| Revision as of 23:33, 1 May 2007 editJohn (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users214,956 edits Draft← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:42, 1 May 2007 edit undoMorton devonshire (talk | contribs)6,576 edits →I'll be back: Don't go Lassie, don't go!Next edit → | ||
| Line 58: | Line 58: | ||
| : For future reference, my GoodByes are of the "Sincere but impossible" type. There is such possibility here, if only people would do thing the right way. ] - ] 16:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | : For future reference, my GoodByes are of the "Sincere but impossible" type. There is such possibility here, if only people would do thing the right way. ] - ] 16:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::i think you know when to walk away, coming back after a rest is not a problem. Finding a new home for serious editing is also a good thing. The terminator reference was more directed to the fact you return when needed, as opposed to your inability to say goodbye :). ] ] 16:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | ::i think you know when to walk away, coming back after a rest is not a problem. Finding a new home for serious editing is also a good thing. The terminator reference was more directed to the fact you return when needed, as opposed to your inability to say goodbye :). ] ] 16:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| For , you're my new frickin' hero. In true Meatball Wiki fashion, I will say it: "don't go.” Better yet, just get a new user name, keep editing, and don’t let other people know who you used to be. Cheers. </font><small><span style="border: 1px solid #F06A0F">]]</span></small><font color="#ffffff"> · </font> 23:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC) | |||
| == Draft == | == Draft == | ||
Revision as of 23:42, 1 May 2007
| This talk page is automatically archived by Werdnabot. Any sections older than 7 days are automatically archived to User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Dec07. Sections without timestamps are not archived - please sign your posts with four ~'s |
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jun06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jul06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Aug06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Sep06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Oct06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Nov06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Dec06
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Jan07
User talk:Hipocrite/Archive/Feb07
From someones user page
Someone I once respected had something like this on their user page:
Defend each other!This is amazing! It sums up how we can use conflicts to build our community instead of letting them tear us apart. I recommend that everyone read it.
When I think about being asked to attack the contributions of a valued editor that he made under duress in error over half a year ago, I wonder if it's best for me to even comment on that, or to focus on, oh, retaining the valuable users of the encyclopedia who have done everything possible to prevent disruptive POV-trolls from inserting garabge into the encyclopeda. Actually, I don't have to think that long. Have you considered asking the user who put that on their user page if they would stand up for User:MONGO when he was being relentlessly pursued by a single purpose POV pusher? Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:37, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nice, that's a fair point. I don't think that my actions are incompatible with supporting MONGO though; it might be interesting for you to read what I wrote on Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/MONGO#Outside view by Guinnog and on Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for arbitration/Seabhcan#Statement by User:Guinnog. I like MONGO, as I have said already in this RfC. I do think though that some of the actions he and his supporters have taken are incompatible with a harmonious and collegiate editing environment. This example from last August shows (at least to me) that there has been some pretty poor behaviour in the past from anti-CT folks, all done I grant absolutely from good motives. As soon as we can establish that normal Misplaced Pages rules apply even on 9/11-related articles, we will have made progress here. Incidentally, do you support the vandalism that was done to the article template, without for the moment commenting on the presumed motives behind it? --Guinnog 15:59, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nothing you can do will get me to comment on anything that happened before the last time MOONGO was dragged by a POV-pusher or Encyclopedia Dramatica troll in front of either the community or the ArbCom. September of 2006 is long, long gone. Normal wikipedia rules certainly do apply - which is why I am shocked that you have not blocked the Rootology sock, or the disruptive single-purpose POV-pushing revert warriors yet. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:05, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- If you have any specific concerns about sockpuppets or a particular problematic editor, please feel free to share them with me and I will see what I can do. Thanks for the messages, you made a good point. However, I think there are more POV-pushers and single-purpose accounts out there than you perhaps realise. Best wishes. --Guinnog 16:15, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
I'll be back
Did you ever consider changing your name to terminator? ;) David D. (Talk) 16:26, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- I have a meatball:GoodBye problem. The first step is recognizing it! Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:30, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- For future reference, my GoodByes are of the "Sincere but impossible" type. There is such possibility here, if only people would do thing the right way. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:32, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
- i think you know when to walk away, coming back after a rest is not a problem. Finding a new home for serious editing is also a good thing. The terminator reference was more directed to the fact you return when needed, as opposed to your inability to say goodbye :). David D. (Talk) 16:41, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
For this, you're my new frickin' hero. In true Meatball Wiki fashion, I will say it: "don't go.” Better yet, just get a new user name, keep editing, and don’t let other people know who you used to be. Cheers. MortonDevonshire Yo · 23:42, 1 May 2007 (UTC)
Draft
I accepted your challenge; what do you think? Talk:September 11, 2001 attacks#Draft --Guinnog 23:33, 1 May 2007 (UTC)