| Revision as of 17:52, 26 May 2007 editSevera (talk | contribs)15,365 edits Rv. 3 editors have expressed concerns over this description at Talk:Fetal pain. There is no consensus for this at that article, so there's no consensus for it here. Please seek consensus first.← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:46, 26 May 2007 edit undoAnythingyouwant (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Template editors91,251 edits Rewriting section on abortion. Please see discussion page.Next edit → | ||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
| This Royal College was founded as the '''British College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists''' in 1929 by Professor ] and Sir ]. It was granted a ] on ] ].<ref> Retrieved ].</ref> It has as its object "The encouragement of the study and the advancement of the science and practice of obstetrics and gynaecology", although its governing documents impose no specific restrictions on its operation.<ref>RCOG, (]). Retrieved ].</ref> Its offices are near ] in ]. | This Royal College was founded as the '''British College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists''' in 1929 by Professor ] and Sir ]. It was granted a ] on ] ].<ref> Retrieved ].</ref> It has as its object "The encouragement of the study and the advancement of the science and practice of obstetrics and gynaecology", although its governing documents impose no specific restrictions on its operation.<ref>RCOG, (]). Retrieved ].</ref> Its offices are near ] in ]. | ||
| In the United Kingdom, RCOG takes a ] position against "reduction in the time limits for abortion."<ref>Abortion Rights, (]). Retrieved ].</ref> <ref>Hennessy, Patrick and Donnelly, Laura. , ''Sunday Telegraph'' (]). Retrieved ].</ref> According to RCOG, ] "is an essential part of women's healthcare services and adequate investment and workforce is essential."<ref> Retrieved ].</ref> | |||
| On ] ], the college submitted a proposal to the ] calling for consideration of permitting the ] of ] ].<ref>Templeton, Sarah-Kate. , ''Sunday Times'' (]). Retrieved ].</ref> The proposal states, "We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns." | On ] ], the college submitted a proposal to the ] calling for consideration of permitting the ] of ] ].<ref>Templeton, Sarah-Kate. , ''Sunday Times'' (]). Retrieved ].</ref> The proposal states, "We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns." | ||
Revision as of 21:46, 26 May 2007
The Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) is a professional association based in England. Its members, including people with and without medical degrees, work in the field of obstetrics and gynaecology worldwide. RCOG is dedicated to "improving sexual and reproductive healthcare worldwide", and just over half of its 11,000 members live outside Britain, spread among 83 other countries.
This Royal College was founded as the British College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists in 1929 by Professor William Blair-Bell and Sir William Fletcher Shaw. It was granted a Royal Charter on 21 March 1947. It has as its object "The encouragement of the study and the advancement of the science and practice of obstetrics and gynaecology", although its governing documents impose no specific restrictions on its operation. Its offices are near Regent's Park in central London.
In the United Kingdom, RCOG takes a pro-choice position against "reduction in the time limits for abortion." According to RCOG, abortion "is an essential part of women's healthcare services and adequate investment and workforce is essential."
On 5 November 2006, the college submitted a proposal to the Nuffield Council on Bioethics calling for consideration of permitting the euthanasia of disabled newborns. The proposal states, "We would like the working party to think more radically about non-resuscitation, withdrawal of treatment decisions, the best interests test and active euthanasia as they are ways of widening the management options available to the sickest of newborns."
References
- RCOG, "Summary of Membership Categories". Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- RCOG, "International Office Strategy." Retrieved 2007-05-25.
- RCOG, "International". Retrieved 2007-05-25.
- Privy Council web site. Retrieved 2007-05-25.
- RCOG, "Annual Report and Accounts" (2005-12-31). Retrieved 2007-05-25.
- Abortion Rights, "Government robustly rejects minority push for abortion law review" (2006-07-04). Retrieved 2007-05-25.
- Hennessy, Patrick and Donnelly, Laura. "MPs prepare for abortion fight", Sunday Telegraph (2007-05-07). Retrieved 2007-05-26.
- "RCOG statement on article 'Abortion crisis as doctors refuse to perform surgery' (Independent, 16 April 2007)." Retrieved 2007-05-25.
- Templeton, Sarah-Kate. "Doctors: let us kill disabled babies", Sunday Times (2006-11-05). Retrieved 2007-05-25.