Revision as of 03:42, 7 May 2005 editYuber (talk | contribs)4,476 editsm →[], [], []← Previous edit | Revision as of 13:30, 7 May 2005 edit undoCodex Sinaiticus (talk | contribs)17,640 edits →Why do you consider BCE offensive?Next edit → | ||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
And good job on the Mitanni article, by the way.] | And good job on the Mitanni article, by the way.] | ||
: Thanks for the positive feedback... | |||
: Why BCE is offensive is a long story, not so much the actual initials or what they stand for, it has more to do with antipathy between the parties who would replace BC and AD with BCE and CE... BC and AD were used for centuries, but the newer initials first cropped up in the later 20th C (70's or 80's) in the journals of revisionists and Marxists with a decidedly minimalist bent. Resistance to the change is widespread, quite recently I saw a news article on Google about this very issue raging in Australia, and the uproar was great enough to stop the new-fangled initials from appearing in government schoolbooks. So rest assured, it isn't only myself who would object to their use. Probably safest not to stir up this whole can of worms... --Regards, ] 13:30, 7 May 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 13:30, 7 May 2005
Welcome!
Initial Welcome Letter
Hello, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- If you're ready for the complete list of Misplaced Pages documentation, there's also Misplaced Pages:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Zzyzx11 | Talk 01:58, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Draft Merge of Mitanni article moved to user page
Codex Sinaiticus 04:17, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- A first suggestion: you may find that it works better over the long run to move the proposed draft to a temporary file in your userspace, for example User:Codex Sinaiticus/temp. That way any comments, discussions, etc. are kept separate from communication directed to you about other matters. -- llywrch 17:34, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
- I may end up moving it again if it causes any conflict, but for now it is on the regular user page Codex Sinaiticus 18:26, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Caucasian Albania, Artsakh, Arran (Azerbaijan)
Hi there,
Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Just wanted to quickly thank you for your valuable edits in the above-mentioned three pages and for your willingness to involve yourself "in my dispute with Rovoam" ;-) I don't feel alone in those pages now, and I am grateful to you for being my partner/counterpart in those pages and hopefully in many more pages in future. Bests.--Tabib 18:02, May 3, 2005 (UTC)
Why do you consider BCE offensive?
And good job on the Mitanni article, by the way.Yuber
- Thanks for the positive feedback...
- Why BCE is offensive is a long story, not so much the actual initials or what they stand for, it has more to do with antipathy between the parties who would replace BC and AD with BCE and CE... BC and AD were used for centuries, but the newer initials first cropped up in the later 20th C (70's or 80's) in the journals of revisionists and Marxists with a decidedly minimalist bent. Resistance to the change is widespread, quite recently I saw a news article on Google about this very issue raging in Australia, and the uproar was great enough to stop the new-fangled initials from appearing in government schoolbooks. So rest assured, it isn't only myself who would object to their use. Probably safest not to stir up this whole can of worms... --Regards, Codex Sinaiticus 13:30, 7 May 2005 (UTC)