonyms

I think this was kept but consensus seems to have changed. Do you want to nominate this again? Bearian (talk) 19:45, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

Not unnecessary

This is not unnecessary. Some external site might want to link to some particular section. Riteze (talk) 17:34, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

Unnecessary reversion.

If some other page want to link directly to Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, how would it do that? Riteze (talk) 17:38, 31 December 2024 (UTC)

What do you see as the value of deep-linking into a list with limited information? PepperBeast (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Since there doesn't exist any independent page/section on Purva Ashadha Nakshatra, other pages are forced to link to the information where it is present. Thus, an anchor is necessary at this point, if another page want to link to this particular nakshatra. Riteze (talk) 17:52, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
You don't have to make precise links to everything. If the information's not there, it's not helpful to the user. PepperBeast (talk) 22:36, 31 December 2024 (UTC)