| Revision as of 16:06, 1 August 2007 editTiamut (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers31,614 edits →Deleting material between 4,000 and 6,000 bytes of sourced material at two articles← Previous edit | Revision as of 16:32, 1 August 2007 edit undoJayjg (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Administrators134,922 edits →Deleting material between 4,000 and 6,000 bytes of sourced material at two articlesNext edit → | ||
| Line 50: | Line 50: | ||
| Could you explain you deletion of sourced material at ] and ]? The deletion of sourced material without explanation or discussion is considered vandalism. Thank you. ] 16:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | Could you explain you deletion of sourced material at ] and ]? The deletion of sourced material without explanation or discussion is considered vandalism. Thank you. ] 16:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| :No, actually, it's not. Read ] and stop trying to bully people. ]<sup><small><font color="DarkGreen">]</font></small></sup> 16:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 16:32, 1 August 2007
| This is Armon's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Archives: Index, 1 |
Please Note:
From now on, I will respond to conversations started on this page, here. Cheers, <<-armon->>
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions made on January 2 2007 to Middle_East_Media_Research_Institute
- I apologize for that. I made it in error and went to sleep before seeing the msg to self revert (which may not have been enough anyway). Until further notice, I'm placing myself on WP:1RR because a) I can't seem to count reverts properly, especially when there is more than one contentious passage, and b) edit warring is counterproductive anyway.
I don't think it's possible to be unblocked from talk pages but still blocked from articles and there's no basis for requesting an unblock, so discussions I'm involved in will have to wait 24 hours. <<-armon->> 00:50, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
User notice: temporary 3RR block
Regarding reversions made on February 24 2007 to Middle East Media Research Institute
Also, I don't see any discussion from you recently
William M. Connolley 14:44, 24 February 2007 (UTC)- I haven't breeched 3RR on the MEMRI page on the 24th -or since my last block as far as I can tell. In fact, I've been trying to stick to 1RR even if I make what's effectively a rv in a series of distinct edits which I explain in the edit summaries. I HAVE been reverting non RS cites and OR. I have discussed this on talk, ad nauseam, to no avail. In any case, I believe this was made in error so please unblock.
- A thousand apologies - I got the dates wrong. Unblocked in a moment... William M. Connolley 22:14, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks William. <<-armon->> 22:26, 24 February 2007 (UTC)
Request For Mediation
A request for mediation has been filed with the Mediation Committee that lists you as a party. The Mediation Committee requires that all parties listed in a mediation must be notified of the mediation. Please review the request at Misplaced Pages:Requests for mediation/David Irving, and indicate whether you agree or refuse to mediate. If you are unfamiliar with mediation, please refer to Misplaced Pages:Mediation. There are only seven days for everyone to agree, so please check as soon as possible.
RfC
Just wanted to let you know that I opened an RfC on myself in response to the concerns raised during my RfA over my actions in the Gary Weiss dispute. The RfC is located here and I welcome any comments or questions you may have. CLA 05:10, 2 June 2007 (UTC)
Arbitration
Hello. I've requested arbitration on the disagreement over the MEMRI page which includes you as an interested party. Currently at Misplaced Pages:Requests for Arbitration. Thanks, Jgui 15:24, 14 June 2007 (UTC)
Deleting other editors talk page comments
Could you explain your actions at talk:Al-Aqsa Intifada? Tiamat 17:23, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
- See WP:NOT#Community. My comment may not have been civil enough, his certainly wasn't. In any case, nothing new was said, therefore it was a waste of space which just fills up the talk page with cruft and makes it more difficult to get fresh editors to comment. <<-armon->> 21:31, 25 July 2007 (UTC)
Deleting material between 4,000 and 6,000 bytes of sourced material at two articles
Could you explain you deletion of sourced material at Palestinian people and House demolition in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict? The deletion of sourced material without explanation or discussion is considered vandalism. Thank you. Tiamat 16:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- No, actually, it's not. Read WP:VANDAL and stop trying to bully people. Jayjg 16:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)