| Revision as of 19:02, 1 September 2007 editBmedley Sutler (talk | contribs)1,259 edits →:^(← Previous edit | Revision as of 19:06, 1 September 2007 edit undoBmedley Sutler (talk | contribs)1,259 edits Leave my page alone trolls, administrator thatcher131 said it was okayNext edit → | ||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
| -------------- | -------------- | ||
| ] | |||
| ], ], ]<BR><I><B>'I'm just a hunk, a hunk of burnin' love'</B></I>]] | ] ] ], ], ]<BR><I><B>'I'm just a hunk, a hunk of burnin' love'</B></I>]] | ||
Revision as of 19:06, 1 September 2007
 Archives |
- Hello and welcome to my talk page!
(please post below)
]
'I'm just a hunk, a hunk of burnin' love'
Hello Brad, I guess you took away my page because I put too much of the song? It wasnt the whole thing! Please let me know. Thanks •smedleyΔbutler• 05:46, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Full protection
I've fully protected this page for the duration of this user's block period for continued disruption during block.--Jersey Devil 14:23, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
Block and protection
I am returning your block to the original one week duration. I reblocked you for a longer period because I made a mistake in looking at the history of your talk page and thought you had put the copyrighted song lyrics up again after they were removed. I have also restored the last version of your talk page and lifted the protection. Your photos of a bathroom and a Senator seem to fall within the scope of what users are allowed to put on their user and talk page. See for example this current discussion and also see what userspace is not. Certainly it would be a problem if you were making possibly libelous insinuations about a private person, or about a public person based on rumors or partisan sites, but that is not the case here, and poking a little fun seems to be within the latitude allowed. Thatcher131 00:25, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
- Thank you! •smedleyΔbutler• 04:27, 31 August 2007 (UTC)
User:Thatcher131, I am glad to see that you did not use the passive voice, and that you admitted that you “made a mistake.” And yet, I searched your statement three times in vain for phrases such as, “I’m sorry,” “I apologize,” “Would you please accept my apology?” and “Yours with deepest regret and contrition.”
‘Bout time you cowboyed up, eh, pardner? 71.249.54.58 05:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
:^(
It is clear that you want to make a positive contribution but you are letting your knee-jerk desire to make smart-ass remarks interfere with the quality of your edits, draw attention to yourself, and give those who disagree ammunition against you. Please knock off the personal attacks and baiting. You can catch more flies with honey than vinegar. ←Ben 08:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Don't Pablo Talk | Contributions 08:48, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hm. Is this proven or speculation? ←Ben 08:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's Pablo Talk | Contributions 08:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- I looked into it. While possible, I think such accusations should be confined to WP:SSP until a checkuser can be run. ←Ben 09:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- . - Crockspot 13:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Pablo, NPA, calling someone another user is an attack. NPA1 You people have to get your stories together for your sockpuppet charges. I am supposed to be Seven of Diamonds! Your track record is 0 of 6? Not so good. The group is looking like conspircay theories. Thank you for the advice Ben. Why do RW like Morton Devoshire and Mongo get to make smart-ass comments but not leftists? •smedleyΔbutler• 19:02, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- . - Crockspot 13:04, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- I looked into it. While possible, I think such accusations should be confined to WP:SSP until a checkuser can be run. ←Ben 09:41, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- It's Pablo Talk | Contributions 08:57, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hm. Is this proven or speculation? ←Ben 08:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)