Misplaced Pages

talk:Requests for comment/Petri Krohn: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages talk:Requests for comment Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 20:52, 19 June 2007 editAlexia Death (talk | contribs)1,658 edits Otto misplaced his comment.  Revision as of 20:59, 19 June 2007 edit undoBishonen (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators80,333 edits No real dispute resolution has been attempted. Moved from "approved" to "candidate" pages.Next edit →
Line 2: Line 2:


The above request is in my opinion biased and unfounded. The above request is a reaction on the incident reported by Petri Krohn earlier today. Support for Petri by me and other editors can be found at ]. I have first hand experience of edit warring and incivility by requesters Digwuren and Alexia. ] 20:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC) The above request is in my opinion biased and unfounded. The above request is a reaction on the incident reported by Petri Krohn earlier today. Support for Petri by me and other editors can be found at ]. I have first hand experience of edit warring and incivility by requesters Digwuren and Alexia. ] 20:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

=="Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute"==
Posting a on Petri Krohn's talkpage, accusing him of inserting weird fantasies, of being a ], etc etc, emphatically does not equate to attempted dispute resolution—it's more likely to escalate than to resolve the dispute. I must ask the nominators to get some serious attempts at dispute resolution, by at least two people, going before 15:00, 21 June, or the page will be de-listed and deleted. Please see ] for what can be called a serious attempt. Note especially this passage:
<br>"''talking to other parties is not simply a formality to be satisfied before moving on to the next forum. Failure to pursue discussion in good faith shows that you are trying to escalate the dispute instead of resolving it.''"
<br>Digwuren, I would strongly advise you to get a neutral intermediary to mediate the conflict, as the situation between you and PK seems to be too inflamed for you to speak to him, even in the name of "dispute resolution," in a spirit of conciliation and compromise. (The diffs by Suva and Alexia Death, which consist of referring PK to your post, with some added aggressive remarks, are even weaker as "dispute resolution".) You can apply at ], if they will take a case urgently, or ask any experienced, truly neutral, user to help out.
<br>Meanwhile, I have moved the RFC from "approved" to "candidate" pages. It certainly is not approved. ] | ] 20:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC).

Revision as of 20:59, 19 June 2007

User:Otto ter Haar objection moved from page dor misplacement

The above request is in my opinion biased and unfounded. The above request is a reaction on the incident reported by Petri Krohn earlier today. Support for Petri by me and other editors can be found at Misplaced Pages:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Independent_view. I have first hand experience of edit warring and incivility by requesters Digwuren and Alexia. Otto 20:32, 19 June 2007 (UTC)

"Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute"

Posting a flame on Petri Krohn's talkpage, accusing him of inserting weird fantasies, of being a WP:TROLL, etc etc, emphatically does not equate to attempted dispute resolution—it's more likely to escalate than to resolve the dispute. I must ask the nominators to get some serious attempts at dispute resolution, by at least two people, going before 15:00, 21 June, or the page will be de-listed and deleted. Please see Misplaced Pages:Dispute resolution for what can be called a serious attempt. Note especially this passage:
"talking to other parties is not simply a formality to be satisfied before moving on to the next forum. Failure to pursue discussion in good faith shows that you are trying to escalate the dispute instead of resolving it."
Digwuren, I would strongly advise you to get a neutral intermediary to mediate the conflict, as the situation between you and PK seems to be too inflamed for you to speak to him, even in the name of "dispute resolution," in a spirit of conciliation and compromise. (The diffs by Suva and Alexia Death, which consist of referring PK to your post, with some added aggressive remarks, are even weaker as "dispute resolution".) You can apply at WP:MEDCAB, if they will take a case urgently, or ask any experienced, truly neutral, user to help out.
Meanwhile, I have moved the RFC from "approved" to "candidate" pages. It certainly is not approved. Bishonen | talk 20:59, 19 June 2007 (UTC).