Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 17:15, 8 October 2007

User:ExtraDry/Newington Sockpuppets

Per Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Archifile, which was decidedly inconclusive, and the hosting user's extreme hostility towards those on this list, I believe this should be deleted per CSD G10. I have listed it here so the community can consider it. Orderinchaos 23:43, 7 October 2007 (UTC)}

• Keep per Misplaced Pages:Requests_for_checkuser/Case/Silveriver which was decidedly Confirmed and others have been confirmed through other methods. It's not an attack page just a listing for reference. I would consider this MFD an attack. ExtraDry 23:48, 7 October 2007 (UTC)
  • As several have been specifically confirmed to not be related, and you have harassed them persistently for well over four months now, I think it is time you left it to the community to manage this situation. If you really feel that this situation must be resolved otherwise I encourage you to look at mediation as an option. Orderinchaos 23:59, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

You just have to look at my talk paage to see the abuse i recieved from them. Here are some examples , , , . Also between 09:56, 11 June 2007 & 11:09, 11 June 200 Castlemate made 13 edits to my talk page just to post harrasing comments. Tallum first edits were to the Industrial dispute section which the other sockpupets were editing heavely. , Waterdanks did the same thing also . ExtraDry 00:33, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete. It looks like a general hit-list with absolutely no evidence of sockpuppetry presented whatsoever. If you need a record of this information, please store it off-Wiki on your computer, but having a page on-site where you allege that other editors who have been proven to be unrelated are actually "sockpuppets" is a very inappropriate use of userspace. Sarah 01:24, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The evidence is in the contributions. I have added it to the main page thou. ExtraDry 01:38, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

The evidence is in the checkuser, which came back negative. Twenty Years 01:46, 8 October 2007 (UTC)]

Misplaced Pages:Requests for checkuser/Case/Silveriver Confirmed ExtraDry 01:50, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Of the 17 accounts/IP's that have been mentioned on your page, only 8 have been found to be sockpuppets. Accusing people who have not been proven to be sockpuppets is a serious violation of policy. Twenty Years 03:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Also linking Silveriver and Archifile isn't entirely sound, so it seems to be two separate, possibly unrelated groups. Orderinchaos 11:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I think you may also wish to read WP:KETTLE in regards to your comments that others are Single Purpose Accounts (SPA). Twenty Years 03:14, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm not a SPA my edits are very varried, Its a pity that "Other Users" cough are forcing me to spend my time fighting sockpuppets and vandals. ExtraDry 03:39, 8 October 2007 (UTC) Exercise Robin Sage, Defence Force Discipline Act, Jessica Michalik just to name a couple. All have no connection to Newington College while the other accounts all of there edits have some connection. ExtraDry 03:41, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Some connection being a teacher maybe? DXRAW was from what ive been told, which was a previous incarnation of yourself. Stop making up silly pages like this, where people like OIC have to come along and waste their time deleting. Twenty Years 06:58, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Hang on TY, this person is DXRAW? Has that been confirmed? DXRAW was very disruptive and has quite a few disruption-type blocks on their log which should be linked to from their new block log if they've rescinded their right to vanish and simply created a new sockpuppet, rather than leaving as they claimed they were doing. Sarah 07:13, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

It is reasonably certain from contribs that DXRAW and ExtraDry were the same person - checkuser declined it at the time per WP:DUCK. We didn't treat it too seriously as one had clearly left when the other started. There is also some instances of blatant disruption unrelated to DXRAW on *this* account, such as offering assistance to a troll (who got permbanned days later) who was menacing good faith users. Anyway, this is not a conduct review, it's an MfD, so we're a bit off topic. Orderinchaos 11:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

If they are the same, and I agree it looks extremely likely, the block logs should be linked because this guy now has a clean block log and will start with short escalating blocks, when they actually have a block history and should be starting with longer blocks. It looks like the accounts weren't used at the same time but this new account was created months before DXRAW left and was essentially a sleeper account. Sarah 13:28, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Can you please provide me a link to the checkuser request. ExtraDry 12:29, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

I'm sick & tired of this. I'm not that guy. Why would I leave then come back. With false complaints going around I'm not surprised that he/she left. BTW Isnt it only sockpuppety if they are using Multiple accounts at the same time? Oh & TY who said that i was DXRAW, Thats right A WP:SPA that is a possible sockpuppet. ExtraDry 08:11, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

Sorry, contribs prove to me and to anyone who's looked beyond any doubt that the two of you are the same person. Free Hugs Campaign, Ryde, wrestling, certain military topics, with an obsessive interest in Newington College and on alleged SPAs on it, a significantly lesser attention to The Scots College, with almost all other schools ignored by both, a consistent performance on AfD, a tendency to revert using a particular form of summary, and with edits on one account stopping on 27 May and edits on this one starting on 28 May. Even some of your unrelated-to-Newington enemies are the same people as those of the former account. Meanwhile, 430 of your 842 edits (including deleted ones) on this account relate to Newington and associated, with claims of and campaigns against alleged socks extending back to your second week on this account. (Interestingly, so have allegations that you are DXRAW). Orderinchaos 17:10, 8 October 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Although some of the information may be true about being being blocked. Calling someone a sockpuppet who is not proven to be a sockpuppet is quite a serious policy violation. Id agree with Sarah's comments, if you really want to keep it, then store it on your computer. Twenty Years 01:35, 8 October 2007 (UTC)