User talk:KillerChihuahua: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:30, 30 April 2007 editKillerChihuahua (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users34,578 edits →Good puppy: bah and now you've gone and trolled.← Previous edit		Revision as of 23:32, 30 April 2007 edit undoFilll (talk \| contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →Good puppy Next edit →
Line 98:		Line 98:
	:You could have been a little more civil, and Fill was frankly getting borderline. I strongly suggest to both of you that you contain your frustration with the editor, who is, after all, new; and confine your comments and responses to discussing the article itself. No good is served by escalation of this mudfest. Thanks for the thanks, and thanks in advance for helping me de-escalate this and help Til learn the ropes here. I am attempting to engage him in discussion on his talk page. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)		:You could have been a little more civil, and Fill was frankly getting borderline. I strongly suggest to both of you that you contain your frustration with the editor, who is, after all, new; and confine your comments and responses to discussing the article itself. No good is served by escalation of this mudfest. Thanks for the thanks, and thanks in advance for helping me de-escalate this and help Til learn the ropes here. I am attempting to engage him in discussion on his talk page. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
	::Bah and now you've gone and trolled. I removed it. In the future, if you think of too witty a jibe to manage to keep to yourself, feel free to post it on my talk page or email it to me, and refrain from continuing or escalating a flame war (however small the flame) - thanks much. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)		::Bah and now you've gone and trolled. I removed it. In the future, if you think of too witty a jibe to manage to keep to yourself, feel free to post it on my talk page or email it to me, and refrain from continuing or escalating a flame war (however small the flame) - thanks much. ]<sup>]</sup> 23:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
			:::Ok I will be good. Please don't bite me. Nice doggy...--] 23:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:32, 30 April 2007

KillerChihuahua is suffering from physical health issues. This may affect her ability to work on Misplaced Pages. Consequently, she may not be able to respond to talk-page messages or e-mails in a timely manner. Your patience is greatly appreciated.

This is a Misplaced Pages user discussion page.

This is not an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Misplaced Pages, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user this page belongs to may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Misplaced Pages itself. The original page is located at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:KillerChihuahua.

Wikimedia Foundation

Talk to the Puppy
To leave a message on this page, click here.
If you email me, be aware that even if I am actively editing, I cannot always access my email and it may be a day or two before you receive a reply.
If you message me on this page, I will probably reply on this page. If I messaged you on your page, please reply there.

*Post new messages to the bottom of my talk page.
*Comment about the content of a specific article on the Talk: page of that article, and not here.
*Sign your post using four tildes ( ~~~~ )

24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives

Attack?

KC, I fail to see how my comment here was an "attack" on FM that couldn't be allowed to go "unnoticed," at least relative to his immediately preceding comment and the one shortly before it. Can you explain, please? Gnixon 02:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

FM said "This group of yours has gone out of its way to malign the various admins here, myself included" and then he discussed content, not you - explained how your actions are clearly becoming tendentious editing, and said " WP:AGF requires us to assume your good faith, but not in the presence of evidence to the contrary. "'. Your response? "you don't exactly have a rosy record within the "community."" - which is not commenting on his edits, nor any policy or guideline he may be in danger of violating on that talk page, but a personal, and negative, judgement which is 1) your opinion, not backed up by anything, and 2) a personal attack. What is so hard to see about that? I find it odd that you brought up his previous post, as he specifically mentions your maligning editors, and your response was to yet again malign him! KillerChihuahua 11:06, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

I understand your point, but I think including me in some arbitrary group and then accusing "us" of various things, including editing without good faith, and saying the "community" will not stand for "us" constitutes a thinly veiled personal attack. I thought my response was measured and appropriate, but in the future I'll phrase things in an impersonal way. Thanks for responding. Gnixon 14:26, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

editura gama deleted

Hello Please tell me why was editura gama deleted ? Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ellakali (talk • contribs) 09:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC).

WP:CSD A7, no assertion of notability. Also probably qualifies under CSD G11, advert, since the only link was to the company site. KillerChihuahua 20:41, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Francisco Gil-White mediation

You may recall User:Ryan4, who repeatedly tried to spam links to http://www.hirhome.com to various Misplaced Pages articles - you tackled him about it on his user talk page (User talk:Ryan4#Stop spamming) and on AN/I (Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive123#User:Ryan4). He appears to have learned nothing from the experience and has now brought a mediation case, singling me out for some reason. See Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-31 ChrisO‎. Given your previous intervention in the matter, I've added you as an involved party. My response is at Misplaced Pages talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-31 ChrisO#ChrisO. Naturally I think the whole thing's a waste of time and I'm encouraging the mediator to dump it on the grounds of Ryan4's bad faith, but it would be helpful if you could add a comment or two so that we can have a record of where things stand. Unfortunately I don't think this will be the last we'll hear from the hirhome fan club - Ryan4 now appears to be coordinating with fellow hirhomers. -- ChrisO 18:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the comments. I agree 100% with what you wrote - however, it'll be useful to have our collected comments in one place if and when the hirhomers try to make another move. -- ChrisO 23:32, 18 April 2007 (UTC)

Thank you for letting me know about this, I am unfortunately unable to be on very much right now and I would not have known about this had you not brought it to my attention. KillerChihuahua 01:59, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

No problem. -- ChrisO 06:49, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

3RR

hello I have made 4 edits in these articles during the day: Račak incident and Gazimestan speech because of disruptive edits by the user Nikola Smolenski. I hope I will not get blocked. Can I do anything to avoid blocking? Thank you in advance --Noah30 13:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Revert your last edit and state in the edit summary "reverting self to avoid violating 3RR". KillerChihuahua 13:22, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Oh, except if the Račak incident is the one I also reverted, just leave it alone - that was a link to a copyright violation and I have stated in my edit summary and on the talk page that is the situation. If anyone reports you for that, post a link here. KillerChihuahua 13:24, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Hello

The reason i asked Nikola for help is that he is more familiar with the rules of wiki, so i figured he could help me with which ways to go do deal with this users. There are now 3 ip:s changing almost the exact same articles, 124.186.125.166, 124.185.183.180 and 124.186.124.51. One of these edits include putting up a picture of User:Ivan Kricancics brother on Smith's (potato chips). The ip:s are also from Queensland, Australia the same state in which Ivan is from. Paulcicero 13:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Then I suggest checkuser. Confirmation will make it easier to deal with. Use the vandalism warnings and report the vandalism. KillerChihuahua 14:00, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Check this out: This user is a sockpuppet or a meatpuppet of Ivan Kricancic as established by Misplaced Pages:Suspected sock puppets/Ivan Kricancic, and has been blocked indefinitely.

Noah's Ark

KC, Codex placed a tag on the article stating that it is part of WikiProject:Religion: it is not see (http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Codex_Sinaiticus&diff=124480781&oldid=124478512). I'm out of reverts -- if you would, could you remove his tag? Jim62sch 11:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

PBA Act articles

There's been an upsurge in activity on Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, Intact dilation and extraction, Gonzales v. Carhart, and Abortion in the wake of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, which was featured on "In the news" on the Main page. We've got our hands full, and and we could use another set of eyes watching over things, if you've got the time. Thanks! -Severa (!!!) 12:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

RI Mediation

I hope that you are feeling better. Will the mediation at RI continue? It seems that the other editors have moved on to completely reorganize the project, while I have waited for mediation to determine the direction of the process. Am I being naive? I noticed that the limitation to registered users was removed today from the main article. Thanks. --Kevin Murray 16:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I have attempted to gain assistance or transfer to another mediator; and have been unsuccessful. I do not feel you are being naive, but do suggest you continue to work with other editors while the mediation is stalled. I sincerely hope that either I or another mediator will be able to continue in the near future; the future being uncertain, I cannot guarantee when or even if that will be. KillerChihuahua 19:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Health

Get better! --PaxEquilibrium 19:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

thanks much. I appreciate the good wishes. KillerChihuahua 19:00, 29 April 2007 (UTC)

Big time

You're right, I do owe you! Sorry for dragging you into the Gil-White business. I'm still rather taken aback at Nikola's position on the issue - it's obtuse even for him. Never mind though - I think he's got the message now. Thanks for your assistance, best wishes for your health and I promise not to tax you too hard in the future. :-) -- ChrisO 19:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't be a puppy if I didn't whine now and then, but seriously, ping me if you ever need asssistance and if I am able, I will do what I can. KillerChihuahua 10:28, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Račak incident

Račak incident User Nikola Smolenski is making disruptive and POV edits in this article Račak incident. Some days ago you asked him to stop but he is back and continues with the same. Can you talk to him once again? --Noah30 15:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

He is back again using account Nikola Smolenski and other accounts and keep vadalizing everything. Can we do anything? I get headache of him. I hope I am not disturbing you and wish you good health. --Noah30 18:46, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

DMOZ Section on WP:EL

I just reverted your edit to the WP:EL page - there is an ongoing discussion on the Talk page about whether this section which has been in for several months, should stay or be changed. I don't feel we should make changes to the page until those discussions have been resolved. Would welcome your input to that discussion. Thanks. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 18:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

You're a day late and a dollar short, I posted to the talk page before I made the edit which you immediately reverted. The change which you want to policy violates existing policies and guidelines. I have no idea why you are pretending it does not, and as though those opposed to this are the ones attempting to change policy. KillerChihuahua 19:37, 24 April 2007 (UTC)

Dear Puppy!

Get well soon,
my dear Puppy!Dear Puppy, it's so great to see you again! When I saw your message, I felt like jumping out of sheer happiness ;) So many things have happened since we last saw each other that I promise to update you asap via email, sounds ok?

My happiness, however, has diminished by seeing that you're not doing well because of health problems. Please, take good care of yourself - will you, dear? We all love you and wish that you get well soon. Don't hesitate to message me if you wish to relax and watch over your page, or anything else you may need.

Love you Puppy! :) I'll email you soon - meanwhile, please rest and get well, and once again, thank you for your beautiful words ;) Phaedriel - 11:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC)

Thanks you, sweetie!

Thanks for the wonderful gift, Puppy - you touched me! :) I swear it'll have a place of honor on my userpage ;) It's great to see you again! How's your health, sweetie? Feeling better, I hope? Phaedriel - 01:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Glad if it brightened your day a little, as you do so much to brighten this place for everyone else.

I'm not doing better yet - no results yet, but I have good days and bad days and try to edit when I can. KillerChihuahua 21:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Good puppy

What the heck was that all about on the Noah's Ark article? Thanks for your support. If I was being uncivil, please tell me, but that was one odd conversation and accusation. Orangemarlin 23:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

You could have been a little more civil, and Fill was frankly getting borderline. I strongly suggest to both of you that you contain your frustration with the editor, who is, after all, new; and confine your comments and responses to discussing the article itself. No good is served by escalation of this mudfest. Thanks for the thanks, and thanks in advance for helping me de-escalate this and help Til learn the ropes here. I am attempting to engage him in discussion on his talk page. KillerChihuahua 23:25, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Bah and now you've gone and trolled. I removed it. In the future, if you think of too witty a jibe to manage to keep to yourself, feel free to post it on my talk page or email it to me, and refrain from continuing or escalating a flame war (however small the flame) - thanks much. KillerChihuahua 23:30, 30 April 2007 (UTC)

Ok I will be good. Please don't bite me. Nice doggy...--Filll 23:32, 30 April 2007 (UTC)