Misplaced Pages

User talk:Adam613: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 22:28, 21 February 2007 editAdam613 (talk | contribs)229 edits []← Previous edit Revision as of 12:56, 21 June 2007 edit undo81.242.59.3 (talk) Level 2 VANDALISM and OBSTRUCTION of ARBITRATION WARNINGNext edit →
Line 15: Line 15:
Hi, I have just recieved your message about posting the school article for deletion, firstly thanks for informing me on my discussion page. Secondly I have tidied up the article, added a few internal wiki links and a school introduction table. I have also added two references for now, in line with your argument, and will add some more when I have time to do so in the future. I have therefore challenged the decision to delete and argued for a strong keep, as I believe that the article meets critieria for school articles. ] 22:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC) Hi, I have just recieved your message about posting the school article for deletion, firstly thanks for informing me on my discussion page. Secondly I have tidied up the article, added a few internal wiki links and a school introduction table. I have also added two references for now, in line with your argument, and will add some more when I have time to do so in the future. I have therefore challenged the decision to delete and argued for a strong keep, as I believe that the article meets critieria for school articles. ] 22:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)
: My argument wasn't that references were lacking; my argument was that it didn't appear to me that adding references would satisfy ]. Feel free to prove me wrong. :) You might want to start a thread on the article's talk page if you think others can contribute. ] 22:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC) : My argument wasn't that references were lacking; my argument was that it didn't appear to me that adding references would satisfy ]. Feel free to prove me wrong. :) You might want to start a thread on the article's talk page if you think others can contribute. ] 22:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

== ] ==
{{{icon|]}}} This is a second degree formal warning on a scale of 3 levels.:
:-
{{{icon|]}}} You and/or Your conspirors have vandalised talk pages and even a request for arbitration at
{{{icon|]}}} The contributions history of 17 June 2007 of your conspiror User A._B. alone . This blanking without consent of the opponent party in this dispute has consequence of obstructing normal judicial procedures to come to a settlement in this case. Therefor your actions do not only constitute qualified vandalism as to Wiki:Etiquette, they also constitute qualified obstruction of justice.
{{{icon|]}}} As the vandalism seems to be part of large scale a cover-up operation and/or coordinated efforts of a conspiring gang to erase traces of earlier wrongful activities your vandalism can be considered as qualified participation in a criminal gang.
{{{icon|]}}} Participation in a criminal gang may involve your unlimited solidary responsibility and financial liability (as opposed to proportionate liability) should this conflict result in criminal proceedings in a later stage.
]

Revision as of 12:56, 21 June 2007

WikiProject Wikify Alert: Check out the backlog cleanup taskforce

Welcome

Hello, Adam613, and welcome to Misplaced Pages. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Michaelas10 (Talk) 20:07, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

City of Portsmouth Boys' School

Hi, I have just recieved your message about posting the school article for deletion, firstly thanks for informing me on my discussion page. Secondly I have tidied up the article, added a few internal wiki links and a school introduction table. I have also added two references for now, in line with your argument, and will add some more when I have time to do so in the future. I have therefore challenged the decision to delete and argued for a strong keep, as I believe that the article meets critieria for school articles. LordHarris 22:02, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

My argument wasn't that references were lacking; my argument was that it didn't appear to me that adding references would satisfy notability. Feel free to prove me wrong. :) You might want to start a thread on the article's talk page if you think others can contribute. Adam 22:28, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Level 2 VANDALISM and OBSTRUCTION of ARBITRATION WARNING

This is a second degree formal warning on a scale of 3 levels.:

-

You and/or Your conspirors have vandalised talk pages and even a request for arbitration at the arbitration Request Page

The contributions history of 17 June 2007 of your conspiror User A._B. alone has 34 counts of qualified vandalism of WorkForAll contributions. This blanking without consent of the opponent party in this dispute has consequence of obstructing normal judicial procedures to come to a settlement in this case. Therefor your actions do not only constitute qualified vandalism as to Wiki:Etiquette, they also constitute qualified obstruction of justice.

As the vandalism seems to be part of large scale a cover-up operation and/or coordinated efforts of a conspiring gang to erase traces of earlier wrongful activities your vandalism can be considered as qualified participation in a criminal gang.

Participation in a criminal gang may involve your unlimited solidary responsibility and financial liability (as opposed to proportionate liability) should this conflict result in criminal proceedings in a later stage.

Level 2 VANDALISM and OBSTRUCTION of ARBITRATION WARNING