Misplaced Pages

User talk:Raggz: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 02:33, 20 May 2007 editRaggz (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users5,711 edits Comments← Previous edit Revision as of 14:59, 20 May 2007 edit undoSideshow Bob Roberts (talk | contribs)1,011 edits unsourced material - second user warningNext edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
== Comments == == Unsourced material ==
{{{icon|] }}}Please do not add content without ] ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, as you did to ]}}. If you would like to experiment, please use the ]. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-unsourced2 -->

I'm genuinely reluctant to give you another warning, but you've deleted my previous comments here and you continue to insert controversial statements into articles without adequately referencing them.

When you cite a reference, you must ensure that your source actually states what you claim it states. You have to ], but the sources you cite do not explicitly support your claims. For example, neither Grossman nor the UN Charter states that ''“The United Nations however has jurisdiction over all citizens of all of the UN member nations, so there are no nation's citizens who are exempt from international law”'' or that ''“The key jurisdictional issue that would prevent the ICC from exercising jurisdiction over aggression is that the ICC Statute gives the ICC the ] to define and punish the crime of “aggression,” which is solely the prerogative of the ] under the ]”''.

You keep adding an to Grossman's speech. It's clear you haven't even read the speech, so it is inappropriate for you to use it as a source.

Please remove or find a reliable source that explicitly supports them. ] 14:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:59, 20 May 2007

Unsourced material

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.

I'm genuinely reluctant to give you another warning, but you've deleted my previous comments here and you continue to insert controversial statements into articles without adequately referencing them.

When you cite a reference, you must ensure that your source actually states what you claim it states. You have added several controversial claims to The International Criminal Court and the 2003 invasion of Iraq, but the sources you cite do not explicitly support your claims. For example, neither Grossman nor the UN Charter states that “The United Nations however has jurisdiction over all citizens of all of the UN member nations, so there are no nation's citizens who are exempt from international law” or that “The key jurisdictional issue that would prevent the ICC from exercising jurisdiction over aggression is that the ICC Statute gives the ICC the authority to define and punish the crime of “aggression,” which is solely the prerogative of the Security Council of the United Nations under the U.N. Charter.

You keep adding an outdated link to Grossman's speech. It's clear you haven't even read the speech, so it is inappropriate for you to use it as a source.

Please remove your claims or find a reliable source that explicitly supports them. Sideshow Bob Roberts 14:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)