Misplaced Pages

:Requests for comment/Gnixon: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment Browse history interactivelyNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 00:16, 18 July 2007 editOrangemarlin (talk | contribs)30,771 edits Starting RfC  Revision as of 00:47, 18 July 2007 edit undoFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →Users certifying the basis for this disputeNext edit →
Line 110: Line 110:
=== Users certifying the basis for this dispute === === Users certifying the basis for this dispute ===
:#] 00:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC) :#] 00:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:#] 00:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
:#


=== Other users who endorse this summary === === Other users who endorse this summary ===

Revision as of 00:47, 18 July 2007

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: ~~~~), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 07:43, 4 January 2025 (UTC).

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

This user makes POV pushing edits to controversial articles such as Misplaced Pages:Featured article review/Intelligent design, Intelligent design, Evolution, Creation-evolution controversy, Physics, Abortion and the discussion pages for each. This user's edits and commentary contravene WP:NPOV, WP:POINT, WP:V, WP:RS and WP:OR. He has also posted unfounded complaints on WP:AN/I about other editors regarding WP:STALK, WP:CIVIL, WP:TALK and other issues in order to harass and intimidate those users with opposing viewpoints. In addition, Gnixon has engaged in WP:CANVAS, WP:NPA and failing to utilize WP:AGF.

Desired outcome

No further editing to any Evolution or Creation articles. One month ban from editing. No further posting to AN/I without discussing with two independent administrators.

Description

This user has been reverting edits by other users to push his own POV, refactoring talk pages, posting inappropriate and harassing complaints to AN/I, joining in an canvass to remove an article from FA status, and engaging in edit wars to push POV. Gnixon has a habit of utilizing the Misplaced Pages process to file complaints to reduce

Evidence of disputed behavior

(Provide diffs. Links to entire articles aren't helpful unless the editor created the entire article. Edit histories also aren't helpful as they change as new edits are performed.)

  1. First ANI
  2. Second ANI
  3. Reprimand for pushing second ANI
  4. Third ANI
  5. Reverting of removal of NPOV tag--asked to discuss but still places tag
  6. Uncivil remarks after being warned about NPOV tagging
  7. addition of POV material to Evolution article
  8. POV-pushing
  9. Created POV tone by claiming removal of POV
  10. Further POV-pushing
  11. Personal attack in edit summary
  12. POV-pushing
  13. Refactoring Talk:Evolution without discussion
  14. Editing someone else's comments in same discussion
  15. Major refactoring without discussion
  16. Deleting other user's formatting
  17. Major refactoring without discussion
  18. POV without any concurrence anywhere
  19. Addition of POV statements to discredit author
  20. Addition of POV statements to discredit author
  21. Incorrect POV interpretation of theory and fact
  22. Editing editor's contribution to Talk section
  23. Making POV even harsher
  24. Attempting to characterize an author by their religious affiliation
  25. Edit warring
  26. Massive refactoring with personal attack on edit summary
  27. POV pushing to make a point
  28. Reprimand from Admin
  29. Another reprimand
  30. POV pushing though subtle by describing scientists as boneheads
  31. POV pushing
  32. Revert of deletion of a POV image
  33. Supporting an POV editor that has been banned by the community
  34. Equating the Matrix to Intelligent design in a manner to push the POV
  35. Deleting a talk page commentary and classifying it as rude, and stalking the editor
  36. POV pushing
  37. Accusation of sweeping changes to an article similar to Evolution
  38. Civility issue
  39. Civility
  40. Edit warring and POV pushing
  41. Editing another person's comments on talk page
  42. POV pushing and complaining
  43. Claiming a cabal on controversial issues
  44. Support for a community banned editor in POV editing
  45. Uncivil commentary
  46. Highly POV edit proposal for lead of controversial article
  47. Major edits to Evolution without consensus or discussion
  48. Uncivil attack on editor
  49. False accusation
  50. Uncivil attack on editor
  51. Uncivil attack on admin
  52. Uncivil attack on another admin
  53. Uncivil commentary
  54. Trying to remove editors from editing article
  55. Large edits without consensus or discussion
  56. Uncivil commentary
  57. Personal attack
  58. POV pushing on Intelligent design
  59. POV pushing
  60. POV pushing
  61. POV pushing and personal attack
  62. After being canvassed to join this FAR, accuses others of being "owners"
  63. False accusations, not assuming good faith
  64. POV pushing
  65. POV pushing by asking to replace editors
  66. POV pushing after being canvassed to join
  67. POV proposal
  68. Massive edits without consensus or discussion
  69. Personal attack and POV pushing
  70. Massive edits without consensus or discussion
  71. Attempted removal of uncivil personal attack
  72. Four days of massive edits without consensus or discussion


Applicable policies and guidelines

{list the policies and guidelines that apply to the disputed conduct}

  1. WP:NPOV
  2. WP:CIVIL
  3. WP:NPA
  4. WP:POINT
  5. WP:STALK
  6. WP:TALK
  7. WP:VERIFY
  8. WP:CANVASS
  9. WP:AGF

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

(provide diffs and links)

  1. First ANI
  2. Second ANI
  3. Reprimand for pushing second ANI
  4. Third ANI

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

  1. Orangemarlin 00:16, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
  2. Filll 00:47, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}


Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.