Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 15:12, 12 August 2007

Welcome!

Hello QuackGuru! Welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions to this 💕. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Cool Cosmos 20:28, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Getting started Misplaced Pages tutorial • The five pillars of Misplaced Pages How to: edit a page • upload and use images Getting help Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Misplaced Pages is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The community Build consensus • Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost • IRC channels • Mailing lists Writing articles Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review Miscellaneous User name • User pages • Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

"Back door"

Why on earth do you accuse me of adding a "back door" litigation section? I'm trimming the footnotes every time to remove unnecessary detail, but some context has to be given or the citations have no meaning at all. If you insist on doing this, I'm afraid the litigation section will have to be longer, but I think that's an affront to our policies, especially WEIGHT. Moving this context to the footnotes is expressly allowed per FOOT, and I think you should stop reaction to every user's with reverts. I'm on "your side" forchrissakes. Cool Hand Luke 06:11, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

I fully agree with Luke here. Please leave it as is and quit edit warring. You are doing the Barrett article a great disservice by your disruptive style of confrontational editing. -- Fyslee/talk 06:14, 12 August 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. -- Levine2112 15:12, 12 August 2007 (UTC)