Revision as of 00:49, 22 August 2007 editAstroHurricane001 (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers17,054 edits →Hurricane Dean: was?: <:-O← Previous edit | Revision as of 02:17, 22 August 2007 edit undoCoredesat (talk | contribs)22,795 edits →Block evasion: extended to weekNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:] <br />~<font color="blue">]]]</font><sup>(]]])</sup> 00:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | :] <br />~<font color="blue">]]]</font><sup>(]]])</sup> 00:49, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | ||
==Block evasion== | |||
I have reset your block timer because CheckUser has confirmed that you are using an anonymous IP to dodge your block. Please refrain from this behavior or your block will be extended further. --]] 01:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC) | |||
:And now your block is a week. If you continue this activity, your block may become indefinite. --]] 02:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 02:17, 22 August 2007
Archives | |
|
|
Thanks
for noticing that a bunch of links on Canon T90 were dead because www.canonfd.com appears to be down. I've fixed them by repointing the links to the archive.org copies. Much appreciated, Matthew Brown (Morven) (T:C) 22:47, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
Test
Thank you for experimenting with Misplaced Pages. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Pumpernickel pickle (talk • contribs) 11:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Read Talk:Wilhelm Reich. And sign your msgs.--SallyForth123 12:11, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Archiving
Hi, it seems like you deleted a large number of comments by other people, at the Terri Schiavo talk page. If the talk page is too big, then the appropriate response is to archive the older comments. Thanks.Ferrylodge 17:55, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- I archived them in the standard fashion. If they are active, then feel free to move them bring them back on to the active talk page.--SallyForth123 18:03, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
Hurricane Dean: was?
Hi. About "was": saying that something "was" in every instance in every article doesn't really help. It makes it sound like everything that exsists did exist. It makes everything in past tense. If it's about something that currently exists, it should be "is". For example, saying "was" on a bio makes it sound like the person died or was demoted. Saying "was" on a building makes it seem like it collapsed. Similarly, saying "was" on a hurricane makes it sound like it dissapated or it is gone and is now history. I don't see any guideline that says we should always use was in every possible place where we could theoretically use is. If there is such a policy or guideline or essay saying we should not at all be current, feel free to post it. Thanks. ~AH1 23:53, 21 August 2007 (UTC)
- Note also you have carried out 3 reversions. If you continue to carry on doing so you will be in violation of the three-revert rule and may be blocked for edit-warring.--Nilfanion (talk) 00:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Just wondering, if this keeps up, should it be included on Lame Edit Wars? Thanks. ~AH1 00:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Do as you see fit.--SallyForth123 00:23, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- Hi. Just wondering, if this keeps up, should it be included on Lame Edit Wars? Thanks. ~AH1 00:22, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
I've blocked you for 24 hours for violating the three-revert rule on Hurricane Dean. Please refrain from edit warring when your block expires. --Coredesat 00:36, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
Block evasion
I have reset your block timer because CheckUser has confirmed that you are using an anonymous IP to dodge your block. Please refrain from this behavior or your block will be extended further. --Coredesat 01:34, 22 August 2007 (UTC)
- And now your block is a week. If you continue this activity, your block may become indefinite. --Coredesat 02:17, 22 August 2007 (UTC)