Misplaced Pages

:Articles for deletion/World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting: Difference between revisions - Misplaced Pages

Article snapshot taken from Wikipedia with creative commons attribution-sharealike license. Give it a read and then ask your questions in the chat. We can research this topic together.
< Misplaced Pages:Articles for deletion Browse history interactively← Previous editNext edit →Content deleted Content addedVisualWikitext
Revision as of 04:20, 4 October 2007 editGavin.collins (talk | contribs)18,503 edits Add to Misplaced Pages:WikiProject Deletion sorting/Science fiction← Previous edit Revision as of 04:25, 4 October 2007 edit undoRray (talk | contribs)Extended confirmed users9,856 edits '''Speedy keep and snowball''' - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notabilityNext edit →
Line 5: Line 5:
This book of gaming instructions has no independent source demonstrating [WP:NOTABILITY This book of gaming instructions has no independent source demonstrating [WP:NOTABILITY
*<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>--] 04:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)</small> *<small>'''Note''': This debate has been included in the ]. </small> <small>--] 04:18, 4 October 2007 (UTC)</small>

'''Speedy keep and snowball''' - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability. It's hard to assume that this is anything but a bad faith AfD nomination considering the nominator's editing history and the recent discussion on the talk page of this article and on the nominator's personal talk page. ] 04:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:25, 4 October 2007

World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting

World of Greyhawk Fantasy Game Setting (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

This book of gaming instructions has no independent source demonstrating [WP:NOTABILITY

Speedy keep and snowball - The AfD was discussed on the talk page and the consensus was that the article should not be nominated for deletion. The article lists 2 references asserting notability. It's hard to assume that this is anything but a bad faith AfD nomination considering the nominator's editing history and the recent discussion on the talk page of this article and on the nominator's personal talk page. Rray 04:25, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Categories: