Revision as of 01:50, 1 May 2007 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Good puppy← Previous edit | Revision as of 01:51, 1 May 2007 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →Good puppyNext edit → | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
:::::::::::Yeah, but come on, that guy was threatening us with everything short of nuclear war. I'm trying to be nice with these guys, but why can't I be more like FeloniousMonk? He doesn't take crap from anyone!!!! ] 01:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | :::::::::::Yeah, but come on, that guy was threatening us with everything short of nuclear war. I'm trying to be nice with these guys, but why can't I be more like FeloniousMonk? He doesn't take crap from anyone!!!! ] 01:50, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::::::::::Oops, by the way, I wasn't at all hurt by what you were saying. I'm glad you're back too. How about kicking some RBJ butt over at ID? ] 01:51, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
:::::To paraphrase the ], "Maybe trolling is a bit strong, but..." I understand KC's motives, but in this case don't necessarily agree. On the other hand, I've had a really pissy day and am ready to skewer anyone who pisses me off so I might not be in the right frame of mind to pass judgment. ] 00:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | :::::To paraphrase the ], "Maybe trolling is a bit strong, but..." I understand KC's motives, but in this case don't necessarily agree. On the other hand, I've had a really pissy day and am ready to skewer anyone who pisses me off so I might not be in the right frame of mind to pass judgment. ] 00:25, 1 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:51, 1 May 2007
Userpage | talk | contribs | sandbox | e-mail | shiny stuff 4:27 pm, 24 December 2024 (UTC)
24 - 23 - 22 - 21 - 20 -19 - 18 -17 - 16 -15 - 14 -13 -12 -11 - 10 - 9 - 8 - 7 - 6 - 5 -4 - 3 - 2 - 1 - Archives
Attack?KC, I fail to see how my comment here was an "attack" on FM that couldn't be allowed to go "unnoticed," at least relative to his immediately preceding comment and the one shortly before it. Can you explain, please? Gnixon 02:45, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
editura gama deletedHello Please tell me why was editura gama deleted ? Thank you —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Ellakali (talk • contribs) 09:01, 17 April 2007 (UTC).
Francisco Gil-White mediationYou may recall User:Ryan4, who repeatedly tried to spam links to http://www.hirhome.com to various Misplaced Pages articles - you tackled him about it on his user talk page (User talk:Ryan4#Stop spamming) and on AN/I (Misplaced Pages:Administrators' noticeboard/IncidentArchive123#User:Ryan4). He appears to have learned nothing from the experience and has now brought a mediation case, singling me out for some reason. See Misplaced Pages:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-31 ChrisO. Given your previous intervention in the matter, I've added you as an involved party. My response is at Misplaced Pages talk:Mediation Cabal/Cases/2007-03-31 ChrisO#ChrisO. Naturally I think the whole thing's a waste of time and I'm encouraging the mediator to dump it on the grounds of Ryan4's bad faith, but it would be helpful if you could add a comment or two so that we can have a record of where things stand. Unfortunately I don't think this will be the last we'll hear from the hirhome fan club - Ryan4 now appears to be coordinating with fellow hirhomers. -- ChrisO 18:46, 18 April 2007 (UTC)
3RRhello I have made 4 edits in these articles during the day: Račak incident and Gazimestan speech because of disruptive edits by the user Nikola Smolenski. I hope I will not get blocked. Can I do anything to avoid blocking? Thank you in advance --Noah30 13:17, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
HelloThe reason i asked Nikola for help is that he is more familiar with the rules of wiki, so i figured he could help me with which ways to go do deal with this users. There are now 3 ip:s changing almost the exact same articles, 124.186.125.166, 124.185.183.180 and 124.186.124.51. One of these edits include putting up a picture of User:Ivan Kricancics brother on Smith's (potato chips). The ip:s are also from Queensland, Australia the same state in which Ivan is from. Paulcicero 13:57, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
Noah's ArkKC, Codex placed a tag on the article stating that it is part of WikiProject:Religion: it is not see (http://en.wikipedia.org/search/?title=User_talk:Codex_Sinaiticus&diff=124480781&oldid=124478512). I'm out of reverts -- if you would, could you remove his tag? •Jim62sch• 11:57, 21 April 2007 (UTC) PBA Act articlesThere's been an upsurge in activity on Partial-Birth Abortion Ban Act, Intact dilation and extraction, Gonzales v. Carhart, and Abortion in the wake of the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision, which was featured on "In the news" on the Main page. We've got our hands full, and and we could use another set of eyes watching over things, if you've got the time. Thanks! -Severa (!!!) 12:15, 21 April 2007 (UTC) RI MediationI hope that you are feeling better. Will the mediation at RI continue? It seems that the other editors have moved on to completely reorganize the project, while I have waited for mediation to determine the direction of the process. Am I being naive? I noticed that the limitation to registered users was removed today from the main article. Thanks. --Kevin Murray 16:52, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
HealthGet better! --PaxEquilibrium 19:10, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Big timeYou're right, I do owe you! Sorry for dragging you into the Gil-White business. I'm still rather taken aback at Nikola's position on the issue - it's obtuse even for him. Never mind though - I think he's got the message now. Thanks for your assistance, best wishes for your health and I promise not to tax you too hard in the future. :-) -- ChrisO 19:22, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
Račak incidentRačak incident User Nikola Smolenski is making disruptive and POV edits in this article Račak incident. Some days ago you asked him to stop but he is back and continues with the same. Can you talk to him once again? --Noah30 15:38, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
DMOZ Section on WP:ELI just reverted your edit to the WP:EL page - there is an ongoing discussion on the Talk page about whether this section which has been in for several months, should stay or be changed. I don't feel we should make changes to the page until those discussions have been resolved. Would welcome your input to that discussion. Thanks. -- Alucard (Dr.) | Talk 18:50, 24 April 2007 (UTC)
Dear Puppy!Get well soon,my dear Puppy!Dear Puppy, it's so great to see you again! When I saw your message, I felt like jumping out of sheer happiness ;) So many things have happened since we last saw each other that I promise to update you asap via email, sounds ok? My happiness, however, has diminished by seeing that you're not doing well because of health problems. Please, take good care of yourself - will you, dear? We all love you and wish that you get well soon. Don't hesitate to message me if you wish to relax and watch over your page, or anything else you may need. Love you Puppy! :) I'll email you soon - meanwhile, please rest and get well, and once again, thank you for your beautiful words ;) Phaedriel - 11:53, 25 April 2007 (UTC) Thanks you, sweetie!Thanks for the wonderful gift, Puppy - you touched me! :) I swear it'll have a place of honor on my userpage ;) It's great to see you again! How's your health, sweetie? Feeling better, I hope? Phaedriel - 01:11, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
Good puppyWhat the heck was that all about on the Noah's Ark article? Thanks for your support. If I was being uncivil, please tell me, but that was one odd conversation and accusation. Orangemarlin 23:14, 30 April 2007 (UTC)
|