| Revision as of 01:07, 5 May 2005 editZen-master (talk | contribs)5,220 edits Misplaced Pages:Conspiracy theory← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:18, 5 May 2005 edit undoFuckSlimVirgin (talk | contribs)1 edit Fuck You you little shitheadNext edit → | ||
| Line 98: | Line 98: | ||
| I am careful about 3RR, I come near it often because I don't use sock puppets. Can I ask you a related question on WP policy? I created a separate section containing Cberlet's original post on the "conspiracy theory" title issue on that discussion page. He is trying to remove both the section he subsequently edited and his original section that I had recreated in a separate section, is that kosher? In a discussion elsewhere on the page I attempt to refute items in his original post that aren't in the post he subsequently modified. So I believe the bottom most section of what he was trying to remove should be kept because it is relevant to the discussion and I believe I have properly described that section as being "cberlet's original post on the issue". I'd prefer a neutral person to just resolve this minor side dispute that is indeed a detriment to making progress towards consensus on the larger "conspiracy theory" title neutrality issue. What do you think? ] ] 01:07, 5 May 2005 (UTC) | I am careful about 3RR, I come near it often because I don't use sock puppets. Can I ask you a related question on WP policy? I created a separate section containing Cberlet's original post on the "conspiracy theory" title issue on that discussion page. He is trying to remove both the section he subsequently edited and his original section that I had recreated in a separate section, is that kosher? In a discussion elsewhere on the page I attempt to refute items in his original post that aren't in the post he subsequently modified. So I believe the bottom most section of what he was trying to remove should be kept because it is relevant to the discussion and I believe I have properly described that section as being "cberlet's original post on the issue". I'd prefer a neutral person to just resolve this minor side dispute that is indeed a detriment to making progress towards consensus on the larger "conspiracy theory" title neutrality issue. What do you think? ] ] 01:07, 5 May 2005 (UTC) | ||
| == Fuck You you little shithead == | |||
| between your first message on my userpage ] and your last message, I MADE NO EDITS! You are just another one of Misplaced Pages's abusive obnoxious assholes Like Jayjg, jpgordon, and Zscout370! FUCK YOU!--] 04:18, 5 May 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 04:18, 5 May 2005
| Imagine a world in which every person has free access to the sum of all human knowledge. That's what we're doing. |
|
snow-coat.jpg) Education is the ability to listen to almost anything without losing your temper. — Robert Frost Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5 Archive 6 Archive 7 Archive 8 Archive 9 Archive 10 Archive 11 RequestCould you please take a look at Talk:The_Matrix#MIM_review? Thanks. AndyL 17:41, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) PA imagesJust a note, the British (and any Canadian ones) are Crown Copyright, not public domain. Burgundavia 05:12, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) New Template:JudaismI've started a little project at Misplaced Pages:Sandbox/Template:Judaism as you can see...please help out in any way you can, or tell me why I should just stop it. :-p Tomer 17:56, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) Nation of Islam and anti-SemitismI am getting sick and tired of our anonymous AOL IP editor running roughshod over the Nation of Islam and anti-Semitism article while refusing to participate in any sort of consensus building on the Talk: page. Is there something that can be done about it? Jayjg 04:50, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) User:69.217.194.44This user just wrote this to me: "The two IP's are totally different. They are not the same user. The abuse depends on who is performing it and who receives it. David Cannon has abused this user. SlimVirgin has abused this user also. The so-called abuse cuts both ways." Below is what I wrote which this user is responding to:
Jesus help?If you have time can you check out ? I am trying to figure out what to do about this. Slrubenstein | Talk 18:12, 1 May 2005 (UTC)
SuperDudeThank you SO much for the kind words on my talk page. It seems that SuperDude really is getting the hang of editing here! Best, Lucky 6.9 23:54, 1 May 2005 (UTC) Funkily yoursDear Slim, where do I... how can I even begin to thank you? I probably would have been gone long ago had it not been for you. And now, somehow, with your pivotal support, here I am, an administrator! Who would have thunk it? Happy May Day, and all the very best to you, El_C 00:31, 2 May 2005 (UTC) ThanksHey Slim, thanks for reverting my user page. I'm amused that we often end up chasing the same vandal—and reverting each others user pages as we go! — Knowledge Seeker দ 02:55, 2 May 2005 (UTC) Revert of Cambridge UniversityHi, I think that the section about assorted alumni should not contain more than 15 to 20 world-famous alumni. This means that it cannot list that many contemporary actors, comedians and writers. This is why I removed them. WHat do you think? — Richie 16:41, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
WittgensteinHi, I did include the beetle in the box reference from the text directly. I don´t have it with me right now, so I can´t cite it accurately. I apologize for the trouble, I´m new at this wikipedia business. What´s the procedure like, for future reference?. Hope things get resolved. Jorge Conspiracy/ComplicityHi, I just posted a message here: Talk:9/11_domestic_conspiracy_theory where I point out that a tiny handful of folks are bouncing from page to page renaming pages and asking for votes on titles as a way to circumvent an ongoing discussion that has been going on for months. Is there a way to facilitate a discussion on one special page to try to resolve the title question that will affect many pages? The details are on the linked page. Thanks for all your hard work. --Cberlet 19:15, 2 May 2005 (UTC)
User:N-ManHi Slim, could you please help me as I want to move 3 pages that've just been moved by a vandal it seems. Fuck Scooterboy from Scooterby, Fuck Linda Dano from Linda Dano and Fuck Collect call from Collect Call. I tried but it won't let me, and I think it should be done ASAP. Thanks.--Silversmith 10:05, 3 May 2005 (UTC) Ok, mostly cleaned up now. --Silversmith 10:17, 3 May 2005 (UTC) help!Please look at this and comment. To get the full background, you will need to look at this too Slrubenstein | Talk 16:21, 3 May 2005 (UTC) John Birch SocietyThe page is once again being targeted by someone who just keeps reverting back to a version that is POV and not factual. Usually from IP 63.134.129.xxx but there have been others. This is an attempt to promote the JBS view--and the page has made great progress toward NPOV. Still room for improvement, but the anon reverter won't go to the talk page. Any suggestions? --Cberlet 15:59, 4 May 2005 (UTC) D.C. wiki meetHey, Slim. :) No, I had no idea. Thanks for the info, but this weekend is probably the worst time in recent memory, schedule-wise, for me. How do I find out about such events in the future (hopefully, with a little more lead time)? deeceevoice 23:50, 4 May 2005 (UTC) Misplaced Pages:Conspiracy theoryI am careful about 3RR, I come near it often because I don't use sock puppets. Can I ask you a related question on WP policy? I created a separate section containing Cberlet's original post on the "conspiracy theory" title issue on that discussion page. He is trying to remove both the section he subsequently edited and his original section that I had recreated in a separate section, is that kosher? In a discussion elsewhere on the page I attempt to refute items in his original post that aren't in the post he subsequently modified. So I believe the bottom most section of what he was trying to remove should be kept because it is relevant to the discussion and I believe I have properly described that section as being "cberlet's original post on the issue". I'd prefer a neutral person to just resolve this minor side dispute that is indeed a detriment to making progress towards consensus on the larger "conspiracy theory" title neutrality issue. What do you think? zen master T 01:07, 5 May 2005 (UTC) Fuck You you little shitheadbetween your first message on my userpage User:Tagteam213 and your last message, I MADE NO EDITS! You are just another one of Misplaced Pages's abusive obnoxious assholes Like Jayjg, jpgordon, and Zscout370! FUCK YOU!--FuckSlimVirgin 04:18, 5 May 2005 (UTC) |
