Revision as of 18:45, 30 September 2007 editEvb-wiki (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers27,680 editsmNo edit summary← Previous edit | Revision as of 21:17, 30 September 2007 edit undoBeh-nam (talk | contribs)8,290 edits →3RR: new sectionNext edit → | ||
Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd --> ] 18:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. <!-- Inserted via Template:Nothanks-sd --> ] 18:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC) | ||
== 3RR == | |||
{{3RR}} -- ] 21:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:17, 30 September 2007
Welcome!
Hello, Hon203, and welcome to Misplaced Pages! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Misplaced Pages
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Misplaced Pages:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}}
before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 08:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
September 2007
Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Misplaced Pages articles. Doing so violates Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -- Shadowlynk (Talk) 08:47, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Misplaced Pages. An article you recently created, Sitam E Milli, may not conform to some of Misplaced Pages's guidelines for new articles, so it will shortly be removed (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do and please read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Articles such as this violate Misplaced Pages's neutral point of view policy. Angus McLellan (Talk) 09:30, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Sitam E Milli (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Misplaced Pages articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. For future editing tests use the sandbox. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 17:50, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Sitam E Milli. Misplaced Pages has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Misplaced Pages and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Misplaced Pages:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Misplaced Pages. Thank you. Evb-wiki 18:14, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
Copyright problems
Hello. Concerning your contribution, Sitam E Milli, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material without the permission of the author. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://content.cdlib.org/xtf/view?docId=ft7b69p12h&doc.view=content&chunk.id=ch03&toc.depth=1&anchor.id=0&brand=ucpress. As a copyright violation, Sitam E Milli appears to qualify for deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Sitam E Milli has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. For text material, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source, provided that it is credible.
If you believe that the article or image is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author, leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Sitam E Milli and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Misplaced Pages:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Sitam E Milli with a link to where we can find that note.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on Talk:Sitam E Milli.
However, for text content, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Misplaced Pages. Evb-wiki 18:44, 30 September 2007 (UTC)
3RR
Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. -- Behnam 21:17, 30 September 2007 (UTC)