Misplaced Pages

Rosalind Picard: Difference between revisions

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 23:58, 26 August 2007 editFilll (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers34,790 edits →Anti-Evolution Petition Controversy: It appears over 500 signatories by my reading of it← Previous edit Revision as of 13:55, 27 August 2007 edit undoMoulton (talk | contribs)897 edits Tags alerting to disputed content.Next edit →
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Blpdispute}}
{{Disputeabout|'''The subject's alleged connection to the ]'''}}
{{Disputed-category}}

'''Rosalind W. Picard''' is director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the ], and co-director of the Things That Think Consortium, the largest industrial sponsorship organization at the lab.<ref></ref> Picard is the author of ''Affective Computing'', published in 1997.<ref></ref> In 2005, she was named a Fellow of the ].<ref></ref> '''Rosalind W. Picard''' is director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the ], and co-director of the Things That Think Consortium, the largest industrial sponsorship organization at the lab.<ref></ref> Picard is the author of ''Affective Computing'', published in 1997.<ref></ref> In 2005, she was named a Fellow of the ].<ref></ref>


Line 10: Line 14:


==Anti-Evolution Petition Controversy== ==Anti-Evolution Petition Controversy==
{{TotallyDisputed-section}}
⚫ In February 2006, the ] reported<ref> , Kenneth Chang, ], February 21, 2006.</ref> that Dr. Picard was one of several hundred professonals who signed the ]'s controversial petition, "]".<ref></ref> This two-sentence petition has been widely exploited by its sponsor, the ], and some of their ] in a national campaign to discredit evolution<ref></ref> and to promote the teaching of ] in public schools. It has it the subject of ] and ].
{{SectOR}}
⚫ In February 2006, the ] reported<ref> , Kenneth Chang, ], February 21, 2006.</ref> that Dr. Picard was one of several hundred professonals who signed{{check}} the ]'s controversial petition,{{check}} "]".<ref></ref> This{{check}} two-sentence petition has been widely exploited by its sponsor{{check}}, the ], and some of their ] in a national campaign to discredit evolution<ref></ref> and to promote the teaching of ] in public schools. It has it the subject of ] and ].


Picard's field of ] is unrelated to ]. Writer ], co-founder of "Michigan Citizens for Science" and the ] website, writes that, "the majority of the people on that list have no training or expertise in evolutionary biology at all. Now that doesn't necessarily mean that they don't know what they're talking about, but it does mean that putting them on a list that is used solely as an ] is ridiculous, since they have no authority in the field."<ref>, ], Pharyngula, Science Blogs, February 19, 2007 9:32 AM</ref> Picard's field of ] is unrelated to ]. Writer ], co-founder of "Michigan Citizens for Science" and the ] website, writes that, "the majority of the people on that list have no training or expertise in evolutionary biology at all. Now that doesn't necessarily mean that they don't know what they're talking about, but it does mean that putting them on a list that is used solely as an ] is ridiculous, since they have no authority in the field."<ref>, ], Pharyngula, Science Blogs, February 19, 2007 9:32 AM</ref>

Revision as of 13:55, 27 August 2007

This article's factual accuracy is disputed. Relevant discussion may be found on the talk page. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The factual accuracy of part of this article is disputed. The dispute is about The subject's alleged connection to the Discovery Institute. Please help to ensure that disputed statements are reliably sourced. See the relevant discussion on the ]. (Learn how and when to remove this message)
The inclusion of one or more of the categories on this page is disputed. Please see the relevant discussion on the talk page.

Rosalind W. Picard is director of the Affective Computing Research Group at the MIT Media Lab, and co-director of the Things That Think Consortium, the largest industrial sponsorship organization at the lab. Picard is the author of Affective Computing, published in 1997. In 2005, she was named a Fellow of the IEEE.

The Affective Computing Research Group develops tools, techniques, and devices for sensing, interpreting, and processing emotion signals that drive state-of-the-art systems which respond intelligently to human emotional states. Applications of their research include improved tutoring systems and assistive technology for use in alleviating Autism.

She holds a bachelor's degree in electrical engineering with highest honors from the Georgia Institute of Technology, and master's and doctorate degrees, both in electrical engineering and computer science, from MIT. She has been a member of the faculty at the MIT Media Laboratory since 1991, with tenure since 1998.

She is recipient (with Tom Minka) of a best paper prize for work on machine learning with multiple models (1998).

Her book, Affective Computing, (MIT Press, 1997) lays the groundwork for giving machines the skills of emotional intelligence.

Anti-Evolution Petition Controversy

Template:TotallyDisputed-section

This section possibly contains original research. Please improve it by verifying the claims made and adding inline citations. Statements consisting only of original research should be removed. (Learn how and when to remove this message)

In February 2006, the New York Times reported that Dr. Picard was one of several hundred professonals who signed the Discovery Institute's controversial petition, "A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism". This two-sentence petition has been widely exploited by its sponsor, the Discovery Institute, and some of their supporters in a national campaign to discredit evolution and to promote the teaching of intelligent design in public schools. It has it the subject of criticism and parody.

Picard's field of computer science is unrelated to evolutionary biology. Writer Ed Brayton, co-founder of "Michigan Citizens for Science" and the The Panda's Thumb website, writes that, "the majority of the people on that list have no training or expertise in evolutionary biology at all. Now that doesn't necessarily mean that they don't know what they're talking about, but it does mean that putting them on a list that is used solely as an appeal to authority is ridiculous, since they have no authority in the field."

References

  1. Media Lab Faculty Biography
  2. Publication of Affective Computing
  3. IEEE Fellows of the Class of 2005
  4. Research Projects of the Affective Computing Research Group
  5. Affective Computing Group Web Page
  6. Current and Past Projects
  7. MIT Faculty Biography Page
  8. Affective Learning Companion
  9. MIT Press Publication of Affective Computing
  10. Few Biologists but Many Evangelicals Sign Anti-Evolution Petition, Kenneth Chang, New York Times, February 21, 2006.
  11. Signatories of 'A Scientific Dissent From Darwinism'
  12. Doubts Over Evolution Mount With Over 300 Scientists Expressing Skepticism With Central Tenet of Darwin's Theory
  13. Neurosurgeon Challenges Evolution, PZ Myers, Pharyngula, Science Blogs, February 19, 2007 9:32 AM

External links

Categories: