Revision as of 00:29, 25 September 2007 view sourceO (talk | contribs)Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers11,413 edits Requesting full protection of Highway 6_(Ontario).← Previous edit | Revision as of 00:33, 25 September 2007 view source Neier (talk | contribs)38,738 edits →Current requests for protectionNext edit → | ||
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Current requests for protection== | ==Current requests for protection== | ||
{{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}} | {{Misplaced Pages:Requests for page protection/PRheading}} | ||
===={{la|Nights into Dreams...}}==== | |||
'''semi-protect''' as similar to the request below. ] 00:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
===={{la|Nights: Journey of Dreams}}==== | |||
'''semi-protect'''. Large number of IP edits altering content to match the game maker's stylistic capitalization in the article, against ]. The game is in the news lately, as it has had a release date announced. Various IP's have also vandalized ] regarding his attempts to keep the page adhering to our style guidelines. ] 00:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC) | |||
==== {{la|Highway 6 (Ontario)}} ==== | ==== {{la|Highway 6 (Ontario)}} ==== | ||
'''full protection''' '''+expiry 1 week''', Full protection: Dispute, Apparent edit warring over infobox..<span style="font-family: Segoe UI, Trebuchet MS, Arial;">''']''' (] • ])</span> 00:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC) | '''full protection''' '''+expiry 1 week''', Full protection: Dispute, Apparent edit warring over infobox..<span style="font-family: Segoe UI, Trebuchet MS, Arial;">''']''' (] • ])</span> 00:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:33, 25 September 2007
Noticeboards | |
---|---|
Misplaced Pages's centralized discussion, request, and help venues. For a listing of ongoing discussions and current requests, see the dashboard. For a related set of forums which do not function as noticeboards see formal review processes. | |
General | |
Articles and content | |
Page handling | |
User conduct | |
Other | |
Category:Misplaced Pages noticeboards |
Welcome—request protection of a page, file, or template here. | ||
---|---|---|
Shortcuts
Before requesting, read the protection policy. Full protection is used to stop edit warring between multiple users or to prevent vandalism to high-risk templates; semi-protection and pending changes are usually used to prevent IP and new user vandalism (see the rough guide to semi-protection); and move protection is used to stop pagemove revert wars. Extended confirmed protection is used where semi-protection has proved insufficient (see the rough guide to extended confirmed protection) After a page has been protected, it is listed in the page history and logs with a short rationale, and the article is listed on Special:Protectedpages. In the case of full protection due to edit warring, admins should not revert to specific versions of the page, except to get rid of obvious vandalism.
Request unprotection of a page, or reducing the protection level Request unprotection Request a specific edit to a protected page Please request an edit directly on the protected page's talk page before posting here Request edit |
Archives |
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 |
Current requests for protection
Place requests for new or upgrading of article protection, upload protection, or create protection at the BOTTOM of this section. Check the archive of fulfilled and denied requests or, failing that, the page history if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
Nights into Dreams... (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect as similar to the request below. Neier 00:33, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Nights: Journey of Dreams (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. Large number of IP edits altering content to match the game maker's stylistic capitalization in the article, against WP:MOSCAPS. The game is in the news lately, as it has had a release date announced. Various IP's have also vandalized User:Cyrus XIII regarding his attempts to keep the page adhering to our style guidelines. Neier 00:31, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Highway 6 (Ontario) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full protection +expiry 1 week, Full protection: Dispute, Apparent edit warring over infobox..O (说 • 喝) 00:29, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Stock (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of IP vandalism for the past month and increasing recently. Pocopocopocopoco 00:11, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined - though the vandalism has been somewhat building up since August there doesn't seem enough rampant vandalism to justify protection at this time. Watchlist it for now.¤~Persian Poet Gal 00:18, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
FIFA 08 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi protection +expiry 2 weeks, semi protection: Vandalism, Persistent vandalism by IP's since unprotection on 21:35 UTC, 23rd September (about 24 hours ago). .NASCAR Fan24 23:23, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 3 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. Fvasconcellos (t·c) 23:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Johnsburg High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect vandalism from IPs and new accounts Rat at WikiFur 22:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - badly vandalised. Reverted to known good version - Alison 22:20, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Preteen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. I reverted 3 times a vandal's edit to this page and I feel that he'll keep making this edit. Georgia guy 22:12, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected That's not vandalism, it's an edit war. Neither 8 years nor 10 years is referenced, so I suggest you work that out with Mr. Comedian. · AndonicO 22:24, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Bonnie Tyler (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. Continuing level of anonymous IP vandalism and reverting. Kookoo Star 20:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected - Edit war. Work it out on the talk page. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 21:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Llanishen High School (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. Recent spate of multiple vandalism by just -registered users…appears to be school kids goofing off with one another. DMacks 19:03, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. Alison 19:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect - lots of IP vandalism in recent days, controversial topic, vandalism likely to continue. Candidate for long-term protection? Bencherlite 18:35, 24 September 2007 (UTC) (reposting, as this was accidentally deleted by a subsequent request) Bencherlite 19:02, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. WjBscribe 19:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Red hair (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection - vandalism is starting to get to silly proportions again and article needs a break - Alison 18:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC) (edits there)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 month, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. WjBscribe 19:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
User:Majorly (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Full-Protection - Since this user chose to leave Misplaced Pages, it would be respectful to protect his page from potential vandals. Icestorm815 18:53, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected - Majorly is gone?? No way .... :( Alison 18:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
William Wordsworth (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection Semi-protection: Vandalism, LOts of recent vandlaism by several ips.Hammer1980· 18:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. - school's back again, I see - Alison 19:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- User(s) blocked. - blocked one or two of the more blatant ones - Alison 19:00, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Heaven_nightclub (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
- semi-protect - repeated reversion by an unsourced person.-pepsibot 18:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined - ? sockpuppetry is going on, but I don't see a need for semiprotection right now. Requester has already been username-blocked by another admin. MastCell 20:37, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Edward DeVries (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect - repeated reversion by various anon IPs to unsourced/OR version despite warnings left by various users. -choster 18:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined. Seems to be a content dispute. Protection policy does not allow for semi-protection where it will have the effect of locking out one side of the dispute. WjBscribe 19:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Manchester Airport (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection - multiple anon IP vandal edits. Onnaghar 18:32, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. MastCell 20:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Halloween (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 2 weeks, Semi-protection: Vandalism, Chronic IP vandalism over several days from various sources. Vandal magnet. The article may need a longer period of protection (or further protection later) as 31st October approaches... 2 weeks is just a suggestion (since TW forces the choice of a time period) Bencherlite 18:17, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 2 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.. WjBscribe 19:56, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Film (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Indefinite semi-protect. High target article; has been granted indef semi at least two times before, only to be unprotected without any discussion by random otherwise non-involved admins, much to my chagrin. My last request several weeks ago was met with a temporary two week semi, and sure as I predicted, the vandals returned almost instantly once this expired. Today there have been five (IIRC) just this morning. The article has undergone nearly no major edits in over a year by either users or IPs. Girolamo Savonarola 17:55, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Killian documents (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of reverts and conflicts from new and/or rotating IP addresses. Callmebc 15:31, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Fully protected You are editwarring, please take it to the talk page. -- John Reaves 15:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
CallmeBC does not wish to have edits besides his/her included. The editor clearly has a strong opinion on the subject as seen at his site aheckova.com but is not willing to compromise and has been blocked for short periods before because of intemperate edit summaries. This is just a desire from the requestor to "win" as they have already mentioned in their edit summaries. 68.242.64.112 15:46, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
What part of "High level of reverts and conflicts from new and/or rotating IP addresses." was not understood? Will someone check on the "contribs" of 68.242.64.112 -- it's a shortlived sockpuppet IP, one of many I've had to deal with over the past few days: zero (or irrelevant) discussions on the Talk page and chronic reverts of any attempt to fix problems with the main article. Please deal with this problem more appropriately. -BC aka Callmebc 15:54, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Now now, don't be a jerk. You and the IP are edit warring, plain and simple. It would unfair to only lock out the IP when you are just as gulity. -- John Reaves 18:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Current requests for unprotection
ShortcutsBefore posting, first discuss with the protecting admin on their talk page. Post below only if you receive no reply.
- To find out the username of the admin who protected the page, click on "history" at the top of the page, then click on "View logs for this page," which is under the title of the page. The protecting admin is the username in blue before the words "protected", "changed protection level" or "pending changes". If there are a number of entries on the log page, you might find it easier to select "Protection log" or "Pending changes log" from the dropdown menu in the blue box.
- Requests to downgrade full protection to template protection on templates and modules can be directed straight here; you do not need to ask the protecting admin first.
- Requests for removing create protection on redlinked articles are generally assisted by having a draft version of the intended article prepared beforehand.
- If you want to make spelling corrections or add uncontroversial information to a protected page, please add {{Edit fully-protected}} to the article's talk page, along with an explanation of what you want to add to the page. If the talk page is protected, please use the section below.
Check the archives if you cannot find your request. Only recently answered requests are still listed here.
User:195.188.50.200 (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Unprotect Block has expired a long time ago: and the page should be unprotected. --HurricanVest 09:30, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unprotected -- John Reaves 15:41, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Current requests for significant edits to a protected page
ShortcutIdeally, requests should be made on the article talk page rather than here.
- Unless the talk page itself is protected, you may instead add the appropriate template among
{{Edit protected}}
,{{Edit template-protected}}
,{{Edit extended-protected}}
, or{{Edit semi-protected}}
to the article's talk page if you would like to make a change rather than requesting it here. Doing so will automatically place the page in the appropriate category for the request to be reviewed. - Where requests are made due to the editor having a conflict of interest (COI; see Misplaced Pages:Suggestions for COI compliance), the
{{Edit COI}}
template should be used. - Requests to move move-protected pages should be made at Misplaced Pages:Requested moves, not here.
- If the discussion page and the article are both protected preventing you from making an edit request, this page is the right place to make that request. Please see the top of this page for instructions on how to post requests.
- This page is not for continuing or starting discussions regarding content should both an article and its discussion page be protected. Please make a request only if you have a specific edit you wish to make.
User talk:Punk Boi 8 (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
At User talk:Punk Boi 8#Block Appeal, there's a link to an archived WP:ANI discussion - the current location of the discussion is: ]. I would like an admin to fix that - since it seems that the WP:ANI discussion is necessary to understand this section. Od Mishehu 15:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Hkelkar (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
At User talk:Hkelkar#No Personal Attacks, there's a link to an archived WP:ANI discussion - the current location of the discussion is: ]. I would like an admin to fix that - since it seems that the WP:ANI discussion is necessary to understand this section. Od Mishehu 15:58, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:TareTone (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
At User talk:TareTone#Problematic edits, there's a link to an archived WP:ANI discussion - the current location of the discussion is: ]. I would like an admin to fix that - since it seems that the WP:ANI discussion is necessary to understand this section. Od Mishehu 23:01, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Xihix (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
Need to revert a vandalism...
Giggity Giggity GOO! 04:26, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Already done. - Penwhale | 04:52, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Fulfilled/denied requests
Ayatullah Muhammad Hussain Najafi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. High level of reverts and conflicts from new and/or rotating IP addresses. Syed Fayyaz Abbas 17:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined - 2 incidences of vandalism in the past few days isn't quite enough to warrant semi-protection, but if it continues to escalate, drop me a line or come back here and we can semi-protect it. MastCell 17:43, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Athens (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
full protection Full protection: Dispute, 85.74.xx.xx and El Greco are warring over the content of this article, and as far as I can tell, the anon refuses to engage in discussion. Neither are really violating the 3RR rule, but this has been going on for a while, and I think the page should be protected until this is resolved..Gscshoyru 16:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Already protected. by another admin. MastCell 17:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
African Wild Ass (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi protection Semi protection, 10 days: Ceaseless vandalism.The Evil Spartan 16:49, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 1 week, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. — madman bum and angel 16:50, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Île-de-France (region) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Article has been protected for more than a few months now. THEPROMENADER 15:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Unprotected by John Reaves (talk · contribs). — madman bum and angel 16:47, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Template:Vanessa Anne Hudgens (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
Article has been protected for more than a few months now adn some information on her life is missing. THEPROMENADER 15:28, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined — madman bum and angel 16:45, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
File:Acbox.jpg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)
full protection +expiry 1 month, Full protection: Vandalism, Vandalism from IPs; no reason for anons to edit this page..The Evil Spartan 14:51, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- John Reaves 15:48, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
České Budějovice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protect. Continual unsourced and unreferenced reverting from IP address. --Pooh-winnie 14:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. -- John Reaves 15:44, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- He or she did it again recently.--Pooh-winnie 15:59, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Hurricane Bob (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect. Over the past month, this article has recently become a big stop for vandals to randomly mess around with. Smashville 15:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected - For 1 week. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 15:09, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Mouse (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
semi-protection +expiry 2 weeks, Semi-protection: Vandalism, High level of vandalism or reverts..Carlosguitar 14:27, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected - For 2 weeks. --Тhε Rαnδom Eδιτor 15:07, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Mexican-American War (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect - One apparent user using multiple IP address cover to edit war about the article's name. BusterD 21:32, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 18 days, after which the page will be automatically unprotected.--JForget 22:30, 23 September 2007 (UTC)
Elvis Presley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect - Article seems a favorite stopping ground of anonymous IP's who like to vandalize - and it's particulary hard to monitor legitimate edits from vandals with all the activity. Semi-Protection before worked well for this. --Northmeister 12:14, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
HTC Wizard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect - original research and random vandalization is occurring frequently on this page by anonymous user(s). The main anonymous user claims refuses to discuss any such changes, claims that the consensus of registered users' decision on an article is "vandalization". Brianreading 09:58, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined, There is not enough recent activity. Recommend monitoring for now. Regards, Navou 13:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Community Educational Television (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
'Semi-protect as with Houston television articles Related to Mmbabies' constant Houston TV vandalism. Nate 05:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Navou 13:01, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
User talk:Mrschimpf (edit | user page | history | links | watch | logs)
'Semi-protect Banned user User:Mmbabies is targeting my talk page with nonsense questions about PSAs (see WP:LTA/MMB) via his IP socks, and has hit me three times since Wednesday night. Nate 05:11, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Declined – Not enough recent disruptive activity to justify protection. Navou 13:04, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
Animal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Semi-protect Seems to be vandalized day after day, and nobody seems to be watching it. Recently fixed major deletion that didn't get reverted properly. Richard001 08:16, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Semi-protected for a period of 4 weeks, after which the page will be automatically unprotected. --DarkFalls 08:19, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- You have irked me enough DF! Blocked! Banned! Now I own RFPP! :P -- Anonymous Dissident 08:21, 24 September 2007 (UTC)