| Revision as of 10:13, 14 June 2007 editSuva (talk | contribs)1,238 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 11:50, 14 June 2007 edit undoGhirlandajo (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers89,629 edits →[]: keepNext edit → | ||
| Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
| * '''keep''' The guideline on attack says you can comment on the content contributed by a person. Thats what it does. I collects in a satirical fashon the misconseptions of an individual. If the piece would say that Petri Krohn is a soviet glorifier, anti-estonian extremist, engages in denial of soviet crimes against humanity and is just a bad man, then it would be an attack page. Right now its simply a humorous collation of a persons misconseptions.--] 07:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''keep''' The guideline on attack says you can comment on the content contributed by a person. Thats what it does. I collects in a satirical fashon the misconseptions of an individual. If the piece would say that Petri Krohn is a soviet glorifier, anti-estonian extremist, engages in denial of soviet crimes against humanity and is just a bad man, then it would be an attack page. Right now its simply a humorous collation of a persons misconseptions.--] 07:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' baseless accusations. This is just gathering of information, to judge the validity of Petri Krohn's contributions. Compared to Krohn's own user page subpages this material is politically correct, non-offensive and rather useful. ] 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | * '''Keep''' baseless accusations. This is just gathering of information, to judge the validity of Petri Krohn's contributions. Compared to Krohn's own user page subpages this material is politically correct, non-offensive and rather useful. ] 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| * '''Keep''' as a matter of course. We will need this page during the prospective arbitration. I hereby request Digwuren to write about ], preferrably starting a separate page. --]<sup>]</sup> 11:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 11:50, 14 June 2007
User:Digwuren/Petri Krohn's Story of Estonians
Attack page Alex Bakharev 01:41, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- There's nothing attacky with such a compilation. You don't see me going around and tagging things such as User:Petri Krohn/Evidence for deletion. Digwuren 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Speedy keep. The nomination is baseless. Digwuren 06:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- keep. Perhaps Digwuren sould rename it, i.e remove Petri Krohn from title. The satirical piece, however, should remain until mr. Krohn's campaign is allowed to continue.E.J. 07:16, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- The satire part of it is actually not my primary intent. The project began many weeks ago, in the Bronze Soldier of Tallinn controversy, to provide a thorough and systematic view into Petri Krohn's ideas regarding Estonia and History of Estonia. It only seems satirical because the views are so skewed.
- I wouldn't mind extending the scope further, to include ideas of Roobit and Ghirlandajo, actually. They appear to be reasonably mutually consistent, and skewed in the similar manner. Digwuren 09:25, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- keep The guideline on attack says you can comment on the content contributed by a person. Thats what it does. I collects in a satirical fashon the misconseptions of an individual. If the piece would say that Petri Krohn is a soviet glorifier, anti-estonian extremist, engages in denial of soviet crimes against humanity and is just a bad man, then it would be an attack page. Right now its simply a humorous collation of a persons misconseptions.--Alexia Death 07:46, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep baseless accusations. This is just gathering of information, to judge the validity of Petri Krohn's contributions. Compared to Krohn's own user page subpages this material is politically correct, non-offensive and rather useful. Suva 10:13, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- Keep as a matter of course. We will need this page during the prospective arbitration. I hereby request Digwuren to write about Ghirlandajo's Story of Estonians, preferrably starting a separate page. --Ghirla 11:50, 14 June 2007 (UTC)