| Revision as of 19:24, 7 July 2007 editClpo13 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators45,651 editsm added bit to intro here← Previous edit | Revision as of 07:54, 9 July 2007 edit undoDreamGuy (talk | contribs)33,601 editsNo edit summaryNext edit → | ||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
| Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page! Much appreciated. --] 06:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page! Much appreciated. --] 06:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :No problem. Always a pleasure to help out a fellow anti-vandalism user.--] 06:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | :No problem. Always a pleasure to help out a fellow anti-vandalism user.--] 06:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Beating a dead horse == | |||
| You put this nonsense on my talk page, which I am moving here so it doesn't waste space on mine: | |||
| '':I don't know what your problem with ] is, but your little edit war on ] is really becoming annoying (that's not even going into how many times the ] has been broken). A number of editors are trying to come to some kind of compromise regarding the section on Photoshopping, but your constant reverts are getting in the way. Now, I'm not saying your contributions are wrong, but you have yet to give solid reasons for the mass content removals you keep doing. Please, discuss your edits and allow some kind of consensus to be made. Heck, bring in a mediator if you must. Constantly reverting edits does nothing for an article. I would think a person who constantly throws Misplaced Pages policy links around would know that best.'' --] 06:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
| My problem isn't with Dickylon, my problem is, just as I have mentioned in the edit comments and on talk, that rather trivial mentions of amateur neologisms backed up by unreliable sources should not be given undue weight on an article about a serious topic, especially when there is already other articles more than adequately covering those specific topics. I don't particularly care if you think my reverts are "getting in the way", and it's sheer nonsense anyway as I have continually made compromises, just more in line with policy and not just throwing bones to the Dickylon character that STILL end up as an end result violating several Misplaced Pages policies. If you want to talk about reverts being bad for the article, it's Dickylon who has repeatedly ignored discussion of the problems with his version on the talk page and continually forced it back in over and over. And if you ought to go reread the 3RR policy if you are under the misguided belief that I violated it. And if you think I have "yet to give solid reasons" you just haven't been paying attention. Constantly reverting BAD edits DOES plenty for an article: it gets rid of bad edits. And anyone with any sense would know that. Thanks to my not rolling over dead when Dickylon over and over ignored everything and insisting that it not be ignored, the vast majority of his crap has already been taken out, so I have accomplished far more than anyone else there just to get it going. It still needs a fair bit more, and that's what I intend to do. Oh, and if you must make nonsensical accusations about my edits and false claims about not giving reasons, etc., please keep it off my talk page. I have enough clueless people making false accusations there as it is, I don't need any more of it. If you do post any more such nonsense on my talk page I will nust move it here again or delete it completely. ] 07:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 07:54, 9 July 2007
| This is Clpo13's talk page, where you can send him messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32 |
 Archives |
Put your rants or raves below. Be nice. Also, I'll reply on this talk page, not yours, unless otherwise requested.
Westlife are Irish not British
I've reverted your change to Westlife (diff), as they are an Irish boy band, and defenitely not British. I'm sure it was an honest mistake. --The.Q | Talk to me 13:29, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Ah, thanks. I just wanted to clarify what they were, but I guess I should have looked into it a bit more. --clpo13 18:00, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for the Silencer contributions
Hey, your additions and rewrites to the Silencer (game) page look really good. Thanks for spending the time to add something nice to that page. --Eptin 01:06, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
- No problem! Fixing things up are what I'm here for. --clpo13 05:44, 16 June 2007 (UTC)
calories/joules
Yeah, since it's a food, I could only assume that Calories was meant instead of calories, so I changed it back. If an egg yolk had only 60 calories, well, that wouldn't be too nutritious... Oh, and as to that earlier revert: I agree, eggs are not fruit :) digfarenough (talk) 01:51, 18 June 2007 (UTC)
Jedi Exile
Please see the discussion page before making any edits to the article about the Exile’s gender please. I don’t want you to get into trouble with that article or anything like several people have. Thank you.--The Matrix Prime 05:53, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
- Don't want me to get into trouble? Excuse me, but ever since I got involved in the Exile article, I've discussed all my edits regarding the gender on the talk page. You are the one who's been reverting without discussing, which is a big no-no. --clpo13 17:31, 25 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you!
Thanks for reverting the vandalism of my user page! Much appreciated. --Bonadea 06:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Always a pleasure to help out a fellow anti-vandalism user.--clpo13 06:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Beating a dead horse
You put this nonsense on my talk page, which I am moving here so it doesn't waste space on mine: :I don't know what your problem with Dicklyon is, but your little edit war on Photo editing is really becoming annoying (that's not even going into how many times the three-revert rule has been broken). A number of editors are trying to come to some kind of compromise regarding the section on Photoshopping, but your constant reverts are getting in the way. Now, I'm not saying your contributions are wrong, but you have yet to give solid reasons for the mass content removals you keep doing. Please, discuss your edits and allow some kind of consensus to be made. Heck, bring in a mediator if you must. Constantly reverting edits does nothing for an article. I would think a person who constantly throws Misplaced Pages policy links around would know that best. --clpo13 06:12, 9 July 2007 (UTC) My problem isn't with Dickylon, my problem is, just as I have mentioned in the edit comments and on talk, that rather trivial mentions of amateur neologisms backed up by unreliable sources should not be given undue weight on an article about a serious topic, especially when there is already other articles more than adequately covering those specific topics. I don't particularly care if you think my reverts are "getting in the way", and it's sheer nonsense anyway as I have continually made compromises, just more in line with policy and not just throwing bones to the Dickylon character that STILL end up as an end result violating several Misplaced Pages policies. If you want to talk about reverts being bad for the article, it's Dickylon who has repeatedly ignored discussion of the problems with his version on the talk page and continually forced it back in over and over. And if you ought to go reread the 3RR policy if you are under the misguided belief that I violated it. And if you think I have "yet to give solid reasons" you just haven't been paying attention. Constantly reverting BAD edits DOES plenty for an article: it gets rid of bad edits. And anyone with any sense would know that. Thanks to my not rolling over dead when Dickylon over and over ignored everything and insisting that it not be ignored, the vast majority of his crap has already been taken out, so I have accomplished far more than anyone else there just to get it going. It still needs a fair bit more, and that's what I intend to do. Oh, and if you must make nonsensical accusations about my edits and false claims about not giving reasons, etc., please keep it off my talk page. I have enough clueless people making false accusations there as it is, I don't need any more of it. If you do post any more such nonsense on my talk page I will nust move it here again or delete it completely. DreamGuy 07:54, 9 July 2007 (UTC)