| Revision as of 02:50, 30 April 2007 editArad (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,999 edits →Territorial disputes← Previous edit | Revision as of 17:31, 30 April 2007 edit undoPmanderson (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers62,751 edits other uses of ArvandNext edit → | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
| }} | }} | ||
| The '''Arvand Rūd''' (]: اروندرود, literally ''Arvand River'') or the '''Shatt al-Arab''' (]: شط العرب, literally ''Coast of the Arabs''), is a ] in ] of some 200 km in length, formed by the confluence of the ] and the ] in the town of ] in the ] of southern ]. The southern end of the river constitutes the border between Iraq and ] down to the mouth of the river as it discharges into the ]. It varies in width from about 760 feet (232 m) at ] to 0.5 mile (0.8 km) at its mouth. The ] river, a tributary which joins the waterway from the Iranian side, deposits large amounts of ] into the river; this necessitates continuous dredging to keep it navigable. It is thought that the waterway formed relatively recently in geologic time, with the Tigris and Euphrates originally emptying into the ] via a channel further to the west. | The '''Arvand Rūd''' (]: اروندرود, literally ''Arvand River''; ''Arvand'' is also a Persian name for the ], and even the ]) or the '''Shatt al-Arab''' (]: شط العرب, literally ''Coast of the Arabs''), is a ] in ] of some 200 km in length, formed by the confluence of the ] and the ] in the town of ] in the ] of southern ]. The southern end of the river constitutes the border between Iraq and ] down to the mouth of the river as it discharges into the ]. It varies in width from about 760 feet (232 m) at ] to 0.5 mile (0.8 km) at its mouth. The ] river, a tributary which joins the waterway from the Iranian side, deposits large amounts of ] into the river; this necessitates continuous dredging to keep it navigable. It is thought that the waterway formed relatively recently in geologic time, with the Tigris and Euphrates originally emptying into the ] via a channel further to the west. | ||
| ==Territorial disputes== | ==Territorial disputes== | ||
Revision as of 17:31, 30 April 2007
River| Shatt al-Arab | |
|---|---|
 | |
| Physical characteristics | |
| Mouth | Persian Gulf |
The Arvand Rūd (Persian: اروندرود, literally Arvand River; Arvand is also a Persian name for the Tigris, and even the Orontes) or the Shatt al-Arab (Arabic: شط العرب, literally Coast of the Arabs), is a river in Southwest Asia of some 200 km in length, formed by the confluence of the Euphrates and the Tigris in the town of al-Qurnah in the Basra Governorate of southern Iraq. The southern end of the river constitutes the border between Iraq and Iran down to the mouth of the river as it discharges into the Persian Gulf. It varies in width from about 760 feet (232 m) at Basra to 0.5 mile (0.8 km) at its mouth. The Karun river, a tributary which joins the waterway from the Iranian side, deposits large amounts of silt into the river; this necessitates continuous dredging to keep it navigable. It is thought that the waterway formed relatively recently in geologic time, with the Tigris and Euphrates originally emptying into the Persian Gulf via a channel further to the west.
Territorial disputes
For a long time, starting from the Achaemenid Empire (559 BC) until the Afsharid dynasty in 1747, the river was for most of the time under Persian rule and was called Arvandrud by the Persians.
Conflicting territorial claims and disputes over navigation rights between Iran and Iraq were among the main factors for the Iraq-Iran War that lasted from 1980 to 1988, when the pre-1980 status quo was restored. The Iranian cities of Abadan and Khorramshahr and the Iraqi city and major port of Basra are situated along this river.
Control of the waterway and its use as a border have been a source of contention between the predecessors of the Iranian and Iraqi states since a peace treaty signed in 1639 between the Persian and the Ottoman Empires, which divided the territory according to tribal customs and loyalties, without attempting a rigorous land survey. The tribes on both sides of the lower waterway, however, are Marsh Arabs, and the Ottoman Empire claimed to represent them. Tensions between the opposing empires that extended across a wide range of religious, cultural and political conflicts, led to the outbreak of hostilities in the 19th century and eventually yielded the Second Treaty of Erzurum between the two parties, in 1847, after protracted negotiations, which included British and Russian delegates. Even afterwards, backtracking and disagreements continued, until British Foreign Secretary, Lord Palmerston, was moved to comment in 1851 that "the boundary line between Turkey and Persia can never be finally settled except by an arbitrary decision on the part of Great Britain and Russia". A protocol between the Young Turks and the Persians was signed in Constantinople in 1913, but World War I cancelled all plans.
The British advisors in Iraq were able to keep the waterway bi-national under the thalweg principle that has worked in Europe (see Danube River): the dividing line was the line of steepest descent along the stream bed. All United Nations attempts to intervene as mediators were rebuffed. Under Saddam Hussein, Baathist Iraq claimed the entire waterway up to the Iranian shore as its territory. But in 1975, Iraq signed the Algiers Accord in which it recognized a series of straight lines closely approximating the thalweg (deepest channel) of the waterway, as the official border. In 1980, Hussein released a statement claiming to abrogate the treaty that he signed, and Iraq invaded Iran. (International law, however, holds in all cases that any bi-lateral or multi-lateral treaty cannot be abrogated by one party and one party only.) The main thrust of the military movement on the ground was across the Arvandrud/Shatt al Arab which was the stage for most of the military battles between the two armies. The waterway was Iraq's only outlet to the Persian Gulf, and thus, its shipping lanes were greatly affected by continuous Iranian attacks. When the Al-Faw peninsula was captured by the Iranians in 1987, Iraq's shipping activities virtually came to a halt and had to be diverted to other Arab ports, such as Kuwait and even Aqaba, Jordan. Later, and as the Persian Gulf War was looming, Saddam again recognized the Algiers Accord in order to appease Iranians before he could undertake an invasion of Kuwait.
Recent conflicts
In the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the Arvandrud/Shatt al Arab was a key military target for the Coalition Forces. Since it is the only outlet to the Persian Gulf, its capture was important in delivering humanitarian aid to the rest of the country, and also to stop the flow of illegal smuggling operations. The British Royal Marines staged an amphibious assault to capture the key oil installations and shipping docks located at Umm Qasr on the al-Faw peninsula at the onset of the conflict.
Following the end of the war the UK was given responsibility, subsequently mandated by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1723, to patrol the waterway and the area of the Persian Gulf surrounding the river mouth. They are tasked to make sure that ships in the area are not being used to transport munitions into Iraq. British forces have also trained Iraqi naval units to take over the responsibility of guarding their waterways.
On two separate occasions, Iranian forces operating on the Arvandrud/Shatt al-Arab have captured British Royal Navy sailors who they claim have trespassed into their territory.
- In June 2004, several British servicemen were held for two days after apparently straying into the Iranian side of the waterway. After being initially threatened with prosecution, they were released after high level conversations between British Foreign Secretary, Jack Straw, and Iranian Minister of Foreign Affairs, Kamal Kharrazi. The initial hardline approach was put down to power struggles within the Iranian government. The British marines' weapons and boats were confiscated.
- In 2007, a seizure of fifteen more British personnel became a major diplomatic crisis between the two nations. It was resolved after thirteen days when the Iranians unexpectedly released the captives under an "amnesty".