Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/Estonian Age of Awakening: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 11:57, 10 June 2007 editGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 edits no threaded talk in the nomination field← Previous edit Revision as of 11:58, 10 June 2007 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 editsNo edit summaryNext edit →
Line 3: Line 3:


:{{la|Estonian Age of Awakening}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude> :{{la|Estonian Age of Awakening}} – <includeonly>(])</includeonly><noinclude>(])</noinclude>
:: I decided to '''withdraw the nomination''', as during the AfD process. --]<sup>]</sup> 11:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC) :: <s> I decided to '''withdraw the nomination''', as during the AfD process. --]<sup>]</sup> 11:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC) </s>
<s>::::I am glad you but need to point out that the difference presented is not mere addition of a source but replacement of an Estonica link with its English translation. ] 11:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)</s> <!--::::I am glad you but need to point out that the difference presented is not mere addition of a source but replacement of an Estonica link with its English translation. ] 11:26, 10 June 2007 (UTC)-->


* . The term has no currency in English-language historical literature. Seems to have been coined by the author of this article. Misplaced Pages is not a proper place for introducing neologisms. --]<sup>]</sup> 20:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC) * . The term has no currency in English-language historical literature. Seems to have been coined by the author of this article. Misplaced Pages is not a proper place for introducing neologisms. --]<sup>]</sup> 20:31, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:58, 10 June 2007

Estonian Age of Awakening

Estonian Age of Awakening (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
I decided to withdraw the nomination, as at least one reference has been provided during the AfD process. --Ghirla 11:18, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
BTW, note the tiny difference in search term and difference in results. --Alexia Death 22:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Search for disparate terms does not prove anything. This is beyond discussion. --Ghirla 22:57, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Look at the first book it points to. It talks about this very period.--Alexia Death 23:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
Also gives to references to "Age of awakening" in the context of Estonians. I hpe this makes you see that I have not made this term up.--Alexia Death 23:04, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong Keep The term is a direct translation from Estonian "Ärkamisaeg". It is used pessistently in estonian literature and history books. google search shows it a lot. I do not understand the desire to remove this stub. IT needs expanding but has nothing that warrants deletion.--Alexia Death 22:49, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
If anything is wrong with the title and the current one is not considered to be proper English term then a move is in order, not an AFD. The period on question is in now way "coined by the author of this article". I learned about it from my history books in school.--Alexia Death 23:00, 9 June 2007 (UTC)
  • I speak both Estonian and English, and I can vouch for 'Age of Awakening' being the translation of 'Ärkamisaeg'. 'Estonian' is a qualifier to distinguish this phenomenon from other Ages of Awakening. The main translation field is (Age|Era|Time|Period) of Awakening|. (Standard BNF rules apply.) Digwuren 09:03, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
This is an English language encyclopaedia. If a wikipedian likes to introduce a new term into English historiography, this constitutes a breach of WP:NOR. No evidence has been presented that the term is notable in English-language publications. --Ghirla 08:11, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
I understand it's the English-language Misplaced Pages, however the point I'm making refers to the fact that the subject matter itself is notable. The exact article title can be hashed out elsewhere (do we want it in Estonian, in the same way as events which are of significance to other nationalities are frequently titled in their languages? Do we want it in English under this title, assuming it to be the best translation from the Estonian original? Do we want it in English and under another title, as a contributor below is arguing, on the grounds that a better translation exists?), but that's not important here. If something is notable, it's notable. It's always better to have English-language sources to prove that in an English-language encyclopedia, but in lieu thereof, sources in a different language which do the same are A-OK. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:37, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
I seriously think that you should actualy ask opinions of other editors before making such hasty moves of actively discussed articles.--Staberinde 11:32, 10 June 2007 (UTC)
Categories: