| Revision as of 00:28, 19 June 2007 editAtabəy (talk | contribs)Pending changes reviewers7,348 edits →[]← Previous edit | Revision as of 03:16, 19 June 2007 edit undoShalom Yechiel (talk | contribs)26,380 edits →[]: recommend checkuserNext edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| ;Comments | ;Comments | ||
| I recommend that this be taken to checkuser. The evidence is meaningful but far from conclusive, and I don't see how a block would be justified without technical proof. Note that these editors were involved in a recent arbitration case. ]] 03:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC) | |||
| ;Conclusions | ;Conclusions | ||
Revision as of 03:16, 19 June 2007
User:Pam55
- Suspected sockpuppeteers
- Hajji Piruz (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Behmod (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Mardavich (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Suspected sockpuppet
- Pam55 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · page moves · block user · block log)
- Report submission by
Atabek 23:43, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- Evidence
Please, take a look at the entire editing history of User:Pam55. Since the first registration of this account in February and up to now, the user had 10-15 edits and have been doing nothing but making reverts for User:Hajji Piruz/User:Azerbaijani - , and voting for his proposals , and serving as revert mechanism for User:Behmod - , rving admin to , and User:Mardavich - or inserting fact tags.
And block log already shows one 4-day block for being a suspected sockpuppet of User:Behmod.
- Comments
I recommend that this be taken to checkuser. The evidence is meaningful but far from conclusive, and I don't see how a block would be justified without technical proof. Note that these editors were involved in a recent arbitration case. YechielMan 03:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
- Conclusions