| Revision as of 19:32, 7 July 2007 edit198.53.160.186 (talk)No edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:34, 7 July 2007 edit undoCrum375 (talk | contribs)Administrators23,961 editsm Reverted edits by 198.53.160.186 (talk) to last version by Jamdav86Next edit → | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
| Now his ban is over, he is again going against established consensus, and will probably break the 3RR again wihtout blinking. Any suggestions for further action? --] 17:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | Now his ban is over, he is again going against established consensus, and will probably break the 3RR again wihtout blinking. Any suggestions for further action? --] 17:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| By "outing" editors I referred, obvioulsy, to the probability that "editors" who have amended the Rachel Marsden entry are either working on behalf of, or in fact ARE Ms. Marsden herself. | |||
| The fact you may feel threatened does not constitute a threat; what would constitute a threat is YOUR remarks regarding what will or will not cause me "problems". | |||
| You of course blatantly refuse to reply to my assertions of a ludicrous PR protective bias for Ms. Marsden. And yes, Rachel, you WILL be revealed as one who writes and rewrites her own Misplaced Pages entry, from however many IP addresses you can access. | |||
Revision as of 19:34, 7 July 2007
File:Animalibrí.gif
 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Israeli-Palestinian conflictMain page: Talk:Israeli-Palestinian_conflict § UnprotectionUser:Suicup is trying to push some of his/her own POV on the Israeli-Palestinian conflict page by claiming that "Israeli settlements in the West Bank and East Jerusalem are a key obstacle to a peaceful resolution of the conflict" (emphasis added). All fair-minded Misplaced Pages editors with a working knowledge of WP:NPOV have agreed that a more neutral word (such as "a factor" rather than "a key obstacle") would be more appropriate. Suicup claims to be unbiased in this matter, and yet in the debate, he/she accused those that challenged him to be "a clique of pro-Israeli contributors," implying that (1) Suicup is anti-Israel and therefore the lone voice of reason and (2) that there is a Jewish conspiracy on Misplaced Pages. Any help in this matter would be appreciated. Thanks. --GHcool 06:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) WP:V opinion requestHi there, do you have an opinion on which of these formulations of a paragraph in this policy is preferable? Tim Vickers 16:30, 7 July 2007 (UTC) User:XotheusedguyoxNow his ban is over, he is again going against established consensus, and will probably break the 3RR again wihtout blinking. Any suggestions for further action? --Jamdav86 17:08, 7 July 2007 (UTC) |
