| Revision as of 23:35, 3 July 2007 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →July, 2007: Whatever.← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:37, 3 July 2007 edit undoOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits →July, 2007: That is what we call comeuppance.Next edit → | ||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
| :Don't get your panties in a wad, I was just following ]. –] 23:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | :Don't get your panties in a wad, I was just following ]. –] 23:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::Panties in a wad? What childish language is that??? You're just trying to hide good discussion about a lot of POV issues. Now it will all be repeated over and over and over again. Editors will come in and fight battles that were resolved, eliminate consensus that was constructed over time, and whatever else that happens in these type of articles. Have you ever thought about discussing it? Didn't think so. Just took it upon yourself to mess it up. Great. It was vandalism. ] 23:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | ::Panties in a wad? What childish language is that??? You're just trying to hide good discussion about a lot of POV issues. Now it will all be repeated over and over and over again. Editors will come in and fight battles that were resolved, eliminate consensus that was constructed over time, and whatever else that happens in these type of articles. Have you ever thought about discussing it? Didn't think so. Just took it upon yourself to mess it up. Great. It was vandalism. ] 23:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :::Oh, by the way Mr. Panty obsessed--someone reverted your vandalism. Oh well. ] 23:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 23:37, 3 July 2007
==This was great, "audacious fuckwit". •Jim62sch• 21:22, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
July, 2007
Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Misplaced Pages, as you did to Talk:Creation science, you will be blocked from editing. Orangemarlin 22:53, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Don't get your panties in a wad, I was just following WP:ARCHIVE. –Fatalis 23:04, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Panties in a wad? What childish language is that??? You're just trying to hide good discussion about a lot of POV issues. Now it will all be repeated over and over and over again. Editors will come in and fight battles that were resolved, eliminate consensus that was constructed over time, and whatever else that happens in these type of articles. Have you ever thought about discussing it? Didn't think so. Just took it upon yourself to mess it up. Great. It was vandalism. Orangemarlin 23:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Oh, by the way Mr. Panty obsessed--someone reverted your vandalism. Oh well. Orangemarlin 23:37, 3 July 2007 (UTC)
- Panties in a wad? What childish language is that??? You're just trying to hide good discussion about a lot of POV issues. Now it will all be repeated over and over and over again. Editors will come in and fight battles that were resolved, eliminate consensus that was constructed over time, and whatever else that happens in these type of articles. Have you ever thought about discussing it? Didn't think so. Just took it upon yourself to mess it up. Great. It was vandalism. Orangemarlin 23:35, 3 July 2007 (UTC)