Revision as of 21:11, 23 May 2007 editRosicrucian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,751 edits ICP Album Certifications← Previous edit | Revision as of 18:17, 24 May 2007 edit undoRosicrucian (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers2,751 edits →ICP Album CertificationsNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
<small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)| 21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | <small>—The preceding ] comment was added by ] (] • ]){{#if:21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)| 21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC)|}}.</small><!-- Template:Unsigned --> | ||
:Not according to the RIAA's website which displays the certifications they've handed out. Sorry.--] 21:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | :Not according to the RIAA's website which displays the certifications they've handed out. Sorry.--] 21:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
{{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Insane Clown Posse|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:We have to go with the for certifications. Please don't edit war.--] 18:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)|We have to go with the for certifications. Please don't edit war.--] 18:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> |
Revision as of 18:17, 24 May 2007
The article Alex Hartmen has been or soon will be deleted from Misplaced Pages. This happened because the article seems to be about a subject but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. You might also want to read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 7 under Articles. FreplySpang 18:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks on other people as you did at Masion Mcintire. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages are not tolerated by Misplaced Pages and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create such pages will be blocked from editing by administrators or banned by the arbitration committee. Thank you. Mytildebang 18:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
Please do not delete content on your page sir.--Sir james paul 17:25, 16 December 2006 (UTC)
Your recent article contributions - Moopsiface, Adam Dolph, Black Hand Entertainment - do not meet our standards of notability. Please review our guide to your first article for a general overview of what kinds of articles we do or do not accept. For more detailed explanations, you may wish to see our standards for articles about companies and our standards for articles about people. FreplySpang 18:31, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Also, be aware that we strongly discourage people from writing about themselves or their own projects, because it is difficult to be objective. See our page on autobiographies and our page on conflict of interest for more details. FreplySpang 18:33, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Black Hand Entertainment
A tag has been placed on Black Hand Entertainment, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Misplaced Pages. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Misplaced Pages. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}}
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Mr.Z-mantalk¢Review! 00:21, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
ICP Album Certifications
WHAT THE FUCK IS YOUR PROBLEM!?!?!?! the 4th and 5th Joker cards are PLATNUIM. bitch —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Marioemily101 (talk • contribs) 21:08, 23 May 2007 (UTC).
- Not according to the RIAA's website which displays the certifications they've handed out. Sorry.--Rosicrucian 21:11, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Insane Clown Posse. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. We have to go with the RIAA website for certifications. Please don't edit war.--Rosicrucian 18:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)