Revision as of 13:54, 22 June 2007 editMoe Epsilon (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, New page reviewers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers119,291 edits typos← Previous edit | Revision as of 15:04, 22 June 2007 edit undoShadow1 (talk | contribs)5,415 editsm warning about personal attacksNext edit → | ||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
I suggest you look at our Fair Use policy before reinserting Images that do not qualify for Fair Use back into articles. Thank you! — ] ] 13:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC) | I suggest you look at our Fair Use policy before reinserting Images that do not qualify for Fair Use back into articles. Thank you! — ] ] 13:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I suggest you stop. Our Fair Use policy, specially #3a and 8 says that the use of decorative Fair Use images is against policy and the the number of Fair Use images to be minimal. The ] article you references is not a valid example. It has critical text next to the album covers, and qualifies per Fair Use and the fact is, this article does not. Having formatted to appear next to a year and some question marks does not. Try putting some of the album covers in with some relevant text and maybe it will qualify with Fair Use, otherwise it is going to be removed like every other disocgraphy on Misplaced Pages. You're interpretation of vandalism is not accurate either, I am a user in good standing, and your lacking some ]. — ] ] 13:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC) | :I suggest you stop. Our Fair Use policy, specially #3a and 8 says that the use of decorative Fair Use images is against policy and the the number of Fair Use images to be minimal. The ] article you references is not a valid example. It has critical text next to the album covers, and qualifies per Fair Use and the fact is, this article does not. Having formatted to appear next to a year and some question marks does not. Try putting some of the album covers in with some relevant text and maybe it will qualify with Fair Use, otherwise it is going to be removed like every other disocgraphy on Misplaced Pages. You're interpretation of vandalism is not accurate either, I am a user in good standing, and your lacking some ]. — ] ] 13:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Personal attacks == | |||
]. If you continue to harass our editors and edit war over articles, you will be blocked in accordance with Misplaced Pages's ] for disruption. ] ] 15:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 15:04, 22 June 2007
You have new messages (last change).
| ||
|
Old messages will be archived once read, thanks.
Note - Automated bots are not welcome on my talkpage, I consider edits by bots to be spam and will be deleted. Any other form of spamming will be automatically removed from the page too.
The Mission (band)
I suggest you look at our Fair Use policy before reinserting Images that do not qualify for Fair Use back into articles. Thank you! — Moe ε 13:37, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
- I suggest you stop. Our Fair Use policy, specially #3a and 8 says that the use of decorative Fair Use images is against policy and the the number of Fair Use images to be minimal. The Sex Pistols article you references is not a valid example. It has critical text next to the album covers, and qualifies per Fair Use and the fact is, this article does not. Having formatted to appear next to a year and some question marks does not. Try putting some of the album covers in with some relevant text and maybe it will qualify with Fair Use, otherwise it is going to be removed like every other disocgraphy on Misplaced Pages. You're interpretation of vandalism is not accurate either, I am a user in good standing, and your lacking some good faith. — Moe ε 13:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
Personal attacks
Please comment on articles, not other editors. If you continue to harass our editors and edit war over articles, you will be blocked in accordance with Misplaced Pages's blocking policy for disruption. Shadow1 (talk) 15:04, 22 June 2007 (UTC)