User talk:Molobo: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively ← Previous edit Next edit →Content deleted Content addedVisual WikitextInline

Revision as of 23:39, 12 September 2007 view sourceSciurinæ (talk \| contribs)Autopatrolled, Rollbackers12,786 edits →Baiting and pov-pushing: report← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:11, 30 September 2007 view source 83.27.95.253 (talk) reduced pageNext edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''Please post your comments, questions and remarks in Other Users Comments
	'''section'''.'''



	==German related Issuess==
	=== IPN investigation confirms that Germans made soap out of humans in WW2 ===

	''IPN: To nie był wymysł komunistycznej propagandy. Niemiecki uczony wytwarzał w Gdańsku mydło z ludzkich zwłok''
	IPN:This wasn't a product of communist propaganda. German scientist made soap out of human corpses in Gdańsk.

	--] 10:22, 28 October 2006 (UTC)


	=== Hatefull attack against Polish people in Die Welt condemned by Polish media and German commission ===


	--] 13:07, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


	=== Washington Post about prejudice towards Polish people in Germany ===


	''"Washington Post" powołuje się na badania dla Instytutu Spraw Publicznych (ISP), z których wynika, że dwie trzecie Niemców nigdy nie było w Polsce, a z naszym krajem kojarzą się im najczęściej "kradzież samochodów i przestępczość"
	''
	Washington Post recalls research for ISP, which concluded that 2/3 of Germans never visited Poland, and associate Poland with "stealing cars and criminality".
	--] 11:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

	=== General Gunzel ===


	''The commander of a German special forces army unit was dismissed Tuesday after he praised a conservative member of Parliament for a speech that has been widely criticized here as anti-Semitic. . . . Mr. Hohmann called Jews 'a race of perpetrators.' The Jews, he said, were prominent in the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917, during which millions were killed. . . . On Monday night, German television reported that General Gunzel had written a letter to Mr. Hohmann in which he expressed agreement with his opinions. . . . 'It was an excellent speech of a courage, truth and clarity that one seldom hears or reads in our country,' General Gunzel's letter said. 'And even if all those who agree with me or even clearly articulate this opinion will be referred to as right-wing extremists by the media, I can assure you that the majority of our people share your thoughts.'"
	The New York Times, November 5, 2003''
	--] 11:27, 2 November 2006 (UTC)

	=== German special forces seen using symbols of Wehrmacht in Afganistan ===

	--] 11:51, 2 November 2006 (UTC)


	===Attitude to migration from Eastern Europe===

	60% of Germans oppose immigration from Eastern European countries

	===Kopernik===

	--] 00:04, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Brest Litovsk===

	--] 11:34, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

	===German ideology of Ethnic Cleansing 1920-1945===

	--] 11:44, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Ludendorff, Wilhelm, plans of ethnic cleansing and annexations towards Poland in WWI===






	--] 15:55, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Lublin to become German===

	--] 00:02, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Attempts to create the myth of "Good German"===

	--] 00:05, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Subhuman Poles===

	--] 00:11, 19 May 2006 (UTC)
	:''Polish Jews'', not ''Poles''. I do hope that was not an intentional misquoting attempting to show the German attitude towards Poles in the worst way possible, but just a misunderstanding. ] ] 02:17, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Warning that German towns could become death traps for foreign tourists in "Brown East" of Germany===

	Uwe-Karsten Heye warns Africans that they could lost their lives if they visit certain places in Germany.
	--] 12:16, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


	''"There are small and mid-sized towns in Brandenburg and elsewhere where I would advise anyone with a different skin colour not to go," said Heye, who now runs an anti-racist action group called Gesicht zeigen (Show Your Face).''
	--] 12:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)


	''"Es gibt kleine und mittlere Städte in Brandenburg und anderswo, wo ich keinem, der eine andere Hautfarbe hat, raten würde hinzugehen. Er würde sie möglicherweise lebend nicht mehr verlassen." Später relativierte Heye seine Äußerungen. DW''
	--] 12:22, 19 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Neonazism in Germany on the rise===

	--] 10:21, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Discrimination of Poles in Prussia===

	--] 18:17, 21 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Poznan===

	--] 00:48, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

	--] 00:55, 24 May 2006 (UTC)


	--] 00:56, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Interesting WW1===

	--] 00:59, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Germand demanded border===

	--] 01:10, 24 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Attacks on foreigners intesify in Germany===


	--] 13:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Polish workers discriminated in Germany by German workers===
	Polish worker was insulted and discriminated in Germany. German co-workers have engaged in insults like "Under Hitler you wouldn't be allowed to work here", "you aren't a nation, you are to be expelled or ruled over" etc.

	--] 13:49, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

	===Selbstschutz in Romania===
	The Escalation of German-Rumanian Anti-Jewish Policy
	after the Attack on the Soviet Union, June 22, 1941

	--] 16:45, 4 June 2006 (UTC)



	=== Expulsion of Poles and Jews proposed by German ideologist in pre-world war I time ===


	Expulsion of all Poles and Jews proposed by German ideologist in pre-world war I time. Later was turned into Lebensraum ideology.
	--] 00:34, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


	===Links===



	--] 00:22, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

	--] 00:25, 13 June 2006 (UTC)


	--] 00:26, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

	--] 00:28, 13 June 2006 (UTC)

	===Independence===

	--] 01:22, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

	=== Hitler's plans to annex western Poland formed in 1933 ===


	--] 00:22, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


	=== Germans elect neonazis into Mecklenburgia parlament ===


	It is the second local parliament in Germany that neonazis have managaged to get representation into. The first was Saxony.
	--] 02:24, 18 September 2006 (UTC)




	--] 02:27, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


	=== And in Berlin local city councils. ===


	And in Berlin local city councils.
	--] 02:29, 18 September 2006 (UTC)


	=== Szymon Datner, German occupation of Poland ===


	--] 01:52, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

	=== Mass murders by Wehrmacht ===

	Mass murders by Wehrmacht

	--] 01:58, 5 October 2006 (UTC)




	==Russia related issuess==

	===Only 29 %===
	Russians agree with the current borders of Russia
	--] 00:53, 22 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Putin returns to traditions of Imperial Russia===


	--] 11:32, 23 May 2006 (UTC)

	===Russian nationalism===

	--] 15:15, 26 May 2006 (UTC)


	=== Panslavism ===

	''www.innerasiaresearch.org/Suny%2520Empires.pdf
	The idea of a Pan-Slavic unity, perhaps headed by “the
	tsar of all the Slavs” and not just Russia (an idea expressed by the poet Fedor Tiuchev
	among others), was continually undermined by the resistance of other Slavic peoples,
	most importantly the Poles, who not only did not share Orthodoxy with the Russians but
	whose whole self-identity was bound up in resistance to Russian domination. Closer to
	home both Pan-Slavism and the more modest concept of the Russian people including
	both “Little Russians” (Ukrainians) and “White Russians” (Belorussians) as well as
	“Great Russians” was dealt a severe blow by an emerging separate national identity
	among Ukrainians. After the government suppressed the Ukrainian Brotherhood of Cyril
	and Methodius, a radical Pan-Slavic group, in 1847, it not only reversed its Ukrainophilic
	policy (directed against Polish influenes) but officially condemned Pan-Slavism as a
	dangerous and subversive doctrine''
	--] 22:42, 7 October 2006 (UTC)


	===National Russian identity===


	--] 19:22, 27 May 2006 (UTC)


	=== Slavophiles and Poland ===

	Reassessment of the Relationship: Polish History and the Polish Question in the Imperial Duma
	Journal article by Dmitry Shlapentokh; East European Quarterly, Vol. 33, 1999
	http://www.questia.com/PM.qst?a=o&d=5002313948&er=deny
	''For generations Poles had been a sort of embarrassment for Russian nationalism. Indeed the core of Russian nationalism since the middle of the nineteenth century was an idea of Slavophilism. This ideology (as many others) was inconsistent. On the one hand their representatives emphasized Orthodoxy as the essential characteristic of the Slav, credited for the Slavs' benign characteristics. On the other hand, the very term Slavophilism implied that the benign characteristics of the Slavs stemmed from their ethnicity which had nothing to do with Orthodoxy. This explanation also implied the political unity of the Slavs, or at least their mutual gravitation to each other, and here Poles were an endless embarrassment. The Slavophiles were quite virulent in their attacks on the Poles. According to Iurii F. Samarin, Poland was transformed into a "sharp wedge driven by Latinism" into the very heart of the Slavonic soul with the aim of "splitting it into fragments."(1) Nikolai Ia. Danilevsky, the late Slavophile, dubbed Poland the "Jesuitical gentry state of Poland" and that "Judas of Slavdom," which he compared to a hideous tarantula greedily devouring its eastern neighbor but unaware that its own body is being eaten by its western neighbors.(2) Fedor I. Tiutchev, one of the leading Russian poets, also called Poles "Judas of Slavdom."(3)
	'''
	--] 22:26, 5 October 2006 (UTC)


	=== Orthodox Church architecture as a tool of integration with the Russian Empire(Nevski cathedral certainly will have to be expanded :) ) ===


	--] 13:42, 4 November 2006 (UTC)


	===Restoration of the Russian Empire===


	''In the next several years, however, the Red Army acted not so much as a vehicle of socialist revolution, as an instrument of restoration of the Russian Empire, under a different name. They succeeded brilliantly in Ukraine, the Transcaucasus, and Central Asia, where even the nominally autonomous protectorates of Bukhara and Khiva were taken over. Where the Red Army failed, such as in Poland in 1919, this was not through lack of trying. The Soviet republics, thus formed, immediately entered a political-military alliance with Soviet Russia (formalized in early 1922) and soon thereafter, on December 30, 1922, were fully fused under the name of the USSR.

	Initially, Stalin’s socialism in one country was an introvert exercise. In the 1920s and 1930s, the USSR established diplomatic relations with all neighboring countries, including those formed on the territory of the former Russian Empire, and had no claims on their territory. Only Bessarabia was shaded on the Soviet maps as Romanian-occupied.

	This changed in the late 1930s. Stalin evidently started to view territorial restoration of the Russian Empire as his historic mission, which was almost accomplished by the time he died in 1953-with the sole exceptions of Poland, Finland, and the eastern Turkish districts of Kars and Ardahan.''

	''Of course, the Poles were never really integrated, and were a constant thorn in the side for St.Petersburg. Regular uprisings and revolutions made Russian control of the Vistula provinces tenuous at best. True Slavophiles like Nikolai Danilevsky regarded the annexation of Poland as a mistake, saddling Russia with a powerful and hostile element, never to be truly Russified.40''
	--] 15:13, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

	===The Fall of Panslavism===

	''Rather than emphasizing the cultural union of all Slavs (as the Slavophiles did until the idea fell apart amid the Polish uprisings of the 1860s)''
	--] 16:29, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

	=== Slavophilism ===

	Became a Russian aggresive nationalism

	--] 16:49, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

	=== Stalin and panslavism ===


	--] 16:54, 17 September 2006 (UTC)

	=== Interesting ===


	''Carley also says, "The objectives of Soviet policy were state security and the recovery of the tsars' lost territories." (p. 212)''
	--] 22:02, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

	--] 22:05, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

	===Russian nationalism and Kiev===

	''When Muscovy rose to power, Kiev had long since perished and the tracing of a link
	between the two may to some extent be seen as representative of Great Russian chauvin-
	ism.''
	--] 22:37, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

	==Katkov==

	''Even the conservative nationalist Mikhail Katkov
	(1818-1887) conceived of Russian identity as basically state-centered. Since the state
	was not ethnically homogeneous, that condition had to be changed. Russification would
	provide the state with the ethnic nation below. Though his newspaper, Moskovskie
	Vedomosti, was the most popular on the Right, his nationalist views had only limited
	appeal to the broader population. The idea of a Pan-Slavic unity, perhaps headed by “the
	tsar of all the Slavs” and not just Russia (an idea expressed by the poet Fedor Tiuchev
	among others), was continually undermined by the resistance of other Slavic peoples,
	most importantly the Poles, who not only did not share Orthodoxy with the Russians but
	whose whole self-identity was bound up in resistance to Russian domination.''
	--] 12:18, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


	=== Find more ===


	''Byrnes describes Kliuchevskii as a "nation builder." He wanted to absorb the people already within the state rather than to expand it. A major theme of The Course of Russian History is the gathering of the Russian people into one nation. This idea of the regathering led him to ignore those peoples who can not be readily absorbed. Kliuchevskii saw all Slavs, except for the Poles, as components of that Russian nation.''
	--] 22:11, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

	==Other issuess==

	===Voltair's animosity towards Poland and Catholicism===


	===Interesting===

	--] 17:56, 1 June 2006 (UTC)


	===Polish Panslavism===


	All of them stressed the importance of voluntary union as a principle
	of the Commonwealth’s political system. All of them extolled the
	unique character of the republican virtues of the Commonwealth’s
	citizens and their liberties, as opposed not only to the Russian or the
	Ottoman political traditions, but to Western European bureaucratic
	formalism, and state absolutism in different guises. They re-interpreted
	the “Sarmatian” idea in a more democratic form, that should open up
	citizenship of a regenerated Polish republic to all its inhabitants. At
	the same time, they identified the post-partition political body of
	Poland as a symbol of all oppression. In Mickiewicz’s and Słowacki’s
	messianic-religious interpretation, Poland became the nation-martyr,
	even the Christ of nations. Every struggle for Polish independence,
	every subsequent insurrection – from the Bar confederation, through
	the Kosciuszko uprising, up to the latest (1830-31) war with Russia –
	was interpreted as a model of a brave consistency in striving for
	freedom’s sake. Lelewel was the originator of the battle-cry of the
	uprising of 1830-31, “For your freedom and ours,” which was then
	repeated in the emigration as the new motto of the Polish mission.
	And indeed, Polish emigrants were active and very much visible in
	every possible political turmoil in Europe between 1831 and 1863. The
	revolutions of the so-called Spring of Nations in 1848-49 formed the
	peak of this revolutionary Polish activity.
	The paradoxical nature of the ideology that led the Polish
	emigrants to this hectic activity could be described most concisely as
	an international nationalism, a call to solidarity of nations in their fight
	against the solidarity of despotic monarchs as represented by the
	Sacred Alliance, initiated by Tsar Alexander I, Francis I – Austrian
	emperor, and Frederick William IV – king of Prussia. Polish
	Commonwealth regenerators would be natural leaders in this specific
	nationalist international. The ultimate consequences of their plans are
	vividly described by Mickiewicz in his futuristic vision of the year
	1899 (written in 1832), when he expected a hetman (that is, military
	leader) of the Commonwealth to come back from the Urals after
	defeating the last remnants of the forces of tsarist despotism, thus
	enabling a Free Republic of Siberia to be firmly established. All nations
	were to be liberated – Siberia included – and the center of their
	liberation was to be in the Grand Duchy of Lithuania, regenerated
	and united anew with Poland.
	23
	The whole Eastern and Central
	European post-tsarist realm was to be transformed into a set of
	democratic, nation-based republics, modeled on and liberated with the
	help of the reestablished Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. And so the
	latter was to be a kind of anti-imperial empire. In reality this vision
	inspired revolution-oriented national movements in many parts of
	Europe, and future Zionist leaders as well.
	24
	For Lelewel and Mickiewicz any geopolitical considerations were
	rather alien. They sternly believed in the attractive force of an ethical
	appeal connected to the example of the Polish fight against the tsarist
	imperial arch-enemy – and extended this belief even to the Russian
	nation, which they saw as one of the victims rather than as the most
	important of their enemies. In other version of the Polish emigrants’
	political thought, however, the Polish “liberation doctrine” took a more
	geopolitically oriented shape, distinctly opposing Poland and Russia
	as the two contradictory poles of political attraction in Eastern Europe,
	and in Slavdom in general, not only in terms of some idealistic principle
	but in the harsh reality of state interests. Poland, reconstituted in its
	old, pre-partition borders, would form then a kind of anti-Russian
	strategic magnet. In order to make the future place of Poland secure its
	aim would be not so much to create a Polish Empire, as to disperse the
	existing Russian Empire, diversifying its geopolitical territory into as
	many elements/states as possible. This idea was quite close to the one
	implemented two centuries earlier by Cardinal de Richelieu against the
	German states in order to make France’s strategic position in the east
	unbeatable.
	As an example of this mode of Polish political thought one can
	mention General Ludwik Mierosławski’s geopolitical treatise, published
	in 1857. He explained the necessity of balancing the much too powerful
	and dangerous Russian political realm with a strong Poland and her
	influence in all Slavdom (Russia excluded). Poles (together with
	Ruthenians) should play a central role in the liberation of the Slavonic
	race from despotisms ruling in Eastern Europe, and connect the world of
	the Slavs to western civilization.
	25
	Even more illustrative in this respect
	may be the last stage of Prince Adam Jerzy Czartoryski’s political career
	and thought. In 1831 the former foreign minister of the Russian Empire
	became the prime minister of the Polish insurgents’ government, and
	ended as the head of the most implacable enemy of the Russian Empire’s
	territorialintegrity, forthirtyyears leadinghispropaganda and diplomatic
	fight against the tsarist state from his émigré base in Paris. Disappointed
	in the idea of a just empire, which he had cherished during his service in
	the courtof Alexander I, hedeveloped a highly originalconcept of nations
	and the priority of their right to independence over imperial states in
	organizing a new political order in Europe. He expressed this new idea
	first in his extensive Essay on Diplomacy (written in 1823 and printed in
	1830), and then tried to realize it against the Russian Empire. Leading the
	post-insurrection diplomacy and propaganda of the Polish emigration
	for thirty years, prince Czartoryski became the main patron of using all
	ethnically non-Russian elements of the Empire in order to tear it apart.
	His battle against the Tsar Nicholas I’s state was independence for Don
	Cossacks, Tatars, Circassians (Chechens), Finns, Estonians and other
	ethnic or religious minorities he portrayed as victims of the Russian
	Empire’s oppression. Inspired by the prince’s agents, and backed by
	Western European powers, especially by the British, these new nations
	were to form an important element of Czartoryski’s plan for the Russian
	Empire’s destruction and formation of a new political order in all of
	Eastern Europe. It is worth stressing that Czartoryski was consistent in
	extending his principles and efforts to lands of the Ottoman and – to a
	lesser extent – Habsburg empires, backing national movements of the
	Rumanians, Serbs, Croatians, Hungarians, and Bulgarians
	--] 22:32, 12 September 2006 (UTC)


	--] 16:52, 17 September 2006 (UTC)


	=== Putin tries to form alliance against Poland with Germany ===

	http://www.kommersant.com/p711628/G...reign_partners/
	The energy alliance requires joint action, and Putin has things to ask of Merkel. Moscow is very annoyed by Polish support of a pan-European cooperation agreement on energy policy. The new Polish government is concerned with the sharp fall in income from transit that will take place if gas supplies to Europe through Poland are reduced. Therefore, Warsaw has politicized the issue, lobbying (with the backing of the U.S.) for an “energy NATO” for Eastern Europe. One of the main Russian proposals that will be made at the meeting is joint opposition to Poland's idea.
	--] 12:00, 10 October 2006 (UTC)



	=== The most succesfull transit economy in Central Europe ===


	--] 20:46, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

	=== Scandal in New York as city official insults Polish minority ===



	Cached article here:


	NY Daily News article:

	''Greenpoint's main problem, he wrote, was "Polish people infesting its rowhouses."
	Langlieb described a Greenpoint "of the future" that will be filled with lawyers and investment bankers "after the vermin are gone."
	''
	--] 13:15, 4 November 2006 (UTC)



	==Other Users Comments==

	===Blocked for yet more disruptive edit warring and incivility===
	Molobo, you were blocked for a month from editing for that highly disruptive revert rampage that very nearly got you blocked indefinitely for one of the lengthiest histories of edit warring of anyone around. You know the deal: the only reason you aren't blocked indefinitely already is because at the request of Piotrus, Chris 73, and others, we all agreed to this: "I'll put it back at a month with the stipulation that at the first whiff of a return to edit warring he will be reblocked." Recently you've engaged in extensive edit warring on many distinct articles, including, but definitely not limited to,
	,
	,
	,
	,
	,
	,
	and those are just the ones I found in the last few days before I tired of looking at your contributions. I am disheartened to see you continuing this behavior, rather than using proper, constructive, ]. For continuing this disruptive behavior, I have blocked you for a year, as promised. You are a career edit warrior, and uncivil to boot , and you've worn out your welcome here and used up all your second chances for a long time to come. ]·] 05:33, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

	I disagree with this block. I engaged in civil and proper discussion of issues, and experienced revert waring upon sourced information from users engaging in far less creative activity that I have. Their actions seem to be based more on political and national preferences rather then aim of objectivity. Since the block information on treatment of Poles in Prussia, by Bismarck was deleted, although historians consider it a major part of Prussian policy.
	--] 23:29, 6 September 2006 (UTC)

	===Question by Ghirlandajo===
	:Molobo, are you not tired of your campaign? Do you really think that pan-Slavism (unity with other Slavic peoples) presents such a great danger for Poland? --<font color="FC4339">]</font> <sup><font color="C98726">]</font></sup> 12:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

	::Slavic people are long gone and extinct replaced by various different nations with completely different cultures and histories, Pan-slavic ideology is a tool of Russian imperialism that sought to justify its territorial expansion and influence in Europe and at the same time destroy other nationalities by Russifying them(claiming that Russians are "true Slavs"). The fact that Russian of today officials re-call panslavistic thought that was used by Tsars as justification for massacres of Poles is worrying and shows that this hateful ideology is still alive in some circles of Russian politicians either as sign of ignorance or nationalism.
	--] 12:46, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
	::: Hmmm, and how about ]? That's the tool of whom or what? -- ] <sup>]</sup> 12:48, 24 October 2006 (UTC)


	''Ad hominem tu quoque refers to an irrelevant accusation of hypocrisy. Accusations of hypocrisy are inadmissible in legal and scientific debate, and can be distractions from the business of politics. That is, it is not relevant to the credibility of a didactic argument whether its presenter has trod over the principle he espouses. For example, a corrupt lawyer who prosecutes embezzlers may be a sleaze, but in a properly organized legal system there can be no arguments against his defendant just because of that.''

	A typical ] responce...
	'' That's the tool of whom or what? ''
	Nobody since nobody in Poland pushes forward such slogans and it never was a ideology comperable to Panslavism. As to the article it is terribly biased and written by Irpen who used a Panslavist(!) quotes to write about Poland. That is as neutral as giving writings of Nazi ideologist to write about Jews, since the Panslavist on regular basis wrote about Poland such things as "tarantula", "Judas" etc. They can't be seen as objective source of information regarding Poland, as hatred for Poland was one their most popular ideas. Thus the Misplaced Pages rule of :

	''The websites and publications of political parties and religious groups should be treated with caution, although neither political affiliation nor religious belief is in itself a reason not to use a source. Widely acknowledged '''extremist''' or even terrorist '''organizations or individuals''', whether of a''' political, religious, racist, or other character''',''' should never be used as sources for Misplaced Pages''', except as primary sources, that is to say '''they should only be used in articles about those organizations or individuals.''' Even then they should be used with great caution, and should be supported by other sources.''

	Panslavists were both political and religious extremists that bordered on racism.
	--] 12:55, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

	===New interesting article===

	Check this out: ], and please, make it better :) ] 13:15, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

	== German officials commemorate residence of Goering. ==


	{\| class="wikitable"
	--] 15:30, 13 November 2006 (UTC)

	== Hundreds of German criminals sent to Poland by German officials. ==



	German firms arrange the agreement which often is fiction as the people in Poland don't know even how to speak German. Not long ago, a 15 year old German criminal raped 82year old Polish women.
	--] 17:40, 15 November 2006 (UTC)

	== Photos of children and women murdered by Soviet Partisans relased ==




	This will be important addition for ] article.
	--] 16:06, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

	== Edits to your user page ==

	An anonymous IP editor has been making changes to your User page. I have rolled back those changes, as there was no indication that they were being made by you.

	If you would like to change your user page – as an editor under a long term editing ban – you have two options. I will delete your user page if you make a logged-in request here, or you may edit your user page (logged-in) when your block expires.

	Misplaced Pages isn't here to provide a soapbox for editors who have been blocked for a failure to edit politely and constructively with others. ](]) 16:48, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

	It's not here to provide a soapbox for people like Molobo who endlessly distort information to favor their own nationalistic, racist views either, and delete anyone's contributions which they don't like or don't corroborate their skewed version of history. Anyone who actually reads his posts can see for themselves that he endlessly, obsessively spreads anti-German hatred on this website.]

	That IP isn't mine. I have been fairly often attacked by anon IPs possing as myself in order to possibly block me forever, while I am patient enough to wait for the ban made due to harrasment of certain users which I reacted in wrong way to be over. If you want to block the main user page (as I think you ask) please do. I don't want it to be deleted, but protection is ok with me.
	--] 17:25, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

	== Wikibreak or Block? ==

	Question: it says you are taking a wikibreak, is this true or are you blocked from editing currently? (] 16:18, 19 March 2007 (UTC)
	:Molobo was many times. On 24 June 2006, Molobo was blocked with an expiry time of 1 year as he ''Used up all your last chances: the edit warring and incivility continues, and shows no sign of ever stopping.'' -- ] ]  ]    12:35, 7 April 2007 (UTC)

	thats ridiculous. you should get three warnings and bye.--] 05:57, 12 May 2007 (UTC)

	== Welcome back, has it been a year already? ==

	I just saw your recent edit and thought "What, Molobo's back? Has it been a year already?" and yes, it has and yes, you are. Welcome back. I hope you will avoid tendentious editing and edit warring.

	Please take a look at ] and ] and let me know what you think about how they have evolved over the last year. Also look at ] and ].

	I'm interested in what you think about all of these articles.

	--] 21:42, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

	:Welcome back, per Richard. Here's some good advice:
	::Consider yourself on an informal 1RR limitation. Or, in other words: avoid more then one revert on article per day.
	::If you post a Poland-German related issue to Polish noticeboard, post it at the German noticeboard too. Those boards are not meant for canvassing support from only one group of editors; consensus can only be reached if all sides are aware of an issue.
	::I don't think you were ever incivil, but just in case - respect ].
	::I am sure some editors who cannot forgive and forget will start calling you names. Ignore them or file for mediation if it is too difficult. Sure, it's unfair, but that's life.
	:Take care, --<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]\|]</span></sub> 22:00, 17 July 2007 (UTC)
	:::An there I was, wondering if you missed the expiration of your one year block. Boy, does time fly. -- ] \| ] 07:27, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

	== My restoration of the {{fact}} tag on ] ==

	Hi Molobo,

	I restored the <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tag that you removed because, although it may be "common knowledge" to those who are familiar with that era of German history, it is not necessarily common knowledge to the average reader who is not as familiar with it. I dislike using <nowiki>{{fact}}</nowiki> tags because they imply that the assertion is being challenged as factually untrue. Many times, I add <nowiki>{{citation needed}}</nowiki> tags to indicate that it would be useful to have a citation to provide the reader with more information about the topic.

	Just wanted to explain my revert so you would understand that it was not done in a confrontational way.

	--] 23:51, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

	:I agree with Richard. It's always better to provide reference then remove citation tags.--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]\|]</span></sub> 13:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)
	I provided two references.
	--] 13:23, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

	==Re:]==
	I think one article would be enough, although I admit I don't follow exactly what it would be on: ]? You can always write a draft in your userspace and we can decide the subject later; although an even better idea is to ask for suggestions at ].--<sub><span style="border:1px solid #228B22;padding:1px;">]\|]</span></sub> 13:20, 18 July 2007 (UTC)

	== the real life ==

	I cite you: "so many battles, so many tsars and thinkers, manifests, very glorious-but where is the real life in Russia ? Burlaks on the Volga gives diversity by showing the life of the masses".
	I congratulate, it's absolutely marxist statement. However during millenia the real life of masses was absolute a nightmare also in Europe - in the countries having much more favorable climatic, natural, communicational conditions than Russia. In 1840-s in the most advanced country of the world Great Britain 1 million Irish died of famine and many millions people starved to death in the British Indian colonies. (It is possible to recollect an awful life of serfs and bloody revolts and mass executions in 17-18th centuries in Poland. Does it cancel the proud pictures by Jan Matejko?). In some regions of Asia and Africa almost till our time tribes lived in conditions of the Stone Age and were engaged in cannibalism. The real life has many layers (serfs, nobles, thinkers etc). The life of masses is determined by a level of economic development of the country which depends not only on ideology, also on thousand natural factors (The ideology is more likely consequence of the natural conditions) ] 12:00, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

	Let me add a favorite quote of mine which might be pertinent:

	''We must welcome the future, remembering that soon it will be the past; and we must respect the past, remembering that it was once all that was humanly possible.''

	], quoted by ] 03:31, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

	== Babel ==

	Talk:Polish-Soviet War

	68.Babel

	] 08:58, 3 September 2007 (UTC)

	==Formatting your entries for the umpteenth time==
	Molobo, I told you that at least two dozen times. And so did other people. You repeatedly screw up the talk pages by misformating the whole thing by your sloppy entries. That is of course disregarding flooding it for which you were blocked.

	But anyway, I just formatted the page after your intrusion ''again'' taking an effort to preserve your edits whatever I think of them. This was officially the last time I did that. Your next entry that screws the whole page will be reverted and you will have to add it properly yourself. This repeated discourtesy has got to stop at some point. --] 02:50, 5 September 2007 (UTC)
	:Thank you for the improved formatting of your talk page entries. I hope now, that you showed that you can properly format them when you take a small effort, you will continue doing so as to not make your colleagues think that you edit the talk page sloppily because you treat others with disrespect. One small additional request. Please use edit summaries AND, when you start a new section, please title it meaningfully. TIA, --] 01:02, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
	:::I see that you persist with not using edit summaries despite several request. Why so stubbornly persisting with this discourtesy? such contempt towards your colleagues with who you have to work does not help you advance your arguments. Please discontinue this practice. --] 02:55, 7 September 2007 (UTC)
	::::On talk pages edit summaries are not essential. I certainly don't mind if they are absent. I think Irpen's criticism is invalid here. Edit summaries must be used to justify changing the content of an article, and so there they are indeed crucial. On the other hand, it seems obvious that changes to talk pages do not have to be justified. ] 16:07, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

	== thank you ==

	Hello sir, I just stumbled by here and I have to say that the information you compiled about Germany is very, very interesting. Thank you for doing this. ] 20:10, 5 September 2007 (UTC)

	==]==

	Re your material and reference: visit the Mitteleuropa page, click on "what links here", insert where your judgment tells you it would be germane to the article. ] 14:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

	== Baiting and pov-pushing ==
	] is not about a Polish name but a Czech, German and English one and thus it doesn't fit into your agenda, which apart from that is no different than ever. Because my vote was the previous one and you provided absolutely no reason for your choice, which contradicted mine, it is hard not to think you're just baiting me. And when I in response clicked to see your contributions, it is just as hard not to notice your POV-pushing at ], an article we both had some fight over a year and something ago. Among others, you've the claims that:
	*"Poles were denied the right to build a home", not specifying in which limited areas that was so, what the background was and from when to when the law was active.
	*they were forbidden to "speak Polish in public", referring to the 1908 law that just forbade the use of Polish for assemblies in areas where less than 60% of the population was Polish, something you apparently yourself.
	*"laws were made allowing for explusion of Poles from their homes", possibly referring to the clause that allowed the expropriation of Polish property if not enough area of settlement was available, a clause that was exerted only once and which met with resistance of even Conservatives.
	These are not just any claims but those we also had some talk over, culminating in this , which treats the first two points and to which you would never be able to reply. For my description of the second point ("the 1908 law that just forbid" etc) and the third, I did not have to look any further than my old history book for school (ISBN 3464642038, p.196) to disprove it. So citing these glaring untruths and bias when you know better and making me well aware of it, are you trying to provoke me? I'm not going to revert war with you again and I don't think I should have to.

	I hope you do know that a then arbitrator once thought your block ought to be indefinite and that because you continued to stride on the same path even after that, you were actually lucky to have been blocked only for a year. And seeing you go on like that despite your previous record and despite long-lasting in the Polish wikipedia and despite tremendous sockpuppetry here during your block's last three months, I must say you're being a daredevil. ] 16:05, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

	:Sorry for butting in, but following recent events at AN/I, I ended up here; and couldn't help but to notice the background and the statements of both of you. The charges of sockpuppetry are very serious, dear Sciurinae, for they would mean a fresh reset of the block. Can you produce evidence of them? Regards, ] - 22:33, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

	::In this case, I'll post it. Below is an unusual chain of 48 short-lived accounts and IP addresses from April to June 2007 with about 200 edits altogether. These users are all very similar to each other and they are all much like Molobo, but look for yourself (sorted by time).

	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]
	#]

	::The POV and language is eerily uniform and in general so is the behaviour, the articles, the sources and the edits. I have not added evidence regarding these points so that Molobo doesn't know exactly how to improve next time. What speaks against such accusation is Molobo's to wait patiently out his block and he did not evade previous blocks as far as I'm aware. As Molobo also did not edit shortly before or shortly after these incidents, I lost hope that a sockpuppet check could be successful and I did not want to accuse him before being able to prove it beyond reasonable doubt. Aside from this, Ghirlandajo had already accused him of sockpuppetry, but he hadn't given any evidence yet. I don't know whether he has a similar number of puppets for Russian-related articles.

	::The person behind the accounts and IPs is also a native speaker of Polish. His account named MarekZob lectured someone who categorizes himself as a native speaker of Polish . No wonder, the IPs are located in Poland. They point at Wroclaw, relatively near the place where Molobo's well-known IP ( ) points (Legnica). Granted, that's a different IP. But Molobo stopped using in March 2007. This could be because his edits were constantly reverted there and/or because of the change of provider/city. Only now has there been unassailable IP evidence, by Molobo himself. ] 23:39, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 02:11, 30 September 2007