Misplaced Pages

Revision as of 18:00, 10 October 2007

In order to remain listed at Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/User conduct, at least two people need to show that they tried to resolve a dispute with this user and have failed. This must involve the same dispute with a single user, not different disputes or multiple users. The persons complaining must provide evidence of their efforts, and each of them must certify it by signing this page with ~~~~. If this does not happen within 48 hours of the creation of this dispute page (which was: 17:10, 10 October 2007 (UTC)), the page will be deleted. The current date and time is: 21:27, 11 January 2025 (UTC).

• Whig (talk · contribs · logs)

Users should only edit one summary or view, other than to endorse.

Statement of the dispute

User Whig has been involved in disputes at the Homeopathy article for the past week or so and despite numerous attempts by myself and others, this user has failed to make any attempts to resolve the disputes in a constructive manner. This user has repeatedly been threatening and rude to several editors and engages in edit wars and canvassing in an attempt to further his/her motives.

Desired outcome

The desired outcome of this RFC is that the user drastically alter his/her editing style and procedures as well as attitude toward wikipedia. The desired outcome is that this user also apologize for his/her threatening remarks, incivility, and edit wars. This user has also had a previous RFC a few months ago with essentially the same things brought up but for other topics and by other users: Misplaced Pages:Requests for comment/Whig

Description

This user has:

• Made threatening remarks towards me and other users.
• Engaged in edit wars to further disputes.
• Refused to acknowledge any attempts to resolve disputes despite exhaustive attempts.
• Replied with threats and filibustering when attempts to resolve disputes were made.
• User has a history of above mentioned behavior.

Evidence of disputed behavior

Diffs are in ascending order of their occurrence, earliest first.

1. refers to Adam Cuerden as "POV warrior in revert summary
2. user calls my statement that article is NPOV "defensive"
3. user refers to other user as "bias" and insults him
4. states that adam cuerden "ruthlessly ignores facts"
5. Whig engages in edit war over Adam's removal of his insults. 1, 2, 3.
6. user resorts to sarcasm
7. User accuses Adam of being "rude" and "owning" the homeopathy article
8. User engages in edit war over POV tag on homeopathy article: 1, 2, 3, 4.
9. user refers to me and other editors as "pov warriors
10. user uses "RFC" as a threat against me and claims that I harassed him via E-mail
11. user threatens to make public E-mail correspondence between him and I. In the E-mails I was totally civil and attempted to resolve disputes. I have said repeatedly that I have no objection to him publicizing the E-mails as I have nothing to hide. After a few E-mails he basically demanded that I stop E-mailing him and then accused me of "harassment". I have not sent him an E-mail since. I would be more than happy to forward all of the E-mails to a neutral party as proof of no wrongdoing on my part BTW.
12. User calls me "contentious" for stating that reverting over and over is defined as an "edit war"
13. user accuses me of "owning" article, says I don't AGF, and then complains that I am bias
14. User starts ANOTHER edit war which resulted in him being blocked for 12 hours: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5. block log
15. user attempts to recruit other editors to engage in edit war
16. user request unblock stating that "I have done nothing to disrupt"

Applicable policies and guidelines

1. WP:3RR
2. WP:CANVASS
3. WP:GAME
4. WP:AGF
5. WP:CIVIL

Evidence of trying and failing to resolve the dispute

1. user dismisses note from other user on edit warring
2. user dismisses admin attempt to resolve edit war
3. user dismisses my attempt to resolve dispute
4. User refuses to summarize his disputes with article so that it can be improved:1, 2,
5. user refuses another request to summarize disputes and then threatens me
6. user refuses (again) to summarize disputes and then insults me

Users certifying the basis for this dispute

{Users who tried and failed to resolve the dispute}

1. Adam Cuerden 18:00, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Other users who endorse this summary

Response

This is a summary written by the user whose conduct is disputed, or by other users who think that the dispute is unjustified and that the above summary is biased or incomplete. Users signing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Outside Views") should not edit the "Response" section.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Outside view

This is a summary written by users not directly involved with the dispute but who would like to add an outside view of the dispute. Users editing other sections ("Statement of the dispute" and "Response") should not edit the "Outside Views" section, except to endorse an outside view.

{Add summary here, but you must use the endorsement section below to sign. Users who edit or endorse this summary should not edit the other summaries.}

Users who endorse this summary:

Discussion

All signed comments and talk not related to an endorsement should be directed to this page's discussion page. Discussion should not be added below. Discussion should be posted on the talk page. Threaded replies to another user's vote, endorsement, evidence, response, or comment should be posted to the talk page.