Revision as of 20:54, 30 May 2007 editTony Sidaway (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers81,722 edits →Renamed: The previous article name was that of a four-month-old baby. Please add this to the arbitration case if you wish to dispute Misplaced Pages's right to act on such concerns.← Previous edit | Revision as of 20:56, 30 May 2007 edit undoBdj (talk | contribs)19,739 edits →Renamed: rNext edit → | ||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
::Name them. Support your claim or I'll revert back again. --] <small>]</small> 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | ::Name them. Support your claim or I'll revert back again. --] <small>]</small> 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::: The previous article name was that of a four-month-old baby. Please add this to the arbitration case if you wish to dispute Misplaced Pages's right to act on such concerns. --] 20:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | ::: The previous article name was that of a four-month-old baby. Please add this to the arbitration case if you wish to dispute Misplaced Pages's right to act on such concerns. --] 20:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::"Four month old baby" is not part of BLP. Again, what justification are you using - if you want to add it to ArbCom go right ahead, but that simply avoids the question. Two separate people are questioning your activity here. --] <small>]</small> 20:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:56, 30 May 2007
Biography Stub‑class | |||||||
|
Renamed
I've renamed this article back to Baby 81 (its original name) and removed all references to the child's real name, for obvious reasons. --Tony Sidaway 14:03, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- What obvious reasons are those, Tony? --badlydrawnjeff talk 14:17, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
This is a little bizarre, when a google search for "Baby 81" finds BBC reports like these plus dozens more from other (non-Misplaced Pages-derived) sources.
Is this child's name a secret? Are we not permitted to have articles on minors now? -- ALoan (Talk) 16:40, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- That's what some would like. I'm reverting this. --badlydrawnjeff talk 16:49, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Do not move this article on a minor back to the name of the minor, or add the name of the minor to the article. There are serious Biographies of living persons concerns here. --Tony Sidaway 20:29, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Name them. Support your claim or I'll revert back again. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- The previous article name was that of a four-month-old baby. Please add this to the arbitration case if you wish to dispute Misplaced Pages's right to act on such concerns. --Tony Sidaway 20:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- "Four month old baby" is not part of BLP. Again, what justification are you using - if you want to add it to ArbCom go right ahead, but that simply avoids the question. Two separate people are questioning your activity here. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:56, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- The previous article name was that of a four-month-old baby. Please add this to the arbitration case if you wish to dispute Misplaced Pages's right to act on such concerns. --Tony Sidaway 20:54, 30 May 2007 (UTC)
- Name them. Support your claim or I'll revert back again. --badlydrawnjeff talk 20:42, 30 May 2007 (UTC)