| Revision as of 23:05, 12 August 2007 editStr1977 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,123 edits rm para ... it is unnecessary and also endorses a certain POV← Previous edit | Revision as of 23:19, 12 August 2007 edit undoStr1977 (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers59,123 edits →History: restore the original order of the section, rm unnecessary (and partly dubious) details, and wrong additions about Ebionites vanishing before they ever appeared in sourcesNext edit → | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
| As the Ebionites are first mentioned as such in the 2nd century, their earlier history and their relation to the first Jersualem church remains obscure and a matter of contention. | As the Ebionites are first mentioned as such in the 2nd century, their earlier history and their relation to the first Jersualem church remains obscure and a matter of contention. | ||
| ⚫ | Many scholars link the origin of the Ebionites with the ], during which Christians left Jerusalem and fled to ] beyond the ].<ref name="RGG"/><ref name="Eisenman 1997"/><ref name="Tabor 2006"/><ref name="Uhlhorn"/> These scholars relate that transjordan Jewish Christians opened themselves to Jewish and gnostic-syncretist influences, resulting in a "degeneration" into an exclusively Jewish sect. This places the Ebionites in the context of the gnostic baptism movement widespread in Syria and Palestine. It is also possible that Essene remnants merged into Ebionitic groups east of the Jordan after 70 CE.<ref name="RGG"/> These scholars argue that with the death of James in 62, the ] the importance of the ] began to fade and was eclipsed by ], which spread throughout the ]. | ||
| ⚫ | Tabor and ] argue that the Ebionites preceded the ministry of Jesus. They consider them initially the Jewish followers of ], regarded as a priestly or ]ic ]<ref name="Tabor 2006"/><ref name=" Rabinowitz 2004">{{cite book| author = Rabinowitz, Jacob | title = | publisher = Invisible Books | year = 2004}}</ref>, which was later joined and co-lead by Jesus, who they regarded as the royal or ]ic Jewish Messiah. After John's death they continued to follow the ], and later that of Jesus' brother ] , <ref>Compare .</ref>. These scholars relate that, at some point, the movement organized itself into ] in several cities.<ref name="Tabor 2006"/> | ||
| ]<ref name="Eisenman 1997"/> and ]<ref name="Tabor 2006"/>, closely link the Ebionites with the Jerusalem church headed by Jesus' brother ], which they identify with the "]" that opposed and were denounced by the ]<ref>For instance, in his ] (see especially )</ref> and the men from Judea who, according to the ] insisted on the necessity of ] of ] converts for salvation.<ref></ref> |
Other scholars, such as ]<ref name="Eisenman 1997"/> and ]<ref name="Tabor 2006"/>, closely link the Ebionites with the Jerusalem church headed by Jesus' brother ], which they identify with the "]" that opposed and were denounced by the ]<ref>For instance, in his ] (see especially )</ref> and the men from Judea who, according to the ] insisted on the necessity of ] of ] converts for salvation.<ref></ref>. | ||
| ⚫ | Tabor and ] argue that the Ebionites preceded the ministry of Jesus. They consider them initially the Jewish followers of ], regarded as a priestly or ]ic ]<ref name="Tabor 2006"/><ref name=" Rabinowitz 2004">{{cite book| author = Rabinowitz, Jacob | title = | publisher = Invisible Books | year = 2004}}</ref>, which was later joined and co-lead by Jesus, who they regarded as the royal or ]ic Jewish Messiah. After John's death they continued to follow the ], and later that of Jesus' brother ] , <ref>Compare .</ref>. These scholars relate that, at some point, the movement organized itself into ] in several cities.<ref name="Tabor 2006"/> | ||
| ⚫ | |||
| Many scholars consider the ] in 135, which brought about the elimination of the Jerusalem Church, still headed by ]<ref name="Maccoby 1987">{{cite book| author = ]| title = The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity| publisher = HarperCollins | year = 1987 | id = ISBN 0062505858}}</ref>, and the refounding of Jerusalem as a ] off limits to Jews, a major step in the detachment of the increasingly dispersed ] and the spreading Gentile Christianity. | Many scholars consider the ] in 135, which brought about the elimination of the Jerusalem Church, still headed by ]<ref name="Maccoby 1987">{{cite book| author = ]| title = The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity| publisher = HarperCollins | year = 1987 | id = ISBN 0062505858}}</ref>, and the refounding of Jerusalem as a ] off limits to Jews, a major step in the detachment of the increasingly dispersed ] and the spreading Gentile Christianity. | ||
Revision as of 23:19, 12 August 2007
The Ebionites (Greek: Ebionaioi from Hebrew; אביונים, Evyonim, "the Poor Ones") were an early Jewish Christian sect that lived in and around the land of Israel in the 1st to the 5th century CE.
Without authenticated archaeological evidence for the existence of the Ebionites, their views and practices can only be reconstructed from textual references. Much of what is known about them derives from the Fathers of the Church, who wrote polemics against the Ebionites, whom they deemed judaizing heretics. Several modern scholars, however, drawing on broader sources (whilst including the Chuch Fathers) contest the traditional portrayal of Ebionites, concluding that they were, or developed from, the original disciples of John the Baptist, his cousin Jesus the Nazarene and Jesus' brother James the Just, and that they were more faithful than the followers of Paul to the original teachings of the historical Jesus.
Name
The term Ebionites derives from the Hebrew Evyonim, meaning "the Poor Ones".
Poverty, especially characteristic of the Christians of Jerusalem, evoked from the Pagans and Jews the contemptuous appellation of "the poor". Christians however adopted the term as a reference to religious poverty, in line with Jesus' Sermon on the Mount
The Greek equivalent ptôchoi appears in the New Testament, possibly as an honorary title of the Jerusalem church. The term also has parallels the Psalms and the self-given term of pious Jewish circles
The term was at first a common designation for all Christians. Following schisms within the early Christian communities, the graecized Hebrew term "Ebionite" was applied exclusively to Jewish Christians separated from the Catholic Church, and later in the fourth century a specific group of Jewish Christians or to a Jewish Christian sect distinct from the Nazarenes. All the while, the designation "the Poor" in other languages was still used in it original, more general sense.
Origen reinterprets the name Ebionites as a reference to "their low views of Christ". Another inaccurate explanation was Tertullian's derivation from a fictinal heresiarch called Ebion.
History
| Part of a series on |
| Jewish Christianity |
|---|
|
| Figures |
| Ancient groups |
| Recent groups |
| Pejoratives |
| Adversity |
Writings
|
| Issues |
The Ebionites are mentioned or referred to by various Fathers of the Church. The earliest reference to a group that might fit the description of the Ebionites appears in Justin Martyr's Dialogue with Trypho (c. 140). Justin distinguishes between Jewish Christians who observe the Law of Moses but do not require its observance of others, and those who believe the Mosaic Law to be obligatory on all. Irenaeus (c. 180) was the first to use the term "Ebionites" to describe a heretical judaizing sect, which he regarded as stubbornly clinging to the Law. Origen in c. 212 remarks that the name derives from the Hebrew word "evyon," meaning "poor." Epiphanius of Salamis in the 4th century gives the most complete but also questionable account in his heresiology called Panarion, denouncing eighty heretical sects, among them the Ebionites. Epiphanius mostly gives general descriptions of their religious beliefs and includes quotations from their gospels, which have not survived.
The actual scope of the term Ebionites is difficult to ascertain, as the contradictory patristic accounts in their attempt to distinguish various sects, sometimes confuse them with each other. Other groups mentioned are the Carpocratians, the Cerinthians, the Elcesaites, the Nasoraeans, the Nazarenes, the Nazoraeans, and the Sampsaeans, most of whom were Jewish Christian sects who held gnostic or other views rejected by the Ebionites.
As the Ebionites are first mentioned as such in the 2nd century, their earlier history and their relation to the first Jersualem church remains obscure and a matter of contention.
Many scholars link the origin of the Ebionites with the First Jewish-Roman War, during which Christians left Jerusalem and fled to Pella beyond the Jordan River. These scholars relate that transjordan Jewish Christians opened themselves to Jewish and gnostic-syncretist influences, resulting in a "degeneration" into an exclusively Jewish sect. This places the Ebionites in the context of the gnostic baptism movement widespread in Syria and Palestine. It is also possible that Essene remnants merged into Ebionitic groups east of the Jordan after 70 CE. These scholars argue that with the death of James in 62, the First Jewish-Roman War the importance of the Jewish Christianity began to fade and was eclipsed by Pauline Christianity, which spread throughout the Roman Empire.
Other scholars, such as Robert Eisenman and James Tabor, closely link the Ebionites with the Jerusalem church headed by Jesus' brother James, which they identify with the "judaizing teachers" that opposed and were denounced by the Paul of Tarsus and the men from Judea who, according to the Acts of the Apostles insisted on the necessity of circumcision of gentile converts for salvation..
Tabor and Jacob Rabinowitz argue that the Ebionites preceded the ministry of Jesus. They consider them initially the Jewish followers of John the Baptist, regarded as a priestly or Aaronic Jewish Messiah, which was later joined and co-lead by Jesus, who they regarded as the royal or Davidic Jewish Messiah. After John's death they continued to follow the ministry of Jesus, and later that of Jesus' brother James the Just , . These scholars relate that, at some point, the movement organized itself into communes in several cities.
Many scholars consider the Bar Kokhba revolt in 135, which brought about the elimination of the Jerusalem Church, still headed by Jesus' relatives, and the refounding of Jerusalem as a Roman colony off limits to Jews, a major step in the detachment of the increasingly dispersed Jewish Christianity and the spreading Gentile Christianity.
In 375, Epiphanius records the settlement of Ebionites on Cyprus, but by the mid-5th century, Theodorus of Cyprus reported that they were no longer present in the region. Most historians place the end of the Ebionites during this time.
However, some scholars argue that the Ebionites survived much longer and identify them with a sect encountered by the historian Abd al-Jabbar around the year 1000. Another possible reference to surviving Ebionite communities in northwestern Arabia, specifically the cities of Tayma and Tilmas, around the 11th century, appears in Sefer Ha'masaot, the "Book of the Travels" of Rabbi Benjamin of Tudela, a rabbi from Spain. 12th century Muslim historian Muhammad al-Shahrastani, in his book Kitab al–Milal wa al-Nihal, the "Book of Sects and Creeds", mentions Jews living in nearby Medina and Hejaz who accepted Jesus as a prophetic figure and followed traditional Judaism, rejecting mainstream Christian views.
Legacy
The legacy of the Ebionites is debated. Their views had no influence the developing Christian theology, but some scholars argued that they contributed to the development of the Islamic view of Jesus due to exchanges of Ebionite remnants with the first Muslims.
In the late 20th and early 21st centuries, several small yet competing new religious movements, such as the Ebionite Jewish Community, have emerged claiming to be revivalists of the views and practices of early Ebionites, although their idiosyncratic claims to authenticity cannot be verified.
The counter-missionary group Jews for Judaism favorably mentions the historical Ebionites in their literature in order to argue that "Messianic Judaism", as promoted by missionary groups such as Jews for Jesus, is Pauline Christianity misrepresenting itself as Judaism.
Some Messianic groups have expressed concern over leaders in Israel that deny Jesus' divinity and the possible collapse of the Messianic movement due to a resurgence of Ebionitism.
In a recent polemic, a Messianic leader asked whether Christians should imitate the Torah-observance of "neo-Ebionites".
Views and practices
Judaism
Most patristic sources portray the Ebionites as traditional yet ascetic Jews, who zealously followed the Law of Moses, revered Jerusalem as the holiest city, and restricted table fellowship only to gentiles who converted to Judaism. They celebrated a commemorative meal annually, on or around Passover, with unleavened bread and water only, in contrast to the Christian practice of performing a mystical meal in commemoration of Jesus through the daily use of bread containing leaven and wine mixed with water.
Jewish or Gnostic Christianity
Epiphanius of Salamis is the only Church Father who describes some Ebionites as departing from traditional Jewish principles of faith and practice; specifically by engaging in excessive ritual bathing, possessing an angelology which claimed that the Christ is a great archangel who was incarnated in Jesus when he was adopted as the son of God, opposing animal sacrifice, denying parts or most of the Law, and practicing religious vegetarianism.
The reliability of Epiphanius' account of the Ebionites is questioned by some scholars. Shlomo Pines, for example, argues that the heterodox views and practices he ascribes to some Ebionites originated in Gnostic Christianity rather than Jewish Christianity, and are characteristics of the Elcesaite sect, which Epiphanius mistakenly attributed to the Ebionites.
Essenism
While mainstream biblical scholars do suppose some Essene influence on the nascent Jewish-Christian Church in some organizational, administrative and cultic respects, some scholars go beyond that assumption. Among them, some hold theories which have been discredited and others which remain controversial. Regarding the Ebionites specifically, a number of scholars have different theories on how the Ebionites may have developed from an Essene Jewish messianic sect.
Robert Eisenman, James Tabor, Martin A. Larson and Keith Akers argue that the Ebionites drew much of their original inspiration from rules, customs, theology, beliefs, and even their similarity in names from the Essenes through the founding influence of John the Baptist. The fact that both the Qumran community and the Jerusalem church under James the Just referred to themselves by many epithets, including "the poor"; the religious vegetarianism of some Essene communities and of the Ebionite leaders John the Baptist, Jesus (as portrayed in the Gospel of the Ebionites) and James the Just ; and the shared customs of religious poverty, religious communism and ritual bathing of the Ebionites and the authors of the Dead Sea scrolls; are all cited as evidence for this view. Countering this view, some scholars argue that apparent similarities between John the Baptist and the Essenes may be attributed to more general traditions and practices of Second Temple Judaism, while others, such as James H. Charlesworth, whilst recognizing the influence of the Essenes on John the Baptist, consider a direct connection between the Essenes and Jesus or the early Jewish-Christians to be improbable, based on major differences in their approaches and objectives. The religious vegetarianism of the Essenes at Qumran is called into question by some following the discovery of pre-31 BCE animal bones at Qumran.
Hans-Joachim Schoeps argues that the conversion of some Essenes to Jewish Christianity after the Siege of Jerusalem in 70 CE may be the source of some Ebionites adopting Essene views and practices; while some conclude that the Essenes did not become Jewish Christians but still had an influence on the Ebionites.
Jesus
The majority of Church Fathers agree that the Ebionites rejected many of the central Christian views of Jesus such as the pre-existence, divinity, virgin birth, atoning death, and physical resurrection of Jesus. The Ebionites are described as emphasizing the oneness of God and the humanity of Jesus as the biological son of both Mary and Joseph, who by virtue of his righteousness, was chosen by God to be the messianic "prophet like Moses" (foretold in Deuteronomy 18:14-22) when he was anointed with the holy spirit at his baptism.
Of the books of the New Testament, the Ebionites are said to have accepted only a Hebrew version of the Gospel of Matthew, referred to as the Gospel of the Hebrews, as additional scripture to the Hebrew Bible. This version of Matthew, Irenaeus reports, omitted the first two chapters (on the nativity of Jesus), and started with the baptism of Jesus by John.
The Ebionites believed that all Jews and gentiles must observe the commandments in the Law of Moses, in order to become righteous and seek communion with God; but that these commandments must be understood in the light of Jesus' expounding of the Law, revealed during his sermon on the mount. The Ebionites may have held a form of "inaugurated eschatology" positing that the ministry of Jesus had ushered in the Messianic Age so that the kingdom of God might be understood as present in an incipient fashion, while at the same time awaiting consummation in the future age.
John the Baptist
In one excerpt from the Gospel of the Ebionites quoted by Epiphanius, John the Baptist is portrayed as a vegetarian Nazirite teacher of righteousness. It is a matter of debate whether John was in fact a vegetarian (a notion reinforced by the "Slavonic version" of Josephus) or whether some Ebionites (or the related Elcesaite sect which Epiphanius took for Ebionites) were projecting their vegetarianism unto him.
James the Just
Some scholars argue that the Ebionites may have claimed unique legitimacy in terms of apostolic succession from James the Just, the first bishop of Jerusalem, whom they believed the rightful leader of the Church (due to a patrilineal succession of relatives of Jesus) rather than Peter . Futhermore, they argue that the Ebionites viewed James as the legitimate high priest of Israel, by virtue of his righteousness, in opposition to the officially recognized high priest.
Paul of Tarsus
Patristic sources report Ebionites as denouncing Paul of Tarsus as an apostate from the Law of Moses. Epiphanius relates that some Ebionites alleged that Paul was a Greek who converted to Judaism in order to marry the daughter of a high priest of Israel but apostasized when she rejected him. Some scholars argue that Paul was an apostate and developed the early Christian church as a Gnostic Jewish mystery religion.
Writings
Few writings of the Ebionites have survived, and these are in uncertain form. The Recognitions of Clement and the Clementine Homilies, two 3rd century Christian works, are regarded by general scholarly consensus as largely or entirely Jewish Christian in origin and reflect Jewish Christian beliefs. The exact relationship between the Ebionites and these writings is debated, but Epiphanius's description of some Ebionites in Panarion 30 bears a striking similarity to the ideas in the Recognitions and Homilies. Scholar Glenn Alan Koch speculates that Epiphanius likely relied upon a version of the Homilies as a source document.
The 1908 Catholic Encyclopedia mentions four classes of Ebionite writings:
- Gospel of the Ebionites. According to Irenaeus, the Ebionites used only the Gospel of Matthew. Eusebius of Caesarea (Historia Ecclesiae IV, xxi, 8) mentions a Gospel of the Hebrews, often identified as the Aramaic original of Matthew, written with Hebrew letters. Such a work was known to Hegesippus (according to Eusebius, Historia Eccl., ), Origen (according to Jerome's De viris illustribus ii, and to Clement of Alexandria (Strom., II, ix, 45). Epiphanius of Salamis attributes this gospel to Nazarenes, and claims that Ebionites only possessed an incomplete, falsified, and truncated copy. (Adversus Haereses, xxix, 9). The question remains whether or not Epiphanius was able to make a genuine distinction between Nazarenes and Ebionites.
- New Testament apocrypha: The Circuits of Peter and Acts of the Apostles, including the work usually titled the Ascents of James. The first-named books are substantially contained in the Homilies of Clement under the title of Clement's Compendium of Peter's itinerary sermons, and also in the Recognitions attributed to Clement. They form an early Christian didactic fiction to express Jewish Christian views, i.e. the primacy of James the Just, their connection with the episcopal see of Rome, and their antagonism to Simon Magus, as well as gnostic doctrines. Scholar Robert Van Voorst opines of the Ascents of James (R 1.33-71), "There is, in fact, no section of the Clementine literature about whose origin in Jewish Christianity one may be more certain". Despite this assertion, he expresses reservations that the material is genuinely Ebionite in origin.
- The Works of Symmachus the Ebionite, i.e. his Koine Greek translation of the Hebrew Bible, used by Jerome, fragments of which exist, and his lost Hypomnemata, written to counter the canonical Gospel of Matthew. The latter work, which is totally lost (Eusebius, Hist. Eccl., VI, xvii; Jerome, De vir. ill., liv), is probably identical with De distinctione præceptorum, mentioned by Ebed Jesu (Assemani, Bibl. Or., III, 1).
- The Book of Elchesai (Elxai), or of "The Hidden power", claimed to have been written about 100 CE and brought to Rome in c. 217 CE by Alcibiades of Apamea. Ebionites who accepted its gnostic doctrines were judged to be apostates and called Elcesaites. (Hipp., Philos., IX, xiv-xvii; Epiphanius., Adv. Haer., xix, 1; liii, 1.)
It is also speculated that the core of the Gospel of Barnabas, beneath a polemical medieval Muslim overlay, may have been based upon an Ebionite or gnostic document. The existence and origin of this source continues to be debated by scholars.
Archaeology
Biblical scholar Jacob Rabinowitz suggested that artifacts discovered by Franciscan biblical archaeologists in Jerusalem, Hebron and Nazareth may have belonged to the first Ebionites. The artifacts, which include ossuaries, figurines and ritual objects, incorporate the cross as a decorative motif combined with other biblical symbols. The Franciscan archeologists believe they are the work of a late 3rd or 4th century heretical judaizing sect.
Religious perspectives
Christian views
The mainstream Christian view of the Ebionites is based on the polemical views of the Church Fathers who portrayed them as heretics for rejecting many of the central Christian views of Jesus, and allegedly having an improper fixation on the Law of Moses at the expense of the grace of God. In this view, the Ebionites may have been the descendants of a Jewish Christian sect within the early Jerusalem church which broke away from its orthodox theology.
Some Christian apologists have criticized the quest for the historical Jesus as having resulted in a "revival of the Ebionite heresy". Some scholars with mainstream Christian beliefs are acknowledging the recent emphasis on the Jewishness of Jesus and his earliest followers, and commenting on how they reconciled the Jewish Jesus with the Christ of faith.
Jewish views
The orthodox Jewish view of the Ebionites is that they were Jewish heretics due to their refusal to see Jesus as a false prophet and failed Jewish Messiah claimant but also for wanting to include their gospel into the canon of the Hebrew Bible.
Islamic views
Some Muslims believe that the Ebionites were "People of the Book" faithful to the authentic teachings of Jesus and his disciples with shared views about Jesus' humanity, despite Muslims believing in the virgin birth but not the crucifixion which was contrary to Ebionite belief.
References
- ^ Viljoen, Francois P. (2006). "Jesus' Teaching on the Torah in the Sermon on the Mount" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-03-13.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ Klijn A.F.J.; Reinink, G.J. (1973). Patristic Evidence for Jewish-Christian Sects. Brill. ISBN 9004037632.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Schoeps, Hans-Joachim (1969). Jewish Christianity: Factional Disputes in the Early Church. Translation Douglas R. A. Hare. Fortress Press.
- ^ Maccoby, Hyam (1987). The Mythmaker: Paul and the Invention of Christianity. HarperCollins. ISBN 0062505858." " Cite error: The named reference "Maccoby 1987" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
- ^ Eisenman, Robert (1997). James the Brother of Jesus: The Key to Unlocking the Secrets of Early Christianity and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Viking. ISBN 1842930265.
- ^ Tabor, James D. (2006). The Jesus Dynasty: A New Historical Investigation of Jesus, His Royal Family, and the Birth of Christianity. Simon & Schuster. ISBN 0743287231.
- ^ Uhlhorn, G. (1894). A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology, 3rd edn., Vol. 2. Funk & Wagnalls Company. ISBN 9004037632.
- Matthew 5,3; Luke 6,20
- Minucius Felix, Octavius, 36: "That we are called the poor is not our disgrace, but our glory."
- Romans 15, 26; Galatians 2,10
- PsSal 10, 6; 15, 1; 1 QpHab XII, 3.6.10
- ^ "Ebioniten", in Religion in Geschichte und Gegenwart, p. 7435 (vol. 2).
- ^ James Tabor, Nazarenes and Ebionites
- ORigen, Contra Celsum, II. 1
- ^ Justin Martyr, Dialogue with Trypho ch. 47.
- ^ Irenaeus of Lyon, Adversus Haereses I, 26; II,21.
- Origen, De Principiis IV, 22.
- ^ Epiphanius of Salamis, Panarion 30.
- ^ Koch, Glenn Alan (1976). A Critical Investigation of Epiphanius' Knowledge of the Ebionites: A Translation and Critical Discussion of 'Panarion' 30. University of Pennsylvania.
- For instance, in his Second epistle to the Corinthians (see especially Chapter 11)
- Acts 15
- ^ Rabinowitz, Jacob (2004). Buried Angels. Invisible Books.
{{cite book}}: External link in|title= - Compare Matthew 5:17-20.
- Wace, Henry & Piercy, William (1911). A Dictionary of Early Christian Biography. Retrieved 2007-08-01.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link) - ^ Pines, Shlomo (1966). The Jewish Christians Of The Early Centuries Of Christianity According To A New Source. Proceedings of the Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities II, No. 13. ISBN 102-255-998.
- Adler, Marcus N. (1907). The Itinerary of Benjamin of Tudela: Critical Text, Translation and Commentary, pp 70-72. Phillip Feldheim.
- Shahrastani, Muhammad (2002). The Book of Religious and Philosphical Sects, William Cureton edition, page 167. Gorgias Press.
- Self Help Guide (2006). "Jesus Christ". Retrieved 2006-02-21.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Kravitz, Bentzion (2001). The Jewish Response to Missionaries: Counter-Missionary Handbook. Jews for Judaism International.
- Koniuchowsky, Moshe (2007). ""Messianic" Leaders Deny Yeshua in Record Numbers". Retrieved 2007-07-21.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Prasch, James (2007). "You Foolish Galatians, Who Bewitched You? A Crisis in Messianic Judaism?". Retrieved 2007-07-21.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Parsons, John (2007). "Should Christians be Torah-observant?". Retrieved 2007-07-21.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Exarch Aneed, Anthony J. (1919). "Syrian Christians, A Brief History of the Catholic Church of St. George in Milwaukee, Wis. And a Sketch of the Eastern Church". Retrieved 2007-04-28.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Irenaeus of Lyon, Against Heresies V, 1.
- Epiphanius, Panarion 19:28-30
- Epiphanius, Panarion 30.14.5, 30.16.4
- Epiphanius, Panarion 30.16.5
- Epiphanius, Panarion 30.18.7-9
- Epiphanius, Panarion 30.22.4
- ^ Van Voorst, Robert E. (1989). The Ascents of James: History and Theology of a Jewish-Christian Community. Society of Biblical Literature. ISBN 1555402941.
- Géza Vermes (1992). "Brother James' Heirs? the community at Qumran and its relations to the first Christians". Retrieved 2007-07-23.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - ^ James H. Charlesworth, Unique features shared by Essenes and John the Baptist in interpretation of Isaiah 40:3
- ^ James the Just's position as leader of the Jerusalem church after Jesus' death is testified by Clement of Alexandria (quoted by Eusebius in Church History II.1.3-4), Eusebius of Caesarea (Church History II.1.2), and Hegesippus (quoted by Eusebius in Church History II.23.4), and of the wider community beyond Jerusalem by the Gospel of Thomas (saying 12), and Acts 15:19-21
- Epiphanius, Panarion 30.22.4
- ^ Larson, Martin A (1989). The Essene-Christian Faith. Truth Seeker. ISBN 0-939482-16-9.
- Akers, Keith (2000). The Lost Religion of Jesus : Simple Living and Nonviolence in Early Christianity. Lantern Books. 1930051263.
- Murphy, Catherine (2003). John the Baptist - Prophet of Purity for a New Age. Liturgical Press, Collegeville, MN. ISBN 0814659330.
- Charlesworth, James (1992). Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls. Charlesworth, James (ed.), Anchor Bible Reference Library, NY. ISBN 0385478445."Jesus and the Dead Sea Scrolls". Retrieved 2007-08-07.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Price, Randall (Fall 2004). "New Discoveries at Qumran" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-07-26.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Price, Randall (Winter 2005). "Qumran Yields New Secrets - 2005 Dig Report" (PDF). Retrieved 2007-07-26.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help)CS1 maint: year (link) - Stendahl, Kriste (1991). The Scrolls and the New Testament. Herder & Herder. ISBN 0824511360.
- ^ Tabor, James D. (1998). "Ancient Judaism: Nazarenes and Ebionites". Retrieved 2006-09-31.
{{cite journal}}: Check date values in:|accessdate=(help); Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Hippolytus
- The Slavonic Josephus' Account of the Baptist and Jesus
- Epiphanius of Salamis, Panarion, 16, 9.
- ^ "Ebionites". Catholic Encyclopedia. Vol. V. Robert Appleton Company. 1909.
{{cite encyclopedia}}:|access-date=requires|url=(help); External link in|title= - John Toland, Nazarenus, or Jewish, Gentile and Mahometan Christianity, 1718.
- Blackhirst, R. (2000). "Barnabas and the Gospels: Was There an Early Gospel of Barnabas?, J. Higher Criticism, 7/1, pp 1-22". Retrieved 2007-03-11.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - Daniélou, Jean (1964). The theology of Jewish Christianity: The Development of Christian doctrine before the Council of Nicea. H. Regnery Co. ASIN B0007FOFQI.
- Bromling, Brad (1995). "Jesus: Truly God and Truly Human". Retrieved 2007-08-05.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help); Unknown parameter|Publisher=ignored (|publisher=suggested) (help) - Loader, William. "Jesus the Jew". Retrieved 2007-08-05.
{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires|journal=(help) - al-Ashanti, Abdulhaq and Bowes, Abdur-Rahmaan (2005). Before Nicea: The Early Followers of Prophet Jesus. Jamia Media. ISBN 0955109906.
{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
Primary sources
Categories: