Revision as of 21:49, 12 September 2007 editIrpen (talk | contribs)32,604 edits re← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:53, 12 September 2007 edit undoGolbez (talk | contribs)Administrators66,913 edits →3RRNext edit → | ||
Line 222: | Line 222: | ||
How by who and why was that "noted" over IRC while ANI is right there? --] 21:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | How by who and why was that "noted" over IRC while ANI is right there? --] 21:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
:OK, now I understand what happened. I can figure who known to be on IRC was there and went block-shopping. Sneaky and dirty! --] 21:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | :OK, now I understand what happened. I can figure who known to be on IRC was there and went block-shopping. Sneaky and dirty! --] 21:49, 12 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
::You continue to misrepresent me. No one went block shopping. My discussion with you on this matter is over. (By the way, it HAD been noted on ANI, before Ghirla deleted it, he says in an edit conflict) --] 21:53, 12 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:53, 12 September 2007
ARCHIVES:
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Winter 2005
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Summer 2005
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Autumn 2005
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Christmas 2005
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Winter 2006
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Spring 2006
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Summer 2006
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Autumn 2006
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Winter 2007
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Spring 2007
- User talk:Ghirlandajo/Summer 2007
DYK - Henry Hunt (politician)
An ideal team!Andrey, I am always amazed and delighted by the periodic DYKs that appear on my talk page, largely thanks to the work you do on the raw material I provide on the Humanities Desk. We make an ideal partnership, a little like Marx and Engels, or Laurel and Hardie! All the very best from Anastasia. Clio the Muse 22:39, 30 August 2007 (UTC) Another DYK
DYK
Thanks, for the nth time, for your nominations. Daniel 06:41, 31 August 2007 (UTC) SkhimarMade some additions based on Brook and an article by Ehud Ya'ari. They both call the site "Khumar". Should we rename the article "Khumarinskoye gorodishche" or "Khumar", as Skhimar seems a rather obscure Georgian designation? --Briangotts (Talk) (Contrib) 03:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Courtier and Favourite- are both just dic defs. I've left pleas in a couple of places, & can chip in myself, but I'm sure you could make a great job of them. Any chance? Johnbod 19:15, 1 September 2007 (UTC)
Iranian countiesSorry for the late reply. I have been very busy lately. I will address the issue when I have time (hopefully tonight).Hajji Piruz 23:59, 1 September 2007 (UTC) Storm pageHowdy partner, liked your storm page Meteoguy 18:26, 4 September 2007 (UTC) DYK
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/RyeDid you know...
GA EmpiresWould anyone like to comment on this? --Joopercoopers 11:03, 6 September 2007 (UTC) Why there is an Uspensky/Uspenski Cathedral in HelsinkiHi Girlandajo! You wrote on the talk page of the article on Uspenski Cathedral in Helsinki that: "There is no explanantion why a church in Helsinki should occupy this generic title". There definitely is an explanation: Finland and Russia happen to have a common history 1809-1917. Kindly read my comment on this on the talk page of the article. By the way, your analysis about Misplaced Pages on your user page is thoughtprovoking! Cheers! --Tellervo 11:45, 6 September 2007 (UTC) Mongol questionGhirla, hi, I'm needing the help of a Misplaced Pages editor who actually knows something about the Mongols (in particular about their activities in the late 1200s). Preferably someone who actually has access to reliable sources, as opposed to someone who's just doing Google searches through pseudohistory websites. :/ Would you be a good person to help with this, or could you point me at someone else that might be able to help? Thanks, Elonka 19:47, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
Dardanelles OperationHi, do we need two articles on the same topic Battle of the Dardanelles (1807)? I notice you haved edited at them both. Chessy999 00:40, 7 September 2007 (UTC) DYKHi, just to let you know that I protested against the by-passing of the nomination process here regarding the Kazanowski Palace. --Camptown 20:47, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
Paintings depicting battle, death and war (new articles)Hi there. I saw your suggestions at the Reference Desk thread. Do you know of anyone (maybe you?) who would be able to draw up a more complete list of the most famous "battle" and "war" paintings that we should have articles on? commons:Category:Battle paintings might help. The list so far is: Any more ideas? Carcharoth 08:04, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Did you know...
Misplaced Pages:Featured picture candidates/Ivan the TerribleFranco-Mongol allianceHi Ghirlandajo! Thank you very much for the star! I do appreciate very much! Best regards PHG 15:16, 11 September 2007 (UTC) Did you know...
Weather infoboxI think the general idea is good (temperature information is encyclopedic and useful), but I, too, don't care much about this particular implementation. Peacock colors aside, the template is so wide (regardless of whether it is hidden by default) that it would more often than not clash with infoboxes and images. In Irkutsk in particular, there is no way to fix this situation unless the "Geography and climate" section is expanded (more than twice) or moved down (which isn't desirable either), or if the infobox is removed. I don't really know if there is a good solution.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 16:01, 12 September 2007 (UTC) 3RRNormally, people get warnings when violating 3RR, but since move-wars are probably the most annoying wars to clean up, you aren't getting that courtesy.
In the future, also, please do not completely retask an active page without clear consensus. You are being blocked for 24 hours. --Golbez 21:19, 12 September 2007 (UTC) This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).Ghirlandajo (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log)) Request reason: This is absolutely outrageous. I am told the block was prompted on IRC to prevent me from commenting on WP:ANI. "Reverts ##1-2" and "Reverts ##2-3" have nothing in common and are different by nature. --Ghirla-трёп- 21:26, 12 September 2007 (UTC) Decline reason: Please reread WP:3RR. Reverts do not need to be to the same content. — Yamla 21:28, 12 September 2007 (UTC) If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
How by who and why was that "noted" over IRC while ANI is right there? --Irpen 21:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)
|