Misplaced Pages

Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 08:07, 8 August 2007 editSteven Andrew Miller (talk | contribs)3,958 edits See talk page.← Previous edit Revision as of 08:23, 8 August 2007 edit undoEleemosynary (talk | contribs)4,174 edits rvv. Crockspot, make sure to report us both for 3RR.Next edit →
Line 50: Line 50:
== See Also == == See Also ==
*] *]
*]
*]


== References == == References ==

Revision as of 08:23, 8 August 2007

This article may be affected by the following current event: The New Republic. Information in this article may change rapidly as the event progresses. Initial news reports may be unreliable. The last updates to this article may not reflect the most current information. Please feel free to improve this article (but note that updates without valid and reliable references will be removed) or discuss changes on the talk page. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

The Scott Thomas Beauchamp controversy concerns the publication of a series of diaries by Scott Thomas Beauchamp (b. 1983 East St. Louis, Illinois) - a private in the United States Army, serving in the Iraq War, and a member of Alpha Company, 1/18 Infantry, Second Brigade Combat Team, First Infantry Division.

In the The New Republic, under the pen name "Scott Thomas", Beauchamp posted three entries about serving at FOB Falcon, Baghdad. These entries concerned misconduct by soliders, including Beauchamp, during the occupation of Iraq.

"Baghdad Diarist"

After the publication of an entry called "Shock Troops," The Weekly Standard and The National Review questioned the veracity of Beauchamp's claims. As the controversy continued, The Washington Post reported that Beauchamp did not provide documentation for his three published columns.

New Republic editor Franklin Foer disclosed that Beauchamp is married to Elspeth Reeve, a New Republic reporter and researcher, and that his relationship with Reeve was "part of the reason why we found him to be a credible writer." According to Foer, the magazine had planned to "re-report every detail", but their investigation was "short circuited" after the Army severed Beauchamp's communications with anyone overseas.

In a follow-up posting on The New Republic, Beauchamp objected to claims of falsification: "It's been maddening...to see the plausibility of events that I witnessed questioned by people who have never served in Iraq. I was initially reluctant to take the time out of my already insane schedule fighting an actual war in order to play some role in an ideological battle that I never wanted to join."

"Shock Troops"

In the diary entry, Beauchamp described how he ridiculed a woman whose face had been severely burned: "I love chicks that have been intimate with IEDs," Beauchamp quotes himself as saying, loudly, to his friends in the chow hall. "It really turns me on -- melted skin, missing limbs, plastic noses," he recounted. "My friend was practically falling out of his chair laughing...The disfigured woman slammed her cup down and ran out of the chow hall."

Next, he described finding the remains of children in a mass grave uncovered while his unit constructed a combat outpost: "One private...found the top part of a human skull... As he marched around with the skull on his head, people dropped shovels and sandbags, folding in half with laughter...No one was disgusted. Me included."

Finally, Beauchamp described another soldier "who only really enjoyed driving Bradley Fighting Vehicles because it gave him the opportunity to run things over. He took out curbs, concrete barriers, corners of buildings, stands in the market, and his favorite target: dogs." Beauchamp described how the soldier killed three dogs in one day: "He slowed the Bradley down to lure the first kill in, and, as the diesel engine grew quieter, the dog walked close enough for him to jerk the machine hard to the right and snag its leg under the tracks."

New Republic investigation

In an August 2 statement, after an internal investigation, editors for The New Republic corroborated Beauchamp's claims, with one exception - that the conversation about the disfigured woman had occurred at Camp Buehring in Kuwait, not Iraq, an error for which The New Republic apologized to its readers. According to the statement, five members of Beauchamp's company had also confirmed the other aspects of Beauchamp's entry.

We...spoke with current and former soldiers, forensic experts, and other journalists who have covered the war extensively. And we sought assistance from Army Public Affairs officers. Most important, we spoke with five other members of Beauchamp's company, and all corroborated Beauchamp's anecdotes, which they witnessed or, in the case of one solider, heard about contemporaneously. (All of the soldiers we interviewed who had first-hand knowledge of the episodes requested anonymity.)

The statement continued to say that the Army's investigation had impeded their own investigation, because communication with Beauchamp had been cut off, and "his fellow soldiers no longer feel comfortable communicating with reporters...If further substantive information comes to light, TNR will, of course, share it with you."

Military investigation

An Army investigation concluded the the allegations made by Beauchamp were false. Howard Kurtz of The Washington Post reported that the Army statement said "His platoon and company were interviewed and no one could substantiate the claims."

A military official, who asked not to be identified because the probe is confidential, said no charges were filed against Beauchamp. Instead, the official said, the matter is being handled administratively, with Beauchamp punished by having his cellphone and laptop confiscated for an undetermined period.

A military official said Beauchamp had committed two violations, making false statements and not obtaining permission to publish the articles, which were written under the name Scott Thomas.

Kurtz also quoted Mark Feldstein, a journalism professor at George Washington University, concerning the conflicting outcomes of the investigations by the military and The New Republic:

There is a cloud over the New Republic, but there's one hanging over the Army, as well. Each investigated this and cleared themselves, but they both have vested interests.

Dispute over alleged recantation

On August 6, 2007, the Weekly Standard's blog reported that Scott Thomas Beauchamp recanted under oath to Army investigators.

On August 7, The New Republic reported

"We've talked to military personnel directly involved in the events that Scott Thomas Beauchamp described, and they corroborated his account as detailed in our statement. When we called Army spokesman Major Steven F. Lamb and asked about an anonymously sourced allegation that Beauchamp had recanted his articles in a sworn statement, he told us, 'I have no knowledge of that.' He added, 'If someone is speaking anonymously , they are on their own.' When we pressed Lamb for details on the Army investigation, he told us, 'We don't go into the details of how we conduct our investigations.'"

Michael Goldfarb and the Weekly Standard are standing by the story. The New York Times confirms that the Army has declared the Beauchamp's stories to be false.

See Also

References

  1. "A Statement From Scott Thomas Beauchamp". The Plank. The New Republic. 2007-07-26. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  2. ^ Cohen, Patricia (2007-07-28). "Shedding Pen Name, Private Says He's 'Baghdad Diarist'". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  3. Preston, Bryan (2007-07-28). "The Beauchamp story: Why we care". Hot Air. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  4. Goldfarb, Michael (2007-07-31). "Reporting From FOB Falcon". Worldwide Standard. The Weekly Standard. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  5. Kurtz, Howard (2007-07-27). "Army Private Discloses He Is New Republic's Baghdad Diarist". The Washington Post. p. C07. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  6. ^ "A Statement on Scott Thomas Beauchamp". The New Republic Online. The New Republic. 2007-08-02. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  7. Thomas, Scott (2007-07-23). "Shock Troops". The New Republic. p. 56. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  8. Kurtz, Howard (2007-08-03). "Editors Confirm Soldier's Claims". The Washington Post. p. C02. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  9. ^ Kurtz, Howard (2007-08-08). "Army Concludes Baghdad Diarist Accounts Untrue". The Washington Post. p. C01. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  10. Goldfarb, Michael (2007-08-06). "Beauchamp Recants". Worldwide Standard. The Weekly Standard. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  11. Goldfarb, Michael (2007-08-07). "Beauchamp Recants: Update". Worldwide Standard. The Weekly Standard. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite web}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  12. Cohen, Patrica (2007-08-08). "Army Says Soldier's Articles for Magazine Were False". The New York Times. Retrieved 2007-08-08. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)

External links

Categories: