Revision as of 04:16, 27 June 2007 view sourceTigeroo (talk | contribs)3,575 edits Restored Tag. Nothing has addressed my concern with this article yet.← Previous edit | Revision as of 04:18, 27 June 2007 view source Tigeroo (talk | contribs)3,575 edits rv self for other changes caught up in the tag restorationNext edit → | ||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
|combatant2=Jews of Khaybar oasis | |combatant2=Jews of Khaybar oasis | ||
|commander1=] | |commander1=] | ||
|commander2=? | |||
|commander2=al-Harith ibn Abu Zaynab†{{Fact|date=May 2007}} | |||
|strength1=1,600 | |strength1=1,600 | ||
|strength2=? | |strength2=? | ||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
The defeated Jews were reduced to serfdom. They surrendered on condition of paying tribute to Muhammad and giving up all their land to Muslims. According to Stillman, this agreement did not cover the ] tribe, which had sought refuge in Khaybar after their expulsion from Medina, and the Muslims beheaded all the men of Banu Nadir, taking the surviving women and children as slaves, and sparing only the lives of the Khaybarian Jews.<ref>Stillman 14, 18</ref> Jews continued to live in the oasis for several more years until they were finally expelled by ] ]. The imposition of tribute upon the conquered Jews served as a precedent for provisions in the ] requiring the exaction of tribute known as '']'' from ] under Muslim rule, and confiscation of land belonging to non-Muslims into the collective property of the ].<ref name="EI" /><ref>Stillman 18–19</ref><ref>Lewis 10</ref> | The defeated Jews were reduced to serfdom. They surrendered on condition of paying tribute to Muhammad and giving up all their land to Muslims. According to Stillman, this agreement did not cover the ] tribe, which had sought refuge in Khaybar after their expulsion from Medina, and the Muslims beheaded all the men of Banu Nadir, taking the surviving women and children as slaves, and sparing only the lives of the Khaybarian Jews.<ref>Stillman 14, 18</ref> Jews continued to live in the oasis for several more years until they were finally expelled by ] ]. The imposition of tribute upon the conquered Jews served as a precedent for provisions in the ] requiring the exaction of tribute known as '']'' from ] under Muslim rule, and confiscation of land belonging to non-Muslims into the collective property of the ].<ref name="EI" /><ref>Stillman 18–19</ref><ref>Lewis 10</ref> | ||
==Khaybar in the 7th century== | ==Background== | ||
===Khaybar in the 7th century=== | |||
In the 7th century, Khaybar was inhabited by the Jews, who pioneered the cultivation of the oasis and made their living growing date palm trees, as well as through commerce and craftsmanship, accumulating considerable wealth. Some objects found by the Muslims in a redoubt at Khaybar — a siege-engine, 20 ]s of ]ite cloth, and 500 cloaks — point out to an intense trade carried out by the Jews. While in the past some scholars attempted to explain the presence of a siege-engine, suggesting that it was used for settling quarrels among the families of the community, nowadays the common opinion among academics is that it was stored in a depôt for future sale, in the same way that swords, lances, shields, and other weaponry had been sold by the Jews to Arabs. Equally, the cloth and the cloaks must have been intended for sale, as it is not conceivable that such a quantity of luxury goods was kept for the exclusive use of the Jews.<ref name="EI"/> | In the 7th century, Khaybar was inhabited by the Jews, who pioneered the cultivation of the oasis and made their living growing date palm trees, as well as through commerce and craftsmanship, accumulating considerable wealth. Some objects found by the Muslims in a redoubt at Khaybar — a siege-engine, 20 ]s of ]ite cloth, and 500 cloaks — point out to an intense trade carried out by the Jews. While in the past some scholars attempted to explain the presence of a siege-engine, suggesting that it was used for settling quarrels among the families of the community, nowadays the common opinion among academics is that it was stored in a depôt for future sale, in the same way that swords, lances, shields, and other weaponry had been sold by the Jews to Arabs. Equally, the cloth and the cloaks must have been intended for sale, as it is not conceivable that such a quantity of luxury goods was kept for the exclusive use of the Jews.<ref name="EI"/> | ||
The oasis was divided into three regions: al-Natat, al-Shikk, and al-Katiba, probably separated by natural diversions, such as the desert, ] drifts, and swamps. Each of these regions contained several fortresses or redoubts containing homes, storehouses and stables. Each fortress was occupied by a separate family and surrounded by cultivated fields and palm-groves. In order to improve their defensive capabilities, the fortresses were raised up on hills or ] rocks.<ref name="EI"/> | The oasis was divided into three regions: al-Natat, al-Shikk, and al-Katiba, probably separated by natural diversions, such as the desert, ] drifts, and swamps. Each of these regions contained several fortresses or redoubts containing homes, storehouses and stables. Each fortress was occupied by a separate family and surrounded by cultivated fields and palm-groves. In order to improve their defensive capabilities, the fortresses were raised up on hills or ] rocks.<ref name="EI"/> | ||
===Muhammad and the Jews of Medina=== | |||
==Pretext to battle== | |||
{{main|Muhammad and the Jews}} | |||
===Banu Nadir=== | |||
⚫ | In 625, after the defeat in the ] at the hands of the ]n army, ] besieged and expelled the Jewish tribe of ] from Medina. Many of the Banu Nadir found refuge in Khaybar. In 627, ], the chief of Banu Nadir, went with his son to join ] and Ghatafan ]s besieging the Muslims at Medina during the ]. After the battle proved unsuccessful, Muhammad and his followers besieged the ], the only major Jewish tribe remaining in Medina at that time. Both Akhtab and his son defended Banu Qurayza. There was actually no fight. Upon surrender, the adult men of Banu Qurayza, as well as Akhtab and his son, were killed and the women and children of the tribe were enslaved.<ref name="EI" /><ref>Stillman 14–16-17</ref> | ||
{{main|Banu Nadir}} | |||
⚫ | In 625, after the defeat in the ] at the hands of the ]n army, ] besieged and expelled the Jewish tribe of ] from Medina. Many of the Banu Nadir found refuge in Khaybar. In 627, ], the chief of Banu Nadir, went with his son to join ] and Ghatafan ]s besieging the Muslims at Medina during the ]. After the battle proved unsuccessful, Muhammad and his followers besieged the ], the only major Jewish tribe remaining in Medina at that time. Both Akhtab and his son defended Banu Qurayza. Upon surrender, the adult men of Banu Qurayza, as well as Akhtab and his son, were killed and the women and children of the tribe were enslaved.<ref name="EI" /><ref>Stillman 14–16-17</ref> | ||
⚫ | ===Political situation=== | ||
After the death of ibn Akhtab, ] took charge of the Banu Nadir at ]. Al-Huqayq soon approached neighbouring tribes to raise an army against Muhammad.<ref>Nomani (1979), vol. II, pg. 156</ref><ref>Urwa, ''Fath al-Bari'', Vol. VII, pg. 363</ref> After learning this, the Muslims, aided by an Arab with a Jewish dialect, assasinated him.<ref name="st17">Stillman 17</ref> | |||
⚫ | Modern historians agree that one reason for Muhammad's decision to attack Khaybar was the need to raise his prestige among his followers, which had been eroded by the ].<ref name="EI" /><ref name="st18">Stillman 18</ref><ref>Watt 188–189</ref><ref>Lewis ''Arabs in History'' 43</ref> In addition, the Hudaybiyya agreement gave Muhammad the assurance of not being attacked by the Meccans during the expedition.<ref name="EI" /> Watt sees the presence of the Banu Nadir in Khaybar as the primary motive for the attack. According to Watt, the Banu Nadir had paid Arab tribes to go to war against Muhammad, leaving him little choice but to attack Khaybar.<ref>Watt 189</ref><ref name="EI"/> Vaglieri concurs that the Jews were likely responsible for the coalition that besieged the Muslims in the ], but suggests that Muhammad's attacks against the Jews, first in Medina and then in Khaybar, had economic roots similar to those which have brought about persecutions and ]s in other countries in the course of history. The conquest of Khaybar, Vaglieri argues, would enable him to satisfy with ample booty his companions who hoped to capture Mecca and were discontented at the treaty with the Quraysh.<ref name="EI" /> Stillman adds that Muhammad needed the victory to show the Bedouins, who were not strongly tied to the rest of the Muslim community, that the alliance with him would pay off.<ref name="st18"/> | ||
In his preparations for the attack, Muhammad took steps to eliminate some of the leaders of the Jews of Khaybar. His companions stole into Khaybar at night and assassinated ], one of the Khaybar chieftains. Seeing the willingness of the Jews to negotiate with him, Muhammad sent envoys to Khaybar inviting ], the war chief of Banu Nadir, to come to Medina for talks. Unarmed, Umayr and thirty his companions set off to Medina with Muhammad's emissaries. On the way, the Muslims attacked the Jewish delegation, killing all but one of them, who managed to escape.<ref name="st17">Stillman 17</ref> | |||
⚫ | As war with Muhammad seemed imminent, the Jews of Khaybar entered into an alliance with the Jews of ] oasis, as well as with Bedouins of Ghatafan tribe. However, the lack of central authority at Khaybar prevented any further defensive preparations, and quarrels between different families left the Jews disorganized.<ref name="EI" /> | ||
===Reasons for attack=== | |||
⚫ | Modern historians agree that one reason for Muhammad's decision to attack Khaybar was the need to raise his prestige among his followers, which had been eroded by the ], in March ].<ref name="EI" /><ref name="st18">Stillman 18</ref><ref>Watt 188–189</ref><ref>Lewis ''Arabs in History'' 43</ref> In addition, the Hudaybiyya agreement gave Muhammad the assurance of not being attacked by the Meccans during the expedition.<ref name="EI" /> Watt sees the |
||
⚫ | ===Political situation=== | ||
⚫ | As war with Muhammad seemed imminent, the Jews of Khaybar entered into an alliance with the Jews of ] oasis |
||
==Course of battle== | ==Course of battle== | ||
Muhammad and his followers marched on Khaybar in May 629, ]. According to different sources, the strength of his army varied from 1,400 to 1,800 men and between 100 and 200 horses. Thanks to the speed and secrecy of the march, the Muslims caught the Jews by surprise; the Jews realized they were under attack only when they went out to work in the fields. As a result, the Jews failed to mount a centrally organized defense, leaving each family to defend its own fortified redoubt. In addition, Muhammad bribed the Bedouin allies of the Jews and prevented any further assistance from coming to Khaybar.<ref name="st18" /><ref name="EI" /> | |||
Knowing the fate of Banu Qurayza, the Jews of Khaybar put up fierce resistance, and Muslims were forced to take fortresses one by one.<ref name="st18" /> The Jews, after a rather bloody skirmish in front of one of the fortresses, avoided combat in the open country, and Muhammad had to resort to besieging and storming the fortresses, hoping that the capitulation of the defenders should become inevitable through lack of water and food. However, the besieged Jews managed to organize, under the cover of darkness, a transfer of people and treasures from one fortress to another as needed to make their resistance more effective.<ref name="EI" /> | |||
Before the battle, the people of Khaybar no doubt knew of the war. However, the Muslims' swift march to Khaybar, caught the Jews by surprise. As a result, the Jews failed to mount a centrally organized defense, leaving each family to defend its own fortified redoubt. <ref name="st18" /><ref name="EI" /> | |||
⚫ | The traditional Muslim biographies of Muhammad report that in one of the fortresses, first ], then ], took up the standard in the hope of breaking down their resistance, by putting themselves at the head of the attacks, but both failed. According to this tradition, Muhammad then called to his standard-bearer ], who killed a Jewish chieftain with a sword-stroke, which split in two the helmet, the head and the body of the victim. Having lost his shield, Ali is said to have lifted both of the doors of the fortress from its hinges, climbed into the moat and held them up to make a bridge whereby the attackers gained access to the redoubt. The door was so heavy that forty men were required to put it back in place. This story is one basis for the Muslim view, especially in ], of Ali as the prototype of heroes.<ref>Jafri_</ref><ref name="EI" /> | ||
Knowing the outcome of Muhammad's battles with other Jewish tribes, the Jews of Khaybar put up fierce resistance, and Muslims were forced to take fortresses one by one. During the battle, the Muslims were able to prevent Khaybar's Ghatafan allies (consisting of 4,000 men) from providing them with reinforcements. One reason given is that the Muslims were able to buy off the the bedouins allies of the Jews. Watt, however, also suggests that rumors of a Muslim attack on Ghatafan strongholds might also have played a role.<ref name="st18" /><ref>Watt (1956), pg. 93</ref> | |||
⚫ | Neither the Jews nor the Muslims were prepared for an extended siege, and both suffered from a lack of provisions. The Jews, initially over confident in their strength, failed to prepare their water supplies even for a short seige.<ref>Watt (1956), pg. 219</ref>On one occasion, Muslim soldier killed and cooked a score of donkeys, which escaped from a farm. The incident led Muhammad to forbid to Muslims the meat of horses, mules, and donkeys, unless consumption was forced by necessity. Muhammad ordered the felling of 400 palms around one fortress to force its defenders to capitulate. Finally, the Jews surrendered when after a month and a half of the siege, all but two fortresses were captured by the Muslims.<ref name="EI" /> | ||
The Jews, after a rather bloody skirmish in front of one of the fortresses, avoided combat in the open country. Most of the fighting consisted of shooting arrows at a great distance. On atleast one occasion | |||
the Muslims were able to storm the fortresses. There were also some single combats,<ref>Watt (1956), pg. 218</ref> the most notorious one bieng between ] and Marhab, a famed Arab warrior.<ref>Nomani, vol. II, pg. 165-6</ref> | |||
⚫ | ] (Arabic: '']'') that most, but not all ]s regard as ] claim that Nikah Mut'ah was forbiden by Muhammad at this moment. ] view that narration as fabricated.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} | ||
The besieged Jews managed to organize, under the cover of darkness, a transfer of people and treasures from one fortress to another as needed to make their resistance more effective.<ref name="EI" /> | |||
Neither the Jews nor the Muslims were prepared for an extended siege, and both suffered from a lack of provisions. The Jews, initially overconfident in their strength, failed to prepare thier water supplies even for a short siege.<ref>Watt (1956), pg. 219</ref> | |||
After the forts at an-Natat and those at ash-Shiqq were captured, there was little resistance. The Jews speedily met with Muhammad to discuss the terms of surrender.<ref>Watt (1956), pg. 218</ref> The people of al-Waṭī and al-Sulālim surrendered to the Muslims on the condition that they be "treated leniently" and the Muslims refrain from shedding their blood. Muhammad agreed to these conditions and did not take any of the property of these two forts.<ref name = "Hisham" /> | |||
==Aftermath== | ==Aftermath== | ||
The Jews were able to negotiate an agreement under which they were to remain in the oasis, cultivating their land. Muhammad also ordered the restitution to the Jews of their holy scriptures.<ref name="EI"/> However, from now on they were required to hand over one-half of the produce to the Muslims. The pact didn't define the situation of the Jews, nor specify whether the Jews were to remain owners of the land.<ref name="EI"/> Modern historians suggest that the lack of precision was an ex-post justification for the subsequent expulsion of Jews from Khaybar. The agreement with the Jews of Khaybar served as an important precedent for Islamic Law in determining the status of ]s, i.e. non-Muslims who fell under Muslim rule.<ref name="EI" /><ref>Stillman 18–19</ref><ref>Lewis 10</ref> | |||
] met with Ibn Abi Al-Huqaiq, al-Katibah and al-Watih <ref>Watt 1956), pg. 218</ref> to discuss the terms of surrender. As part of the agreement, the Jews of Khaybar were to evacuate the area, and surrender their wealth. The Muslims, would cease warfare, and not hurt any of the Jews. The After, the agreement some Jews approached Muhammad, with a request to continue to cultivate their fine orchards, and remain in the oasis. In return, they would give one-half of their produce to the Muslims. Muhammad accepted the proposal.<ref>Watt 1956), pg. 218</ref> He also ordered the restitution to the Jews of their holy scriptures.<ref name="EI"/> | |||
⚫ | Among the Jewish women there was one who was chosen by Muhammad as wife. It was ], daughter of the killed Banu Nadir chief Huyayy ibn Akhtab and widow of ], the treasurer of Banu Nadir. According to Ibn Ishaq, when Muhammad asked him to locate the tribe's treasure, al-Rabi denied knowing where it was. A Jew told Muhammad that he had seen Al-Rabi near a certain ruin every morning. When the ruin was excavated, it was found to contain some of the treasure. Muhammad ordered ] to torture al-Rabi until he revealed the location of the rest, then handed him to ], whose brother had died in the battle, to be beheaded.<ref>]. ''Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya'' (''The Life of The Prophet''). English translation in Guillame (1955), pp. 145–146</ref><ref>].''Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya'' (''The Life of The Prophet''). English translation in Stillman (1979), pp. 145–146</ref> | ||
According to Ibn Hisham's version of the pact with Khaybar, it was concluded on the conditon that the Muslims "may expel you if and when we wish to expel you." Norman Stillman believes that this is probably a later interpolation intended to justify the expulsion of Jews in 642.<ref name = "Hisham" /> The agreement with the Jews of Khaybar served as an important precedent for Islamic Law in determining the status of ]s, (non-Muslims under Muslim rule).<ref name="EI" /><ref>Stillman 18–19</ref><ref>Lewis 10</ref> | |||
⚫ | Muslim biographers of Muhammad tell a story that a Jewish woman of Banu Nadir tribe attempted to poison Muhammad to avenge her slain relatives. She poisoned a piece of lamb that she cooked for Muhammad and his companion, putting especially much poison into the shoulder — Muhammad's favorite part of lamb. The attempt on Muhammad's life failed because he reportedly spit out the meat, feeling that it was poisoned, while his companion ate the meat and died. Muhammad's companions reported that, on his deathbed, Muhammad said that his illness was the result of that poisoning.<ref>Ibn Hisham. ''Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya'' (''The Life of The Prophet''). English translation in Stillman (1979), pp. 148–149</ref> | ||
After hearing about this battle, the people of ], allied with Khaybar during the battle, sent Muḥayyisa b. Masūd to Muhammad. Fadak offered to be "treated leniently" in return for surrender. A treaty similar to that of Khaybar was drawn with Fadak as well.<ref name = "Hisham" /> | |||
⚫ | Among the Jewish women there was one who was chosen by Muhammad as wife. It was ], daughter of the killed Banu Nadir chief Huyayy ibn Akhtab and widow of ], the treasurer of Banu Nadir. According to Ibn Ishaq, when Muhammad asked him to locate the tribe's treasure, al-Rabi denied knowing where it was. A Jew told Muhammad that he had seen Al-Rabi near a certain ruin every morning. When the ruin was excavated, it was found to contain some of the treasure. Muhammad ordered ] to torture al-Rabi until he revealed the location of the rest, then handed him to ], whose brother had died in the battle, to be beheaded.<ref |
||
⚫ | Muslim biographers of Muhammad tell a story that a Jewish woman of Banu Nadir tribe attempted to poison Muhammad to avenge her slain relatives. She poisoned a piece of lamb that she cooked for Muhammad and his companion, putting especially much poison into the shoulder — Muhammad's favorite part of lamb. The attempt on Muhammad's life failed because he reportedly spit out the meat, feeling that it was poisoned, while his companion ate the meat and died. Muhammad's companions reported that, on his deathbed, Muhammad said that his illness was the result of that poisoning.<ref>Ibn Hisham. ''Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya'' (''The Life of The Prophet''). English translation in Stillman (1979), pp. |
||
The victory in Khaybar greatly raised the status of Muhammad among his followers and, local Bedouin tribes, who, seeing his power, swore allegiance to Muhammad and converted to ]. The captured booty and weapons strengthened his army, and he captured Mecca just 18 months after Khaybar.<ref name="EI" /><ref name="st18" /> | The victory in Khaybar greatly raised the status of Muhammad among his followers and, local Bedouin tribes, who, seeing his power, swore allegiance to Muhammad and converted to ]. The captured booty and weapons strengthened his army, and he captured Mecca just 18 months after Khaybar.<ref name="EI" /><ref name="st18" /> | ||
==The battle in classic Islamic literature== | |||
⚫ | The traditional Muslim biographies of Muhammad report that in one of the fortresses, first ], then ], took up the standard in the hope of breaking down their resistance, by putting themselves at the head of the attacks, but both failed. According to this tradition, Muhammad then called to his standard-bearer ], who killed a Jewish chieftain with a sword-stroke, which split in two the helmet, the head and the body of the victim. Having lost his shield, Ali is said to have lifted both of the doors of the fortress from its hinges, climbed into the moat and held them up to make a bridge whereby the attackers gained access to the redoubt. The door was so heavy that forty men were required to put it back in place. This story is one basis for the Muslim view, especially in ], of Ali as the prototype of heroes.<ref>Jafri_</ref><ref name="EI" /> | ||
⚫ | ] (Arabic: '']'') that most, but not all ]s regard as ] claim that Nikah Mut'ah was forbiden by Muhammad at this moment. ] view that narration as fabricated.{{Fact|date=February 2007}} | ||
⚫ | On one occasion, Muslim soldier killed and cooked a score of donkeys, which escaped from a farm. The incident led Muhammad to forbid to Muslims the meat of horses, mules, and donkeys, unless consumption was forced by necessity. Muhammad ordered the felling of 400 palms around one fortress to force its defenders to capitulate. Finally, the Jews surrendered when after a month and a half of the siege, all but two fortresses were captured by the Muslims.<ref name="EI" /> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||
Line 96: | Line 77: | ||
*]. ''The Jews of Islam''. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 0-691-00807-8 | *]. ''The Jews of Islam''. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 0-691-00807-8 | ||
*Lewis, Bernard. ''The Arabs in History''. Oxford University Press, 1993 ed. (reissued 2002). ISBN 0-19-280310-7 | *Lewis, Bernard. ''The Arabs in History''. Oxford University Press, 1993 ed. (reissued 2002). ISBN 0-19-280310-7 | ||
*{{cite book | last = ] | first = Shibli | title = Sirat al-Nabi| publisher = Pakistan Historical Society | date = 1970 | location = ] }} | |||
*]. ''The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book''. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1979. ISBN 0-8276-0198-0 | *]. ''The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book''. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1979. ISBN 0-8276-0198-0 | ||
*] (1956). ''Muhammad at Medina''. Oxford University Press. | *] (1956). ''Muhammad at Medina''. Oxford University Press. | ||
*] |
*]. ''Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman''. Oxford University Press, 1964 | ||
* Hekmat, Anwar, ''Women and the Koran The Status of Women in Islam'', (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997), ISBN 1-57392-162-9 | * Hekmat, Anwar, ''Women and the Koran The Status of Women in Islam'', (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997), ISBN 1-57392-162-9 | ||
] | ] | ||
] | ] |
Revision as of 04:18, 27 June 2007
The examples and perspective in this article may not represent a worldwide view of the subject. You may improve this article, discuss the issue on the talk page, or create a new article, as appropriate. (Learn how and when to remove this message) |
Battle of Khaybar | |||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Part of Campaigns of Muhammad | |||||||
File:Khaybar.gif Ruins of a Jewish fortress in Khaybar | |||||||
| |||||||
Belligerents | |||||||
Muslim army | Jews of Khaybar oasis | ||||||
Commanders and leaders | |||||||
Muhammad | ? | ||||||
Strength | |||||||
1,600 | ? | ||||||
Casualties and losses | |||||||
16 | ? |
Campaigns of Muhammad | |
---|---|
Further information: Military career of Muhammad |
The Battle of Khaybar was fought in the year 629 between Muhammad and his followers against the Jews living in the oasis of Khaybar, located 150 kilometers (95 miles) from Medina in the north-western part of the Arabian peninsula, in modern-day Saudi Arabia. Contemporary scholars such as Norman Stillman and Laura Veccia Vaglieri believe that one reason for Muhammad's decision to attack Khaybar in order to raise his prestige among his followers, as well as to capture booty to sustain subsequent conquests. Furthermore, William Montgomery Watt notes the presence of the Banu Nadir in Khaybar, who were inciting hostilities along with neighboring Arab tribes against Muhammad.Cite error: A <ref>
tag is missing the closing </ref>
(see the help page).
The defeated Jews were reduced to serfdom. They surrendered on condition of paying tribute to Muhammad and giving up all their land to Muslims. According to Stillman, this agreement did not cover the Banu Nadir tribe, which had sought refuge in Khaybar after their expulsion from Medina, and the Muslims beheaded all the men of Banu Nadir, taking the surviving women and children as slaves, and sparing only the lives of the Khaybarian Jews. Jews continued to live in the oasis for several more years until they were finally expelled by caliph Umar. The imposition of tribute upon the conquered Jews served as a precedent for provisions in the Islamic law requiring the exaction of tribute known as jizya from non-Muslims under Muslim rule, and confiscation of land belonging to non-Muslims into the collective property of the Muslim community.
Background
Khaybar in the 7th century
In the 7th century, Khaybar was inhabited by the Jews, who pioneered the cultivation of the oasis and made their living growing date palm trees, as well as through commerce and craftsmanship, accumulating considerable wealth. Some objects found by the Muslims in a redoubt at Khaybar — a siege-engine, 20 bales of Yemenite cloth, and 500 cloaks — point out to an intense trade carried out by the Jews. While in the past some scholars attempted to explain the presence of a siege-engine, suggesting that it was used for settling quarrels among the families of the community, nowadays the common opinion among academics is that it was stored in a depôt for future sale, in the same way that swords, lances, shields, and other weaponry had been sold by the Jews to Arabs. Equally, the cloth and the cloaks must have been intended for sale, as it is not conceivable that such a quantity of luxury goods was kept for the exclusive use of the Jews.
The oasis was divided into three regions: al-Natat, al-Shikk, and al-Katiba, probably separated by natural diversions, such as the desert, lava drifts, and swamps. Each of these regions contained several fortresses or redoubts containing homes, storehouses and stables. Each fortress was occupied by a separate family and surrounded by cultivated fields and palm-groves. In order to improve their defensive capabilities, the fortresses were raised up on hills or basalt rocks.
Muhammad and the Jews of Medina
Main article: Muhammad and the JewsIn 625, after the defeat in the Battle of Uhud at the hands of the Meccan army, Muhammad besieged and expelled the Jewish tribe of Banu Nadir from Medina. Many of the Banu Nadir found refuge in Khaybar. In 627, Huyayy ibn Akhtab, the chief of Banu Nadir, went with his son to join Quraysh and Ghatafan Bedouins besieging the Muslims at Medina during the Battle of the Trench. After the battle proved unsuccessful, Muhammad and his followers besieged the Banu Qurayza, the only major Jewish tribe remaining in Medina at that time. Both Akhtab and his son defended Banu Qurayza. There was actually no fight. Upon surrender, the adult men of Banu Qurayza, as well as Akhtab and his son, were killed and the women and children of the tribe were enslaved.
Political situation
Modern historians agree that one reason for Muhammad's decision to attack Khaybar was the need to raise his prestige among his followers, which had been eroded by the Treaty of Hudaybiyya. In addition, the Hudaybiyya agreement gave Muhammad the assurance of not being attacked by the Meccans during the expedition. Watt sees the presence of the Banu Nadir in Khaybar as the primary motive for the attack. According to Watt, the Banu Nadir had paid Arab tribes to go to war against Muhammad, leaving him little choice but to attack Khaybar. Vaglieri concurs that the Jews were likely responsible for the coalition that besieged the Muslims in the Battle of the Trench, but suggests that Muhammad's attacks against the Jews, first in Medina and then in Khaybar, had economic roots similar to those which have brought about persecutions and pogroms in other countries in the course of history. The conquest of Khaybar, Vaglieri argues, would enable him to satisfy with ample booty his companions who hoped to capture Mecca and were discontented at the treaty with the Quraysh. Stillman adds that Muhammad needed the victory to show the Bedouins, who were not strongly tied to the rest of the Muslim community, that the alliance with him would pay off.
In his preparations for the attack, Muhammad took steps to eliminate some of the leaders of the Jews of Khaybar. His companions stole into Khaybar at night and assassinated Abu al-Rafi ibn Abi al-Huqayq, one of the Khaybar chieftains. Seeing the willingness of the Jews to negotiate with him, Muhammad sent envoys to Khaybar inviting Usayr ibn Zarim, the war chief of Banu Nadir, to come to Medina for talks. Unarmed, Umayr and thirty his companions set off to Medina with Muhammad's emissaries. On the way, the Muslims attacked the Jewish delegation, killing all but one of them, who managed to escape.
As war with Muhammad seemed imminent, the Jews of Khaybar entered into an alliance with the Jews of Fadak oasis, as well as with Bedouins of Ghatafan tribe. However, the lack of central authority at Khaybar prevented any further defensive preparations, and quarrels between different families left the Jews disorganized.
Course of battle
Muhammad and his followers marched on Khaybar in May 629, 7 AH. According to different sources, the strength of his army varied from 1,400 to 1,800 men and between 100 and 200 horses. Thanks to the speed and secrecy of the march, the Muslims caught the Jews by surprise; the Jews realized they were under attack only when they went out to work in the fields. As a result, the Jews failed to mount a centrally organized defense, leaving each family to defend its own fortified redoubt. In addition, Muhammad bribed the Bedouin allies of the Jews and prevented any further assistance from coming to Khaybar.
Knowing the fate of Banu Qurayza, the Jews of Khaybar put up fierce resistance, and Muslims were forced to take fortresses one by one. The Jews, after a rather bloody skirmish in front of one of the fortresses, avoided combat in the open country, and Muhammad had to resort to besieging and storming the fortresses, hoping that the capitulation of the defenders should become inevitable through lack of water and food. However, the besieged Jews managed to organize, under the cover of darkness, a transfer of people and treasures from one fortress to another as needed to make their resistance more effective.
The traditional Muslim biographies of Muhammad report that in one of the fortresses, first Abu Bakr, then Umar, took up the standard in the hope of breaking down their resistance, by putting themselves at the head of the attacks, but both failed. According to this tradition, Muhammad then called to his standard-bearer Ali, who killed a Jewish chieftain with a sword-stroke, which split in two the helmet, the head and the body of the victim. Having lost his shield, Ali is said to have lifted both of the doors of the fortress from its hinges, climbed into the moat and held them up to make a bridge whereby the attackers gained access to the redoubt. The door was so heavy that forty men were required to put it back in place. This story is one basis for the Muslim view, especially in Shi'a Islam, of Ali as the prototype of heroes.
Neither the Jews nor the Muslims were prepared for an extended siege, and both suffered from a lack of provisions. The Jews, initially over confident in their strength, failed to prepare their water supplies even for a short seige.On one occasion, Muslim soldier killed and cooked a score of donkeys, which escaped from a farm. The incident led Muhammad to forbid to Muslims the meat of horses, mules, and donkeys, unless consumption was forced by necessity. Muhammad ordered the felling of 400 palms around one fortress to force its defenders to capitulate. Finally, the Jews surrendered when after a month and a half of the siege, all but two fortresses were captured by the Muslims.
One single narration regarding temporary marriage (Arabic: Nikah Mut'ah) that most, but not all Sunnis regard as authentic claim that Nikah Mut'ah was forbiden by Muhammad at this moment. Shi'a view that narration as fabricated.
Aftermath
The Jews were able to negotiate an agreement under which they were to remain in the oasis, cultivating their land. Muhammad also ordered the restitution to the Jews of their holy scriptures. However, from now on they were required to hand over one-half of the produce to the Muslims. The pact didn't define the situation of the Jews, nor specify whether the Jews were to remain owners of the land. Modern historians suggest that the lack of precision was an ex-post justification for the subsequent expulsion of Jews from Khaybar. The agreement with the Jews of Khaybar served as an important precedent for Islamic Law in determining the status of dhimmis, i.e. non-Muslims who fell under Muslim rule.
Among the Jewish women there was one who was chosen by Muhammad as wife. It was Safiyya bint Huyayy, daughter of the killed Banu Nadir chief Huyayy ibn Akhtab and widow of Kinana ibn al-Rabi, the treasurer of Banu Nadir. According to Ibn Ishaq, when Muhammad asked him to locate the tribe's treasure, al-Rabi denied knowing where it was. A Jew told Muhammad that he had seen Al-Rabi near a certain ruin every morning. When the ruin was excavated, it was found to contain some of the treasure. Muhammad ordered Al-Zubayr to torture al-Rabi until he revealed the location of the rest, then handed him to Muhammad ibn Maslamah, whose brother had died in the battle, to be beheaded.
Muslim biographers of Muhammad tell a story that a Jewish woman of Banu Nadir tribe attempted to poison Muhammad to avenge her slain relatives. She poisoned a piece of lamb that she cooked for Muhammad and his companion, putting especially much poison into the shoulder — Muhammad's favorite part of lamb. The attempt on Muhammad's life failed because he reportedly spit out the meat, feeling that it was poisoned, while his companion ate the meat and died. Muhammad's companions reported that, on his deathbed, Muhammad said that his illness was the result of that poisoning.
The victory in Khaybar greatly raised the status of Muhammad among his followers and, local Bedouin tribes, who, seeing his power, swore allegiance to Muhammad and converted to Islam. The captured booty and weapons strengthened his army, and he captured Mecca just 18 months after Khaybar.
See also
Notes
- ^ Veccia Vaglieri, L. "Khaybar", Encyclopaedia of Islam
- Stillman 18
- Stillman 14, 18
- Stillman 18–19
- Lewis 10
- Stillman 14–16-17
- ^ Stillman 18
- Watt 188–189
- Lewis Arabs in History 43
- Watt 189
- Stillman 17
- Jafri_
- Watt (1956), pg. 219
- Stillman 18–19
- Lewis 10
- Ibn Hisham. Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya (The Life of The Prophet). English translation in Guillame (1955), pp. 145–146
- Ibn Hisham.Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya (The Life of The Prophet). English translation in Stillman (1979), pp. 145–146
- Ibn Hisham. Al-Sira al-Nabawiyya (The Life of The Prophet). English translation in Stillman (1979), pp. 148–149
References
- Encyclopaedia of Islam. Ed. P. Bearman et al., Leiden: Brill, 1960-2005.
- Guillaume, Alfred. The Life of Muhammad: A Translation of Ibn Ishaq's Sirat Rasul Allah. Oxford University Press, 1955. ISBN 0-1963-6033-1
- Jafri, S.H.M. The Origins and Early Development of Shi'a Islam. Longman;1979 ISBN 0-582-78080-2
- Lewis, Bernard. The Jews of Islam. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1984. ISBN 0-691-00807-8
- Lewis, Bernard. The Arabs in History. Oxford University Press, 1993 ed. (reissued 2002). ISBN 0-19-280310-7
- Stillman, Norman. The Jews of Arab Lands: A History and Source Book. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society of America, 1979. ISBN 0-8276-0198-0
- Montgomery Watt, W. (1956). Muhammad at Medina. Oxford University Press.
- Montgomery Watt, W.. Muhammad: Prophet and Statesman. Oxford University Press, 1964
- Hekmat, Anwar, Women and the Koran The Status of Women in Islam, (Amherst, NY: Prometheus Books, 1997), ISBN 1-57392-162-9