Misplaced Pages

:Requests for adminship/Susvolans: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Requests for adminship Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 12:19, 26 June 2005 editDmn (talk | contribs)5,898 editsNo edit summary← Previous edit Revision as of 13:07, 26 June 2005 edit undoNetoholic (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users39,916 edits →[]Next edit →
Line 12: Line 12:
'''Oppose''' '''Oppose'''
# No way. -- ] ] 19:35, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC) # No way. -- ] ] 19:35, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
⚫ #:Any particular reason? ] | ] 19:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
⚫ #::I've seen your comment. Voters should not be challenged. I have at this time not given detailed reasons. No amount of prodding will change that. You'll get a better explanaion when I see fit. -- ] ] 22:25, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
⚫ #:::FYI, Neto told me he would explain when Sus answered the standard questions. HTH. ]]] 23:25, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
⚫ #::::Thanks. That's pretty reasonable and all I wanted to know for now. ] | ] 23:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
# ]] 19:55, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC) # ]] 19:55, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
#'''Oppose'''. I can't support someone who's for admin. --] 20:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC) #'''Oppose'''. I can't support someone who's for admin. --] 20:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Line 29: Line 25:
#Are you the same one who called me a vandal? If I'm mistaken I apologize. It was either you or someone with a similar name. ] 00:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC) #Are you the same one who called me a vandal? If I'm mistaken I apologize. It was either you or someone with a similar name. ] 00:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
#'''Abstain''' until the questions are finished. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 21:54, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC) #'''Abstain''' until the questions are finished. ]<sup>] ]</sup> 21:54, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

'''Comments''' '''Comments'''
⚫ #(to Netoholic) Any particular reason? ] | ] 19:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
⚫ #:I've seen your comment. Voters should not be challenged. I have at this time not given detailed reasons. No amount of prodding will change that. You'll get a better explanaion when I see fit. -- ] ] 22:25, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
⚫ #::FYI, Neto told me he would explain when Sus answered the standard questions. HTH. ]]] 23:25, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
⚫ #:::Thanks. That's pretty reasonable and all I wanted to know for now. ] | ] 23:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
#:: Good to know private conversations are, private. -- ] ] 13:07, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)


'''Questions for the candidate'''<br /> '''Questions for the candidate'''<br />

Revision as of 13:07, 26 June 2005

Susvolans

Vote here (1/5/6) ending 18:54 1 July 2005 (UTC)

Susvolans is doing tireless work on stub sorting and vandalism patrol, and has over 6000 edits under the belt. A steadfast contributor who can be trusted to use adminity to further the wiki. Radiant_>|< 18:55, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)

Candidate, please indicate acceptance of the nomination here:

Support

  1. Sarge Baldy 19:03, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
  2. 'Support' - There's always plenty of room at the Hotel RC Patrol. --FCYTravis 19:11, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Oppose

  1. No way. -- Netoholic @ 19:35, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
  2. Instantnood 19:55, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
  3. Oppose. I can't support someone who's used their sig for panic-mongering for admin. --Carnildo 20:04, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  4. Oppose per Carnildo gkhan 11:26, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)
  5. Oppose 172 01:35, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  6. Oppose I too dislike the panic-mongering Dmn / Դմն 12:19, 26 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Neutral

  1. I want to Support, as I like Suslovans, but I don't see stub sorting as a reason to give someone an admin. Sure, it's necessary gruntwork that needs a reward, but I keep seeing it as a reason to make someone an admin. For what other reasons should I vote for Suslovans? I'm sure I'll eventually move to support but spell out why I should, please. SchmuckyTheCat 19:34, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  2. Neutral until the editor answers the standard questions. --Sn0wflake 20:31, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  3. Neutral - per Sn0wflake. --FCYTravis 21:18, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  4. Ditto. Would like to support, but the answers need answering... Grutness...wha? 23:32, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  5. Are you the same one who called me a vandal? If I'm mistaken I apologize. It was either you or someone with a similar name. Everyking 00:24, 25 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  6. Abstain until the questions are finished. Bratsche 21:54, Jun 25, 2005 (UTC)

Comments

  1. (to Netoholic) Any particular reason? Carbonite | Talk 19:40, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    I've seen your comment. Voters should not be challenged. I have at this time not given detailed reasons. No amount of prodding will change that. You'll get a better explanaion when I see fit. -- Netoholic @ 22:25, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)
    FYI, Neto told me he would explain when Sus answered the standard questions. HTH. Radiant_>|< 23:25, Jun 24, 2005 (UTC)
    Thanks. That's pretty reasonable and all I wanted to know for now. Carbonite | Talk 23:27, 24 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    Good to know private conversations are, private. -- Netoholic @ 13:07, 2005 Jun 26 (UTC)

Questions for the candidate
A few generic questions to provide guidance for voters:

1. What sysop chores, if any, would you anticipate helping with? (Please read the page about administrators and the administrators' reading list.)
A.
2. Of your articles or contributions to Misplaced Pages, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
A.
3. Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
A.