| Revision as of 14:01, 20 June 2005 edit205.188.116.132 (talk) 3RR violation← Previous edit | Revision as of 14:02, 20 June 2005 edit undoGabrielsimon (talk | contribs)2,118 edits →3RR violationNext edit → | ||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
| Just noting your contribution to ]...please be careful in the future. Thanks ~ ] 04:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) | Just noting your contribution to ]...please be careful in the future. Thanks ~ ] 04:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC) | ||
| have removed comments from an anon user who is likly not being as frinedly as possible. | |||
| == 3RR violation == | |||
| Please do not delete my comments from a talk page. | |||
| Additionally, I am sure you know this but you violated 3RR on ] - I will not revert but I am sure other editors will because the comments are clearly POV. If you continue to revert I will have no choice but to request a 24-hour block. ] 14:01, 20 Jun 2005 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 14:02, 20 June 2005
Old talk can be found in archive1.
wanna talk to me directly? IM me. otherwise leave comments here. i blanked the page becasue i had the warning that hte page was getting a lottle long. Gabrielsimon 04:21, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- You can always archive old talk (if you care to archive it) by copying the wikitext into a new page like User talk:Gabrielsimon/archive1 or something like that. Subpages are great. — Saxifrage | ☎ 07:57, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
i dont actually know how to do that, but if you want to, feel free. thanks tho!
Gabrielsimon 08:55, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- I clicked through to that link to get an edit page, then went back to the last version of this page before you blanked it and opened the edit page. Then I just copy-n-pasted the old edit text into the new "archive1" page. I finished by adding a link to this page so it can be easily found. — Saxifrage | ☎ 18:17, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
thanks!
Gabrielsimon 18:30, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Joseph Smith, Jr.
I did not revert your edit, only moved it to the talk page for discussion. This article is very long and is often expanded quite casually. Many of the issues these editors bring up have been discussed and resolved on the talk page, and then information has been added to the article. Your edit seems to be on a unique subject and would probably benefit from discussion. I myself have a number of questions about your statement, and would like to see you expand and clarify your opinion. I believe others who frequent the page will have questions too. Citing sources and weeding out simple opinion on a religious subject is important in maintaining NPOV, as per Misplaced Pages protocol. So, thank you for your interest in Joseph Smith, and please feel free to use the talk page. Peace. WBardwin 00:05, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Quasi-vandalism
Just noting your contribution to Mormon...please be careful in the future. Thanks ~ Dpr 04:54, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
have removed comments from an anon user who is likly not being as frinedly as possible.