| Revision as of 04:59, 1 July 2007 editJagra (talk | contribs)1,708 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:54, 7 July 2007 edit undoKsvaughan2 (talk | contribs)1,106 edits →Herpes zoster - comments from an uninvolved admin.Next edit → | ||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
| : Please don't just show up at an article and revert back to a previous version as you did at H. zoster. Especially do no not do so when there is was a prior consensus not to have your edits and there was concern about NPOV and RS. Such behavior is time consuming and disruptive. ] 02:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | : Please don't just show up at an article and revert back to a previous version as you did at H. zoster. Especially do no not do so when there is was a prior consensus not to have your edits and there was concern about NPOV and RS. Such behavior is time consuming and disruptive. ] 02:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| ::The question of RS, V and NPov has been dealt with in an agreed Break so that Discussion might ensure, The accussations were not substantiated, quite the reverse in fact, check for yourself. Other than that I am not aware of the consensus you mention? The other recent allegations I have directed to your talk for redress as a concerning pattern seems to be emerging!] | ::The question of RS, V and NPov has been dealt with in an agreed Break so that Discussion might ensure, The accussations were not substantiated, quite the reverse in fact, check for yourself. Other than that I am not aware of the consensus you mention? The other recent allegations I have directed to your talk for redress as a concerning pattern seems to be emerging!] | ||
| Hi Jagra, | |||
| I decided to wait the fish out while I compiled more references. And I might well complain of vandalism if he continues to revert them. I find the ignorance and vehemence of his charges pretty appalling- he doesn't understand the information so it is invalid. What are these consensuses that people here are citing? ] 16:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:54, 7 July 2007
References
To do what you want to do see WP:CITE. If you need specific help, or if you would like me to do it for you, feel free to contact me on my talk page. --Random 03:50, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry. I misunderstood what you meant. To make a references list in the bottom of an article add the following {{reflist}} to a reference section. The wikipedian who originally answered that question already did it for you. --Random 14:11, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
I saw your question on the help desk. Here's the quote from Misplaced Pages's guidelines: 11 This wikipedia guideline on editing style states
English-language sources should be given whenever possible, and should always be used in preference to other language sources of equal calibre. However, do give references in other languages where appropriate. If quoting from a different language source, an English translation should be given with the original-language quote beside it. VK35 17:38, 8 June 2007 (UTC)
In response to your message, I was merely citing the wikipedia policy. If you carefully consider what you are doing and genuinely believe that you are doing the best and generally accepted action, then you are probably ok. VK35 16:00, 29 June 2007 (UTC)
Herpes zoster - comments from an uninvolved admin.
First, I strongly suggest you see WP:NPOV's undue weight clause and take a look also at WP:RS and WP:V. Second, slow revert wars are unacceptable. JoshuaZ 14:36, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
- I fully agree, have read your points and learnt, check the pot not just the kettle, as I have not reverted any edit at this time, slow war accussations are out of order.Jagra 05:12, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
- Please don't just show up at an article and revert back to a previous version as you did at H. zoster. Especially do no not do so when there is was a prior consensus not to have your edits and there was concern about NPOV and RS. Such behavior is time consuming and disruptive. JoshuaZ 02:08, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
- The question of RS, V and NPov has been dealt with in an agreed Break so that Discussion might ensure, The accussations were not substantiated, quite the reverse in fact, check for yourself. Other than that I am not aware of the consensus you mention? The other recent allegations I have directed to your talk for redress as a concerning pattern seems to be emerging!Jagra
Hi Jagra,
I decided to wait the fish out while I compiled more references. And I might well complain of vandalism if he continues to revert them. I find the ignorance and vehemence of his charges pretty appalling- he doesn't understand the information so it is invalid. What are these consensuses that people here are citing? KSVaughan2 16:54, 7 July 2007 (UTC)