Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:14, 13 May 2007

P.S. Obviously uncivil comments will be expunged with extreme prejudice.

Peer review TamilNet

Thanks for all your comments, I had incorportaed them all and more RaveenS 19:25, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

Can I impose another one on you ?

Only if you had the timesee here Your input will be appreciated. Thanks RaveenS 02:02, 19 April 2007 (UTC)

Blue Planet

Agreed. I've enhanced my thesis (see also ) Alex Spade 18:40, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

Asteroid belt GA on hold

 GA on hold — Notes left on talk page. Nehrams2020 23:40, 1 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks and Question

Thanks for posting some suggestions for the article Kentucky at WP:PR. Also, I noticed that you'd made a comment on the culture section. Well, now, the culture section somehow ended up towards the bottom of the page, below the references section, and it does not show up when you try to edit it. Could you try to see what's wrong with it, because I can't find the source of the problem. Thanks again for the suggestions, and good luck editing. Cool Blue 00:25, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Sorry but I didn't seem to have a problem opening that section for editing. Perhaps it was reverted? You might check the history tab on that page to find out. — RJH (talk) 14:37, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

stub for Michael Fishbane

Thanks for looking at this. I added a few but sufficient sources. Also, put it in a specific category. I then removed the uncateg and unreferenced templates. Is that ok and proper procedure? thanks, HG 19:36, 2 May 2007 (UTC) Rsvp

That works for me. Thank you. — RJH (talk) 19:46, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Science Collaboration of the month

You voted for The current science collaboration of the month article is: Chemistry Please help improve this article to featured article quality standards. Last month's collaboration was European science in the Middle Ages. To propose future collaborations, please contribute here! v t e and this article is now the current Science Collaboration of the Month! Please help to improve it to match the quality of an ideal Misplaced Pages science article.

NCurse _work 21:07, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Kentucky

Well, it doesn't appear to be there anymore, nor does it show it on any archived version of the page. But the whole thing was filled with software malfunctions when I read the page. It might have been my computer, or the software might have been malfunctioning. Anyways, thanks for reviewing the article, and reviewing the problem. Cool Blue 00:21, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

It could have been a problem with Misplaced Pages's back-end MySQL database. Sometimes Misplaced Pages just gets a little flakey. Usually it gets cleared up, but I suspect a DBA is probably resetting (or restarting) something in the background. — RJH (talk) 15:36, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Historical Miniatures

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Historical Miniatures, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Misplaced Pages's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Misplaced Pages is not" and Misplaced Pages's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. The original editor made no other contributions and you wikified it, so not sure if you want to try to save it. Ruhrfisch 20:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for the notice. I have no particular heartburn about that page going away, since the topic is covered elsewhere. — RJH (talk) 21:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

You are very welcome - thanks for the quick reply. Ruhrfisch 21:10, 3 May 2007 (UTC)

Starbox

On this template's discussion page and others related says "Template is now described on the Starbox page instead of here". where is the Starbox page? Only that. (comu_nacho from spanish wiki)

Oh that just meant the template is described on {{Starbox catalog}} rather than Template_talk:Starbox_catalogSorry for the confusion. — RJH (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Night Sky - Time in astronomy?

What does the article Night Sky have to do with the category time in astronomy? --Keflavich 19:01, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Nothing, except it is discussing astronomy and an interval of time. But if that is objectionable then I guess category:Observational astronomy would be sufficient. — RJH (talk) 19:04, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Touché, I hadn't even considered night as being an interval of time. However, I do think observational astronomy is more appropriate, since time in astronomy generally refers to more precise measurements than night and day. --Keflavich 19:07, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Milky Way

I apologize for stepping on your toes. —Viriditas | Talk 04:19, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

My apologies as well. We obviously differing viewpoints that I'm sure can be resolved. Thank you. — RJH (talk) 18:11, 13 May 2007 (UTC)