| Revision as of 19:11, 2 September 2007 editFresh Prince Carlton (talk | contribs)939 edits Hi Big Daddy M← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:32, 2 September 2007 edit undoBIG Daddy M (talk | contribs)91 edits deleting harrassing commentsNext edit → | ||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
| ::::The fact that I keep moving them here and responding here shows you that I'm serious about the blurb on my talk page that says "If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page. If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will watch it for your response, so please reply there." And please, remain ]. ] 15:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | ::::The fact that I keep moving them here and responding here shows you that I'm serious about the blurb on my talk page that says "If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page. If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will watch it for your response, so please reply there." And please, remain ]. ] 15:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
| == Hi Big Daddy M == | |||
| Why are you talking to me like that. I did not delete your message and when Anormalwwefan told yopu to read the top it meant do what it said at the top. Maybe your to retarded to understand. I'll tell you how to do it, Add the word, editprotected with {{}} around it to the top of your post and then state your source and reason why. The sources that are allowable are at the top of the page. And that language is not needed so watch what you say please. ] 19:11, 2 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 21:32, 2 September 2007
Superboy-Prime
Use the articles talk page to explain why you feel the addition of these two quotes are relevant and important to the article. There are at least two of us who disagree with you. Content disputes ARE NOT VANDALISM, so stop using that word. Oh, and..
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. Pairadox 18:50, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- It is vandalism. You are both in the wrong here. You are deleting sourced information relevant to the story. That is vandalism. Look it up.BIG Daddy M 19:37, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- Vandalism is any addition, removal, or change of content made in a deliberate attempt to compromise the integrity of Misplaced Pages. Any good-faith effort to improve the encyclopedia, even if misguided or ill-considered, is not vandalism. Pairadox 20:39, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
- The fact that you keep deleting my messages show me that you know that im right and your wrong. I hope this is the end of this crap.BIG Daddy M 15:36, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- The fact that I keep moving them here and responding here shows you that I'm serious about the blurb on my talk page that says "If you post a message on this page, I'll reply on this page. If I've left you a message on your talk page, I will watch it for your response, so please reply there." And please, remain civil. Pairadox 15:43, 2 September 2007 (UTC)