| Revision as of 05:20, 7 August 2007 editBurningclean (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers13,668 edits →Archiving← Previous edit | Revision as of 05:24, 7 August 2007 edit undoLester (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users6,805 edits Fact tagsNext edit → | ||
| Line 220: | Line 220: | ||
| Thank you for the help. To move them to the archive page do I just copy past select ones onto the other page? ] <sub style="color: red;">[]]</sub> 05:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | Thank you for the help. To move them to the archive page do I just copy past select ones onto the other page? ] <sub style="color: red;">[]]</sub> 05:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Fact tags == | |||
| Hi Spebi. | |||
| I will add the FACT tags to the John Howard article. I don't want to be the one to delete them (at least not yet), though I see that others have started deleting. I just point out the questionable "facts", and others can deal with it somehow, by rewriting and sourcing the information, or just deleting them. Best wishes, ] 05:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:24, 7 August 2007
Misplaced Pages:Peer review/Age of MythologyMy last peer review took a month! Thanks for this :D Hope to see you back soon (if indeed you are on break/retired), from your overly loyal companion, Giggy UP 08:50, 27 July 2007 (UTC)
Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship/GiggyYour Strongest oppose was in the support section, so I moved it to the oppose section, but is that really what you meant? --Stephen 10:10, 28 July 2007 (UTC)
Boinkz! mail lately, Mr. Lotsa hugs! :) Phaedriel 10:44, 28 July 2007 (UTC) GACGAC is a process for determining which articles are good articles per the good article criteria. It's very informal, but you basically stick your article in the appropriate section, and someone comes and reviews it (instructions are all on the page). Ask me if you need any more info. Giggy UP 22:01, 29 July 2007 (UTC) Thanks hugely......for reverting vandalism to my userpage...greatly appreciated :o) Drivenapart 07:56, 30 July 2007 (UTC) My RfAHi, Spebi, and thanks for your participation in my RfA. I've withdrawn it, and will be writing up an "analysis" of it, which will soon be available at User:Giggy/RfA/Giggy when it's done. Please come around when you get the chance, and give me feedback on how I can improve. Strong oppose if you ever run for it :P Thanks again, Giggy UP 04:11, 31 July 2007 (UTC) In regards to wikilinksI had always thought it was supposed to be only one link per article, too. But in the Misplaced Pages:Manual of Style (links) it says "Good places for link duplication are often the first time the term occurs in each article subsection" and that only one link can actually be underlinking in a long article. V-train 05:10, 2 August 2007 (UTC) August 2007
Signpost updated for July 30th, 2007.Apologies for the late delivery this week; my plans to handle this while on vacation went awry. Ral315
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 00:35, 4 August 2007 (UTC) CanberraThanks for the explanation. I lived in Canberra for 30 years before moving to Sydney 4 years ago, and the reasons I added the information are: - most people may be unaware that Canberra has produced those players (apart from the Canberra Raiders and Brumbies players) - the article on Canberra has a mix of history weaved into its sections, and this is important sports history for Canberra - Canberra is seen by many people outside the ACT as lacking character. Recognition of sporting success is a very good tool for countering this. I was also hoping that others may be inspired to add famous Canberrans to other sections of the article e.g. artists and entertainers, business people - If the list needs to be shortened then I would suggest sticking to O'Connor, Campese, Hird, Jesaulenko and Bevan. Cheers —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Busterjp (talk • contribs). ArticleHistory templateJust a note, Project assessments (B-class) aren't part of the articlehistory template, and trigger an error. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:08, 5 August 2007 (UTC) Template:Archive Box VistaA template you created, Template:Archive Box Vista, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the How have you been?Hello there Sebi. How have you been mate? Haven't spoken to you lately and I don't really go on WLM anymore, but I'm also busy in real life so I am not really editing much now. I hope I can get back to my old editing rate before I go on my 4 week camp leaving August 27. I'm looking forward to that. Let me know how you're going and what has been happening. Kind regards, — E bots 07:38, 6 August 2007 (UTC)  — E bots has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! SigI've replied to the lot of you at my talk page!! :) Pedro | Chat 08:07, 6 August 2007 (UTC) For you
Noob!Giggy Talk | Review has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
DollyGladly, my friend, but do the people involved with the article know of your devious plans? :) (i.e. Any discussion about the page move anywhere?) ~ Riana ⁂ 08:29, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Misplaced Pages better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 11:18, 6 August 2007 (UTC) ThanksThanks a lot for the Smile. Ireally appreciate it! Cheers! -- Anonymous Dissident 03:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Can you comment on this articleCan you comment on this article - http://en.wikipedia.org/Don%27t_Damn_Me —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Brownstone999 (talk • contribs). I want to insult you, but I don't feel like being a jerk at the moment. Brownstone999 04:28, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Spebi, we don't know for sure what he meant by that article. Look you may say "dude, just chill out, be cool about it, and don't over-think it. You must have NO LIFE to over-think something so ******* small". Well I just had alot of sugar and what not. Thus I'm hyper and tend to anaylize things a little bit more deeply while I'm hyper. If we contacted Geffen Records, do you think we could get to Axl's publicist? Brownstone999 04:35, 7 August 2007 (UTC) ArchivingI was wondering if you could tell me how to archive my talk page. Thank you if you can. Skeeker 05:08, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Thank you for the help. To move them to the archive page do I just copy past select ones onto the other page? Skeeker 05:20, 7 August 2007 (UTC) Fact tagsHi Spebi. I will add the FACT tags to the John Howard article. I don't want to be the one to delete them (at least not yet), though I see that others have started deleting. I just point out the questionable "facts", and others can deal with it somehow, by rewriting and sourcing the information, or just deleting them. Best wishes, Lester2 05:24, 7 August 2007 (UTC) |
||||||||||||||||||||
