| Revision as of 16:39, 4 June 2007 editPetercrapsody69 (talk | contribs)82 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:03, 4 June 2007 edit undoOne Night In Hackney (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers32,879 edits 3RR notificationNext edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| Kindly do not keep inserting a photo of yourself into the article when it is against the decision of other editors. It is a blatant ]. If you carry on acting in this way, it is disruptive editing, which will lead to a block until you desist. ] 16:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | Kindly do not keep inserting a photo of yourself into the article when it is against the decision of other editors. It is a blatant ]. If you carry on acting in this way, it is disruptive editing, which will lead to a block until you desist. ] 16:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::As an administrator, I hope you will respond to the arguments described on the ] page. Thank you.] 16:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | ::As an administrator, I hope you will respond to the arguments described on the ] page. Thank you.] 16:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ==3RR== | |||
| {{{icon|] }}}You currently appear to be engaged in an ]{{{{{subst|}}}#if:Fop|  according to the reverts you have made on ]}}. Note that the ] prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the ]. If you continue, you may be ] from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a ] among editors. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-3rr --> <font face="Verdana">]<sub>'']''</sub></font> 19:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 19:03, 4 June 2007
A poor beginning
Perhaps, after insistently reinserting your photo at Fop, you will regain some sense of responsibility and make some positive contributions to Misplaced Pages. I certainly hope so. --Wetman 05:13, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the welcome, Wetman. However, I am making positive contributions to Misplaced Pages. What is your argument for a photograph illustrating a generic concept to be a negative contribution? If you would like to help out in improving the quality of the article, why don't you clean it up and cite some sources? The article's text needs far more attention than the instructive illustration I am providing. Please continue this discussion on the page's discussion page. This is a discussion that is intended to ultimately create a better article, so it should be on that article's discussion page. I'm sure you know the conversation we're having shouldn't be subtly critical of myself and confined to my own personal talk page. If you think about it, this discussion actually has very little to do with me. Petercrapsody69 05:29, 1 June 2007 (UTC)
Fop
Kindly do not keep inserting a photo of yourself into the article when it is against the decision of other editors. It is a blatant conflict of interest. If you carry on acting in this way, it is disruptive editing, which will lead to a block until you desist. Tyrenius 16:37, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- As an administrator, I hope you will respond to the arguments described on the Talk:Fop page. Thank you.Petercrapsody69 16:39, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
3RR
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Fop. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. One Night In Hackney303 19:03, 4 June 2007 (UTC)