Misplaced Pages

User talk:AngryParsley: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:31, 17 April 2005 editAngryParsley (talk | contribs)390 editsm User page vandalism← Previous edit Revision as of 07:31, 29 April 2005 edit undoDavenbelle (talk | contribs)3,206 edits [] edited your post againNext edit →
(4 intermediate revisions by 3 users not shown)
Line 27: Line 27:
::Oh...do you want me to stop reverting? Should I block if they continue? -]|] 23:29, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) ::Oh...do you want me to stop reverting? Should I block if they continue? -]|] 23:29, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
:::Nah, it's cool. ] 23:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC) :::Nah, it's cool. ] 23:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

== ] edited your post ==

fyi: your post has been . — ] 17:33, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)
:Thanks for telling me. This is the first time anyone has edited one of my posts. It's unusual, because he actually did say that to me on IRC:
<pre>
Apr 25 14:25:00 <AngryParsley> no, a harsh lesson in internet injustice
Apr 25 14:25:13 <Cool_Cat> AngryParsley I designed the internet
Apr 25 14:25:18 <AngryParsley> s/lesson/instruction
Apr 25 14:25:22 <Cool_Cat> ok partialy
Apr 25 14:25:32 <JRM> Cool_Cat> Are you Al Gore?
Apr 25 14:25:33 <AngryParsley> Cool_Cat: along with al gore?
Apr 25 14:25:36 <AngryParsley> efb
Apr 25 14:25:41 <Cool_Cat> no
Apr 25 14:25:55 <Cool_Cat> I designed some hardware in infrastructure
Apr 25 14:26:01 <Cool_Cat> Sisco devices
Apr 25 14:26:16 <AngryParsley> Cool_Cat: I'd believe you, but you spelled Cisco incorrectly
Apr 25 14:26:25 <Cool_Cat> I dont care
</pre>

: Now he's done it again. &mdash;&nbsp;] 07:31, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

== Pandeism vfd ==

Please consider revising the basis for your vote on ] to "non-notable." I believe I have adduced sufficient referential evidence to show that this article was not "original research," but simply an exposition on a philosophy which, although real, lacks enough adherents/proponents to be notable enough for inclusion. I apologize for having overestimated the importance of this topic. It was, after all, one of my first posts, when I was new to Misplaced Pages and not yet familiar with the criteria for notability. --] ] 04:43, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)
*On second though, since its very easy for those not acquainted with religous details to confuse "theism" with "deism" - as demonstrated by the fact that most of the non-wiki-mirror references on the web do use pandeism to mean ] - a redirect would be useful. --] ] 06:41, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)

Revision as of 07:31, 29 April 2005

Thank you

WikiCookie for you!
WikiCookie for you!

You receive a WikiCookie for your efforts. - Mark 14:02, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

That's good enough for me. - AngryParsley 14:20, 7 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Wiki, wiki, wiki starts with W! Rad Racer 18:11, 29 Mar 2005 (UTC)

PrankStar

Just a quick heads-up: your PrankStar is getting some attention over at Misplaced Pages talk:Barnstars on Misplaced Pages. You might want to check it out. – ClockworkSoul 06:10, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for the heads-up. AngryParsley (too lazy to add the time & date)
Too lazy to type ~~~~? Striker 03:23, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Oh fuck, this is easy. AngryParsley 05:09, 16 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Mwahahaha

I have stolen your page layout, and there's nothing you can do about it! Bwahaha! Thanks. -- Kizor 09:37, 18 Mar 2005 (UTC)

Hah, copied is more like it. If you stole my car, I would be pissed. If you made a copy of my car, I would warn you that the CD player is broken. That reminds me, I should check the oil in my car. AngryParsley 22:11, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Update: Oh jeez! I was two quarts low! If you hadn't stolen my user page I could have had a very expensive repair bill. AngryParsley 23:00, 23 Mar 2005 (UTC)
Always glad to help. Thanks for noting the mistake, too, I've fixed it now. -- Kizor 19:42, 26 Mar 2005 (UTC)

User page vandalism

A couple anons vandalized your user page, so I reverted them. Just wanted to let you know :) -Frazzydee| 23:25, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Yeah, I know, thanks. I'm chatting with them on IRC right now. It's a bit of a joke. AngryParsley 23:27, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Oh...do you want me to stop reverting? Should I block if they continue? -Frazzydee| 23:29, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Nah, it's cool. AngryParsley 23:31, 17 Apr 2005 (UTC)

User:Coolcat edited your post

fyi: your post has been edited. — Davenbelle 17:33, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC)

Thanks for telling me. This is the first time anyone has edited one of my posts. It's unusual, because he actually did say that to me on IRC:
Apr 25 14:25:00 <AngryParsley> no, a harsh lesson in internet injustice
Apr 25 14:25:13 <Cool_Cat> AngryParsley I designed the internet
Apr 25 14:25:18 <AngryParsley> s/lesson/instruction
Apr 25 14:25:22 <Cool_Cat> ok partialy
Apr 25 14:25:32 <JRM> Cool_Cat> Are you Al Gore?
Apr 25 14:25:33 <AngryParsley> Cool_Cat: along with al gore?
Apr 25 14:25:36 <AngryParsley> efb
Apr 25 14:25:41 <Cool_Cat> no
Apr 25 14:25:55 <Cool_Cat> I designed some hardware in infrastructure
Apr 25 14:26:01 <Cool_Cat> Sisco devices
Apr 25 14:26:16 <AngryParsley> Cool_Cat: I'd believe you, but you spelled Cisco incorrectly
Apr 25 14:26:25 <Cool_Cat> I dont care
Now he's done it again. — Davenbelle 07:31, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC)

Pandeism vfd

Please consider revising the basis for your vote on Misplaced Pages:Votes for deletion/Pandeism to "non-notable." I believe I have adduced sufficient referential evidence to show that this article was not "original research," but simply an exposition on a philosophy which, although real, lacks enough adherents/proponents to be notable enough for inclusion. I apologize for having overestimated the importance of this topic. It was, after all, one of my first posts, when I was new to Misplaced Pages and not yet familiar with the criteria for notability. -- 8^D BDAbramson 04:43, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)

  • On second though, since its very easy for those not acquainted with religous details to confuse "theism" with "deism" - as demonstrated by the fact that most of the non-wiki-mirror references on the web do use pandeism to mean pantheism - a redirect would be useful. -- 8^D BDAbramson 06:41, 2005 Apr 29 (UTC)