| Revision as of 08:55, 18 June 2007 editALM scientist (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers7,390 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 12:01, 18 June 2007 edit undoKlaksonn (talk | contribs)630 edits →POV pushing?Next edit → | ||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| : I personally think no article should be created based on just Hadith alone. We should have many secondary sources present in order to start an article and in that article we could use hadith as reference. It is wrong to select few hadith and create article. Hence I wish all of those articles should be deleted. However, it is impossible task now. --- ] 08:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | : I personally think no article should be created based on just Hadith alone. We should have many secondary sources present in order to start an article and in that article we could use hadith as reference. It is wrong to select few hadith and create article. Hence I wish all of those articles should be deleted. However, it is impossible task now. --- ] 08:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == POV pushing? == | |||
| I have come across a lot of Sunnis who are bothered by these facts but none of them was able to provide facts from '''credible''' sources that prove otherwise. Obviously, Fatimah's way of dying, along with the fact that Abu Bakr and Umar were usurpers and cowards makes your whole idiology fall apart. Until you provide facts that show they weren't fucks and didn't kill the Prophet's daughter, only then will you be allowed to revert my '''sourced''' edits. And maybe you shouldn't insert '''your''' POV. This is what happened. Deal with it. <small>]<sup>]</sup></small> 12:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 12:01, 18 June 2007
Muhammad pictures
although you may not be aware that the English Misplaced Pages project Arbitration Committee decided to decline arbitration on the issue of the proposal to remove or replae that particular image. See under 'Depictions of Muhammad - Declined - 1 June 2007' and RealismIncorporated 08:20, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
- You look like a socket-puppet of User:DavidYork71. How can one be so naive to create socket-puppet so many times and make the same kind of mistakes each time. I have not yet file arbitration and I will see there decision when I will file one. --- A. L. M. 08:28, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
User:ALM scientist/Muhammad face Pictures
Hey, I voted to keep that... but, it doesn't really serve a purpose (besides a psuedo vote which won't matter) and the page with your reasoning was kept... so, why don't you show some good faith and delete the 'voting' page in a sign of good will since you reasoning page has already been kept. gren グレン 18:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)
- I deleted it as you have requested. I hope you will help? --- A. L. M. 08:05, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Hadith of the ten promised paradise
Nice edit: There are many more where that came from, see this list. most created and edited by User:Striver, with Sunni views pitted against Shi'a views according to his original research.Proabivouac 01:57, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- I personally think no article should be created based on just Hadith alone. We should have many secondary sources present in order to start an article and in that article we could use hadith as reference. It is wrong to select few hadith and create article. Hence I wish all of those articles should be deleted. However, it is impossible task now. --- A. L. M. 08:54, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
POV pushing?
I have come across a lot of Sunnis who are bothered by these facts but none of them was able to provide facts from credible sources that prove otherwise. Obviously, Fatimah's way of dying, along with the fact that Abu Bakr and Umar were usurpers and cowards makes your whole idiology fall apart. Until you provide facts that show they weren't fucks and didn't kill the Prophet's daughter, only then will you be allowed to revert my sourced edits. And maybe you shouldn't insert your POV. This is what happened. Deal with it. Sonn 12:00, 18 June 2007 (UTC)